Jump to content

Odor taking grounders at 3b


seak05

Recommended Posts

This is realizing he's a popular "glue" kind of player in the clubhouse and trying to give him a role that will both keep him on the team and diminish his playing time at 2B.    You guys should be happy.   This might mean more Vavra at 2B.  Nevin down or released.  Stowers up.   Odor backs up 3B behind Urias.  Still gets a start or 2 at 2B.   Maybe.   Or maybe it means nothing.

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, it is absolutely terrific news Odor is taking grounders at 3b, hope it goes well. I’d absolutely love Odor on this team as utility /PH, I think that is an ideal role for him honestly. Love him and his ability in the clutch. Who goes for him? Assuming Nevin. Is he DFA-Ed?

  • Upvote 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, ManciniFan said:

Wow, it is absolutely terrific news Odor is taking grounders at 3b, hope it goes well. I’d absolutely love Odor on this team as utility /PH, I think that is an ideal role for him honestly. Love him and his ability in the clutch. Who goes for him? Assuming Nevin. Is he DFA-Ed?

Not as a pinch hitter …. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way this is good news is if we are allowing him to get better at another position for whatever teams picks him up after we cut him ASAP.  Otherwise it's another way he keeps being in our lineup when at the best he needs to be on the bench, and reality need to be off the team all together.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, forphase1 said:

The only way this is good news is if we are allowing him to get better at another position for whatever teams picks him up after we cut him ASAP.  Otherwise it's another way he keeps being in our lineup when at the best he needs to be on the bench, and reality need to be off the team all together.  

I'd say it would be good in a sense if it means Nevin is off the team if Odor can backup at 3B. I'd prefer Odor and Nevin not to be on the roster, but at least this would get rid of one of them and allow for Stowers or another prospect to get called up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odor gets a lot of crap around here for his defense but it’s really his offense that has been the problem. He has a great arm and quick turn on double plays, it’s not just a coincidence that he is there and the team leads the league in turning them.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I'd say it would be good in a sense if it means Nevin is off the team if Odor can backup at 3B. I'd prefer Odor and Nevin not to be on the roster, but at least this would get rid of one of them and allow for Stowers or another prospect to get called up. 

Sure, getting rid of one of the black holes in the lineup is better than having both of them.  But as far as that goes it's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, kinda pointless.  Both of them need off of our roster, and making Odor more versatile so he can potentially stay in the lineup isn't a good sign.  Odor has a .618 OPS.  Tyler Nevin is .586.  So yeah, Odor is SLIGHTLY less bad at bat than Nevin, but doing any kind of experiment to work to keep either in the lineup is silly.  

Please note, I'm NOT comparing this season to the Titanic as I'm loving this team and watching us compete for the playoffs.  But it's a fact that Odor and Nevin are really, really bad with the bat in their hand and BOTH need off of the team and replaced.  Again, replacing one is a great start, but it shouldn't stop there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, survivedc said:

Odor gets a lot of crap around here for his defense but it’s really his offense that has been the problem. He has a great arm and quick turn on double plays, it’s not just a coincidence that he is there and the team leads the league in turning them.

He's bad all around.  He's worse with the bat than with the glove, but the glove is very over rated here on the OH.  Most of the fielding metrics have him a slightly below average to poor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Friedman and Dombrowski set a high bar, and the Astros are post peak.    Atlanta probably doesn't want to hear much about the Orioles misfortune. The Orioles level of play has been in the toilet half a season but I still think the good version of themselves is the AL's best positioned team to outplay the NL's best even this year.     We'll see if Soto and Judge are more than a 1-year thing, but even so that club has vulnerabilities.
    • I agree it's unlikely but not completely far fetched. I don't think he is a lock to get more than $20M in AAV, so he could decide to take it and then hit FA if he has a good or even better year. His talent level is in a similar range as the players who have accepted: Joc Pederson, Jose Abreu, Wieters etc.
    • Sort of a funny game to have come directly after a discussion of the merits of bunting with 1st and 2nd with nobody out. Glad Bob Melvin and I don’t see eye to eye on that issue…didn’t work out in his favor today.
    • Let's be honest, Gunnar ain't finishing second either.
    • Yeah, I don't think the Orioles' struggles against NL teams is very meaningful, but I do think the NL is stronger this year.  All the NL division leaders have looked formidable and steady throughout the season.  But also the Padres and Mets have kicked their seasons into another gear and have really impressed over the past couple of months.  Compare them to the Wild Card teams in the AL, and they just appear more formidable on paper.   Also the DBacks are pretty much outhitting everyone right now -- though that's been offset by their not so effective pitching.  
    • For sure he is out of consideration as the MVP favorite to copy Cal.  Of course,  Cal didn't have an Aaron Judge to compete with.  The runner-up in MVP voting in 1983 was a guy named Eddie Murray.  Eddie had more HR, more RBI, a higher slugging and OPS than Cal, but Cal had a higher WAR and batting average (.318 to .303).  I wonder if Eddie is bitter about losing the MVP to Cal?  A case could be made for either one. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...