Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2022


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Use your head.  It's the same ball against the same kind of bats, usually made out of maple, maybe hickory.  If ballplayers are swinging at the same speed, it's going to make the same sound.

The variables here are the ballparks, specifically how many people are in the ballpark.  Human beings packed close together absorb sound.  That's why Gunnar's homer sounded so loud last night, it ricocheted off the seats in Fenway.  That's why spring training homers sound so loud, those little stadiums are rarely full and the sound bounces off the seats which are metal and/or plastic.

The other variable is the microphone placement for the TV crews and where they're located.  No one here heard Gunnar's shot last night with their own ears unless you were at the stadium, you heard it through a TV microphone somewhere in Fenway and out through your TV speakers.  The closer that microphone is to the batter's box, the louder it'll be.

I'm sure a guy like Henderson sounds different than Phillips on average because he's bigger and stronger, but no one can tell me that a 110 EV from Stanton and a 110 EV from Phillips hit with the same type of bat on a pitch at the same velocity sounds drastically different.  

That's why Buck O'Neil said what he said about Bo Jackson.  He heard Bo hitting in batting practice, in an empty Royals stadium, the sound rifling off empty seats.  I'm gonna do a @DrungoHazewoodand be a baseball romantic killjoy,  but do we trust a man in his 70s and his memory of what Babe Ruth's bat and Josh Gibson's bat sounded like 50 or 60 years prior?  

No. 

But it makes a great story, it gets people right in their feelers.  Babe Ruth.  Josh Gibson.  Bo Jackson.  Wow.  

But I'm sure if Phil Rizzuto really got a hold of one at one point, it'd sound similar.

An acoustic bat could probably be designed so that even if Brett Phillips is hitting the ball at 90 EV it would sound way louder and better than say Stanton hitting the ball at 110.  That would blow the minds of the old timers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

And is the force vector in the same direction of the rotation of the earth or opposite, or something in between

Perhaps a West bound HR, sounds different than an East bound HR.

Also since sound it propagated by air, the direction of the wind relative to the observer (fan) needs to be accounted for.

Are you taking the Coriolis effect into account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Aglets said:

Force does indeed equal mass * acceleration.  Now assume you have two batted balls with equal exit velocities.  Is it your contention that one might spend a longer time in contact with the wood than the other which would lead to a significant difference in acceleration?

I guess the initial velocity from the pitch coming in is another variable actually. 

I'm going to go ahead and assume that the contact times are so close on same exit velocities as to be irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

An acoustic bat could probably be designed so that even if Brett Phillips is hitting the ball at 90 EV it would sound way louder and better than say Stanton hitting the ball at 110.  That would blow the minds of the old timers. 

If I were the Rays in their dome I'd totally replace normal air with some other mixture that includes inert(ish) gases like argon or helium or sulfur hexaflouride that have different acoustic properties to make the sound off the bat really wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If I were the Rays in their dome I'd totally replace normal air with some other mixture that includes inert(ish) gases like argon or helium or sulfur hexaflouride that have different acoustic properties to make the sound off the bat really wild.

Ah, but do dead men swing bats?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
    • Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣 I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft. All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?
    • Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division.  Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it.  But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 
    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...