Jump to content

Luis Barrera vs McKenna vs Stewart at 4th OFer


wildcard

Recommended Posts

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/04/athletics-claim-gabe-klobosits-waivers-nationals-dfa-luis-barrera.html

The A's DFA'd outfielder Luis Barrera (26).  He hits and throws lefty.  Pipeline  rates him:  50 Hit,  35 power, 70 run, 55 arm,  55 field

Ryan McKenna (25) Hits and throws righty. Pipeline rated him in 2020:                            45-50 Hit, 40-45 power, 60-65 run,   50 arm, 55-60 field

Barrera better  run and arm.  Not as much power.

Stewart has more power but is not as good a fielder.  

All three have options.

Would you claim Barrera and put him or McKenna at AAA and DFA Stewart?

(Of course the A's trade Barrera.  I doubt the O's would trade for him.  But if he does not get claimed?)

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/barrelu01.shtml

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good topic.  Fangraphs had Barrera 31st in Oakland’s system and graded him 70 run and arm, 45 field, 40/45 hit, 50 raw power but 30 game power.   

As between Barrera and McKenna, I think it boils down to who the O’s think has the better hit tool.   Tie goes to the incumbent.   

As to DFAing Stewart to make room, I’m pretty indifferent.   Different skill sets entirely.  But I don’t see having both Barrera and McKenna on a major league roster together, whereas I do see having Stewart and one of the other two.  I know I’m probably one of the few people here who has any patience remaining with Stewart.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Triple A already has a full OF (even down at triple-A I don't see many starts in the OF for Stewart) of guys you want to play. You're basically asking if he is a better defensive replacement/PR then McKenna, and I mean maybe but it would only be marginal if that (mostly due to the lefty bat)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hazmat said:

Would you trade Stewart for Barrera?

Yes,   I don't think Stewart makes it on the 40 man roster for another couple of months.   I don't know whether Barrera is better than McKenna but the O's don't have to make that  decision for a while.   One can be the majors and the other in the minors.

And as I said he probably gets traded to someone other than the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Barrera is lefty on a most righty team,  McKenna is righty.

Vavra is playing CF of the Tides.   Barrera is faster probably with better range and arm.

I have zero interest in playing Barrera over vavra in triple a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, seak05 said:

I have zero interest in playing Barrera over vavra in triple a

Barrera has 70 speed.   Vavra has 50 speed.

Its about collecting talent.

And when Hays is injured for a month.  What then?  I don't think Diaz, Vavra or Stowers have the speed to play LF at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Barrera has 70 speed.   Vavra has 50 speed.

Its about collecting talent.

And when Hays is injured for a month.  What then?  I don't think Diaz, Vavra or Stowers have the speed to play LF at home.

Vavra Is a far better hitter.   Barrera probably is the better outfielder, but I want Vavra to continue developing.  

I think you are overestimating the extent to which the change in the LF dimensions is going to change the calculus between offense vs. defense trade offs in LF.   Guys like Vavra and Stowers are certainly fast enough to cover the extra ground.   Diaz may be a little challenged.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

Vavra Is a far better hitter.   Barrera probably is the better outfielder, but I want Vavra to continue developing.  

I think you are overestimating the extent to which the change in the LF dimensions is going to change the calculus between offense vs. defense trade offs in LF.   Guys like Vavra and Stowers are certainly fast enough to cover the extra ground.   Diaz may be a little challenged.   
 

Vavra, Stowers  and Diaz are all rated as 50  speed.   The left fielder in Camden has to cover almost as much ground as the center fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Vavra, Stowers  and Diaz are all rated as 50  speed.   The left fielder in Camden has to cover almost as much ground as the center fielder.

All you keep doing is mentioning speed grades.  I thought we were talking about building a baseball team, not a track team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

Vavra, Stowers  and Diaz are all rated as 50  speed.   The left fielder in Camden has to cover almost as much ground as the center fielder.

I think you are significantly over-concerned with left field and the need for speed there. Don't think it will play out quite as you think. Sure it's nice to have speed in that position at home, but a true outfielder like Diaz, despite his lack of speed, will be fine out there for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think you are significantly over-concerned with left field and the need for speed there. Don't think it will play out quite as you think. Sure it's nice to have speed in that position at home, but a true outfielder like Diaz, despite his lack of speed, will be fine out there for the most part.

It's not like they are not positioning OF'ers from the dugout. I can't wait to see the new LF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Vavra, Stowers  and Diaz are all rated as 50  speed.   The left fielder in Camden has to cover almost as much ground as the center fielder.

Last year O’s center fielders made 438 putouts.   The left fielders made 299.   Even adding in say 25 extra balls in play, a LF does not need to cover the same ground a CF does, and there just aren’t as many opportunities.

By the way, last year Fangraphs gave Diaz a 40 speed grade.  That’s why I said he may be a little challenged.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Right now I see the pitching staff as.  Eflin, GRod, Suarez, Kremer and one of Povich, Rogers, McDermott and Young.  All of the 5th starters have options so they can be on the shuttle if needed.   Bradish and Wells may come back in the 2nd half. Pen:  Bautista, Cano, Coulombe, Dominguez, Soto, Akin, Perez, Webb and Bowman.   Yes that is 9 but someone is normally injured.   I will not be surprised if the O's protect Nick Anderson and bring him to camp in case of injuries.    Akin has an option next year. That is 20 pitchers. Will Elias look to improve over the winner? Sure but with the 5th starters being able to either start or be a long man in the pen the O's begin the off season with volume on the pitching staff.
    • If you're going to make this a WAR/OPS/OPS+ debate, sure, he's not the best offensive player right now.  But then again his power/speed combination makes him tough to beat. Best talent ever because of the ability to pitch, yes.  That's the point I was making.  Not only to pitch, but to be dominant on the hill, too.
    • I think Mullins is as set as the entire lineup, but he would have to go if Elias chased the Robert upgrade. Getz already navigated the 3-team thing when he wanted Dodgers Latin kids, and the Dodgers didn't feel Erick Fedde was the caliber of pitcher they wanted to deploy. I do like Santander as a Victor Martinez aficionado, but he and Kjerstad are both RF profiles and, holy Rio Ruiz Batman, the handpicked kid has to play.    This is one of those calculations where the 80% as good for 20% of the cost part is easy, even if Kjerstad never achieves the heights Santander is at now. There's still room to hope Kjerstad is all Santander is and more, but even if he isn't, the team needs the Santander salary slot repurposed to pitching more than it needs him. I think after this summer's moves, we got a fair bit of information if Elias is trading Cowser/Kjerstad for pitching...looking like he isn't.
    • I think you can argue he’s the best talent ever because of his ability to pitch. As an offensive player, he’s not the best player right now.
    • Age, body type, how he plays(strengths/weaknesses) and what we have depth at, in terms of high end talent, coming up behind him. And yes, we should be out on most key FAs because they are largely terrible investments.
    • I'd say that overall his defense has also been down this year.  
    • Your point is entirely valid. Just because Tony is better than Trumbo was means nothing, because Trumbo was a catastrophe. It was just beyond comprehension that they kept putting him in the field. That said, Santander is still ok. Diminished range, but a good glove and arm. However, they avoided the problem with Nelson Cruz in Seattle and Minnesota by just putting him designated hitter, so that’s a possibility for Santander, if he can maintain solid contact. But not here. Let’s take the pick and use it on pitching, please.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...