Jump to content

Cionel Perez 2022


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I was somewhat surprised to see this thread didn’t exist already.   

I’m always a little uncomfortable when Cionel Perez enters a game, but for the most part, he’s been getting the job done.   Throwing two shutout innings with an automatic runner on 2B to begin the inning each time is no easy feat.  He did that today, and showed some passion doing it.   I’m pretty stoked about that!   He deserved to get the win.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say two things here. I don't miss Tanner Scott, and I enjoy watching Perez pitch. He may not have the best command, but the stuff can be plus at times. He's not going to be a clean inning guy often, but he's shown me the ability to bear down when he needs to. 

I also like the emotion out there a bit. You can see how important doing well is to him. 

Saying that, he's been pretty lucky as he's been hit pretty hard as his EV's and hard hit percentages are pretty bad. The slider has plus verticle (16% above avg) and Horizontal (59%) movement and he has 44% Whiff rate on the pitch, but when he's left it in the zone it's gotten hit hard. He's gotten some swings and misses on his fastball in the zone, but none on his slider which means he has to bury that pitch for it to be effective. 

Luckily for the most part he has, but his xBA (.298, xSLG (.458), xOBA (.368) and XBACON (.466) shows he's been pretty lucky so far. The high XBACON shows he very relient on Whiff for success so far. 

The Orioles have taken his chanegup away so he's a strict two pitch so far as the "sinker" that shows up in baseball savant are probably really just 4-seams that he just threw a little differntly. 

I do see some regression in his future, but his ability miss bats makes him valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Cionel does not get much respect on this board.  Tonight was an other incredible outing for him.  The guy has a 1.2 ERA for crying out loud.  Is there a better left handed mid-late LH reliever in the league right now?  He is an absolute beast.  Can we start giving him some kudos?

Edited by yark14
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s good..but not this good.

His FIP is about 2 runs higher than his actual ERA.  His xFIP is 2.5 runs higher. His xERA is 3.83.

His K rate is below average and his BB rate is above average.

He throws strikes at a below league average rate.  He misses bats at a slightly above average rate.
 

We talked about this with Lopez..Lopez didn’t have a lot of data in his stats that made you believe regression was in order.  Perez has a lot that says it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He’s good..but not this good.

His FIP is about 2 runs higher than his actual ERA.  His xFIP is 2.5 runs higher. His xERA is 3.83.

His K rate is below average and his BB rate is above average.

He throws strikes at a below league average rate.  He misses bats at a slightly above average rate.
 

We talked about this with Lopez..Lopez didn’t have a lot of data in his stats that made you believe regression was in order.  Perez has a lot that says it is.

Maybe offseasons trade candidate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losing Jorge Lopez hurt our bullpen depth.  However, the difference between Lopez, Perez, Kriehble, and Tate is negligible.   You want to argue Lopez is the best of the bunch?  No problem but it's not a big difference.  We just need Baker and Vespi to step in and provide the depth.

Perez, of course, is not a 1.15 era dominant pitcher but he's good.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Losing Jorge Lopez hurt our bullpen depth.  However, the difference between Lopez, Perez, Kriehble, and Tate is negligible.   You want to argue Lopez is the best of the bunch?  No problem but it's not a big difference.  We just need Baker and Vespi to step in and provide the depth.

Perez, of course, is not a 1.15 era dominant pitcher but he's good.

Don't forget Akin, he has been great and could start getting some higher leverage chances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Don't forget Akin, he has been great and could start getting some higher leverage chances. 

Right.  I did forget to mention him.   The thing is, if Vespi and Baker can take a step up, and I think Vespi despite one bad outing, has demonstrated he can be trusted.   Baker was coming along nicely and has had 3 straight appearances when he wasn't awful but couldn't get the job done.   You can see the potential to be a solid setup man though.   Those two give us the depth.  We lose a little without Lopez, mostly because Tate becomes more important in the 7th-8th inning where Bautista was before and I think that's a definite drop in effectiveness but the overall depth of the bullpen can still be very good.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Right.  I did forget to mention him.   The thing is, if Vespi and Baker can take a step up, and I think Vespi despite one bad outing, has demonstrated he can be trusted.   Baker was coming along nicely and has had 3 straight appearances when he wasn't awful but couldn't get the job done.   You can see the potential to be a solid setup man though.   Those two give us the depth.  We lose a little without Lopez, mostly because Tate becomes more important in the 7th-8th inning where Bautista was before and I think that's a definite drop in effectiveness but the overall depth of the bullpen can still be very good.

Your spot on about Vespi and Baker. Vespi had that one bad outing. Baker is just a guy that you have to have a short leash with. Some nights he can get you a big inning or two, but some nights you need Perez to come in and clean up his messes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relievers are fungible assets. The O's clearly have a formula to identify guys who are available at a low cost and deliver quality innings. Credit to Sig and company to find them and the PCs to get them to perform. The performance of the bullpen this year really points to the maturation of the organization as a whole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...