Jump to content

The two guys we got for Mancini look like keepers


2001OriolesFan

Recommended Posts

Seith Johnson has been ranked as our OVERALL 8th best prospect.  He is our third best pitching prospect.  He was the 40th player drafted in 2019.  Read a history/description of him at [    https://www.mlb.com/prospects/orioles/     }.  _(Click on his name and a window will pop up).   An excerpt from that contains:

Quote

Johnson always had the ingredients to succeed, including a fastball that touches 98 mph and sits in the mid-90s with carry at the top of the zone plus a swing-and-miss slider in the mid-80s that ticked up in velocity late last season. But he was bound to be a late bloomer due to his limited experience on the mound. So perhaps it’s unsurprising that he seemed to gain more confidence in and understanding of his arsenal, which also includes a changeup and a curveball, as his first full season progressed

I am happy with this guy alone for Mancini.  I can not understand all the bashing of this trade by people calling him just a low level A level pitcher. Why don't those people do a few keystrokes and get some information? 

 

The second guy in this trade is Chayce McDermott and our #11 overall prospect.   He is a 4th round draft pick (suplemental round) of the Astros.   He has some development work to do, and is less certain to get it all together.   

Quote

McDermott added 2-3 mph of velocity to his fastball in 2021, operating at 92-96 mph and topping out at 98 while maintaining mid-90s heat deep into games. He delivers his four-seamer on a flat approach angle, showing good carry up in the zone but getting hit when he doesn't locate well. He has a pair of promising secondary pitches with depth and does a better job of throwing strikes and getting chases with his low-80s slider than his mid-70s curveball.

Quote

Relatively inexperienced for a college pitcher because he worked just 139 innings in four years at Ball State, he could continue to clean up his delivery and emerge as a mid-rotation starter.

He is our 4th highest pitching prospect and was ranked just ahead of Bauman and Vavara.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I do like the trade there is an issue with Johnson.  He's at the point in his career in which he needs to be put on the 40 man roster and he's hurt and hasn't pitched past A ball.

Do they not protect him and risk losing him?

Might he end up on the ML roster before he's developmentally ready at some point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To friends and family not as immersed as us here, I've described it as good return, but for pitchers who are two years away.

Not much help for next year's 1425 innings, but mid-decade we'll see.    Maybe Santander-ish level guys for Grayson's Supporting Cast.

Since everything in the baseball world Mike Elias cares about so far is denominated in draft pool dollars, it's a $2mm return for Mancini.    Steve Cohen's 5X guess as the real value of rigged game draft pool dollars guesses Elias negotiated a ~$10mm surplus value return, which Mancini probably needs a few October big hits to provide Houston.     I forget if the visiting team gets a share of the Road Gate, but figure he'll put a few butts in seats when the Astros come in.

Obviously Johnson's TJ you have to ding him a little, but I feel the probability any Arm will have TJ sometime before they are 30-ish years old is well-baked into Club's assessments by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

While I do like the trade there is an issue with Johnson.  He's at the point in his career in which he needs to be put on the 40 man roster and he's hurt and hasn't pitched past A ball.

Do they not protect him and risk losing him?

Might he end up on the ML roster before he's developmentally ready at some point?

They will protect him, for sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

While I do like the trade there is an issue with Johnson.  He's at the point in his career in which he needs to be put on the 40 man roster and he's hurt and hasn't pitched past A ball.

Do they not protect him and risk losing him?

Might he end up on the ML roster before he's developmentally ready at some point?

It would be funny if the O’s didn’t add him to the 40 man roster and then the Rays take him in the rule 5. 
 

I could see him being left off the roster, Elias left Pop knowing damn well that he’d be taken but took the risk anyways so there’s precedent. 
 

If he’s added then that leaves 2 years where he can be optioned while he climbs the ladder from A ball while also being on an innings limit. That means he will have to sink or swim in a few years with no room for error because hopefully by that time, the O’s will actually be trying to compete and won’t have room for experiments in the bullpen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

While I do like the trade there is an issue with Johnson.  He's at the point in his career in which he needs to be put on the 40 man roster and he's hurt and hasn't pitched past A ball.

Do they not protect him and risk losing him?

Might he end up on the ML roster before he's developmentally ready at some point?

Could end up being a Bundy situation because of the injury and options. I think that’s why Johnson was available. I think you have to protect him or a team could pull and Orioles and draft and stash him. 
 

We got two big time arms but one is already hurt. Gotta keep them healthy and develop them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

If they put Johnson on the 40, can't they just transfer him to the 60 day DL to open up his spot?

Yes, but that still uses up a slot at that particular moment in time.

Also putting him on the 40 starts the clock for him needing to be on the ML roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

While I do like the trade there is an issue with Johnson.  He's at the point in his career in which he needs to be put on the 40 man roster and he's hurt and hasn't pitched past A ball.

Do they not protect him and risk losing him?

Might he end up on the ML roster before he's developmentally ready at some point?

Valid questions. But as you say, it is possible to also develop at the ML level. Harder and less convenient if we’re contending, but possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
    • Unfortunately it doesn’t sound like anything will be done before next year. The speakers at the park are an embarrassment.  
    • If they keep Ryan they can still get Mayo 350+ at bats. He can be full time DH vs LHP and play some at 1st and 3rd here and there. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...