Jump to content

Palmer on Mullins and Mountcastle offensive problems


wildcard

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I definitely get the feeling that Rutschman was ground zero.   Everyone who was here before him will be gone within the next 2 years.

I think anyone who doesn't fit the offensive approach now being taught will be gone within 2 years unless it's a backup catcher who is a good mentor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I definitely get the feeling that Rutschman was ground zero.   Everyone who was here before him will be gone within the next 2 years.

I think anyone who doesn't fit the offensive approach now being taught will be gone within 2 years unless it's a backup catcher who is a good mentor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why would they need a "good mentor" backup catcher in two years?

 

I probably worded that wrong but I feel like this organization will always have a good defensive catcher who is experienced and works well with the pitching staff as a backup and not have much regard for their offensive output. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

I probably worded that wrong but I feel like this organization will always have a good defensive catcher who is experienced and works well with the pitching staff as a backup and not have much regard for their offensive output. 

That's pretty much every team at all times.

If they can even get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Mountcastle is slumping, his AB's are very hard to watch. Can't stand his approach, reminds me way too much of the later days of the "run" when everyone was down 0-2 constantly and it was power or bust. But it was made more tolerable by Trumbo leading the league in bombs or AJ being a consistent power threat.  If Ryan can hit like last year, I say swing away. But this year the bad ABs are much more noticeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wildcard said:

Jim Palmer was saying on the game boardcast that the change in pitching coaches might have something to do with Mullins and Mountcastles problems at the plate this season.  

Hmmm, you might need to edit this sentence.  

Any way, a month ago Mountcastle was sporting an .811 OPS - was the coaching a problem for him then?  He’s a hot and cold hitter and, even though I have my issues with him, I have little doubt that he’ll heat up again. 

Mullins could be another story.  He’s been hitting way fewer barrels this year and his launch angle is way up.  I feel like he’s altered his approach from last year, and it’s not working.  
 

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Hmmm, you might need to edit this sentence.  

Any way, a month ago Mountcastle was sporting an .811 OPS - was the coaching a problem for him then?  He’s a hot and cold hitter and, even though I have my issues with him, I have little doubt that he’ll heat up again. 

Mullins could be another story.  He’s been hitting way fewer barrels this year and his launch angle is way up.  I feel like he’s altered his approach from last year, and it’s not working.  
 

I don't need to edit anything.  I was just reporting what Palmer said.  Take it up with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

I don't need to edit anything.  I was just reporting what Palmer said.  Take it up with him.

Read the sentence again.  Oh, and there’s also a typo, but that’s not what I’m talking about.  This isn’t subtle.  

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Nevermind, should have clicked the link before posting. 
    • Could he be back by the start of next season? I’m not sure of the exact recovery time for this procedure but I know it’s less than TJS. 
    • A player who is a FA after this year TB is not going to care where he goes. That said they only have Armstrong and Rosario. Potentially Maton. 
    • I don't think we really need to trade for CF just because we have so much depth at COF. We could promote Mayo or Kjerstad permanently and just see how they shake out, which wouldn't offensively be as bad as Mullins has been this year. Slide over Cowser to CF if we can't find that good a deal, and then go for anothter SP arm and some more depth in the pen. They don't trade Basallo because (and this is just me speculating) that they could move on from either Mountcastle or O'Hearn in the 2025-2026 offseason depending on if they can get a good return on them, like what we saw Tampa do with Austin Meadows a couple years back and the Orioles have a backup to replace said bat or bats.  In terms of who we go for, I don't really know. I don't like the idea of reuniting with Tanner Scott because his control issues and walk rate are still very present. I'm not in love with the idea of going for Kopech because the numbers and peripherals are average at best.  Carlos Estavez from the Angels, sure but how high is that asking price going to be? Whoever sells come deadline time could be interesting, as teams like the Cubs and Tigers could potentially be sellers come deadline time. Maybe even the mighty Astros who haven't been as good this year could be persuaded to sell off some talent depending on who we make available. It's a little to early to tell as of right now due to a good chunk of the sport sitting at around 500, but who knows at this point? 
    • I don’t think it will meaningfully affect who they are looking to deal at the trade deadline. The Orioles will be more inclined to include guys who they aren’t planning to add to the 40 as the last pieces in a deal, but there isn’t a huge crunch that means they NEED to clear 40 man roster space. Of all the guys after Hays on that list, I think Strowd and Young are the only ones who are high probability of being added right now. None of the other borderline guys have much trade value at all. Note Baker is out of options next year, he’s going to have to pitch well the rest of the year to warrant his spot.  I also think Luis González is going to get a look at some point and will ultimately become the new Vespi for 2025, optionable lefty riding the Norfolk shuttle. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...