Jump to content

Gambling coming to OPACY?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I just wish Draft Kings and Fan Duel would come up with some better commercials.  At least they got rid of the one where the manager and the ump are arguing over nothing, and the very irritating hostess of the last several Draft Kings ads.  The current ones are more boring and unfunny, rather than affirmatively obnoxious.  

Jessie Coffield (the previous hostess) might be coming back. She had a baby recently, which is why the new boring guy has replaced her for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

Jessie Coffield (the previous hostess) might be coming back. She had a baby recently, which is why the new boring guy has replaced her for now.

I don’t know if it’s her or the writing but those commercials are really annoying.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The constant updating of odds and the play by play gambling opportunities are what bother me. Live bets, exotic plays and companies like barstool are really preying on young (mostly) men who can now casually get into it.

As someone who used to bet pretty often, it became hard to enjoy sports if you didn’t have anything riding on it. Took me a while to get over that and now I’ll bet on an NFL game or two a week.

Mostly just wish the gambling weren’t so in your face and you could just follow the game for the stories and athletic feats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The level of greed in MLB and sports in general has gotten out of hand.  A sports book at a stadium is another reason not to take kids to a sporting event.  

Gambling should be nowhere near the playing field, and the only way I would support MLB promoted legalized gambling at all is if it lowered ticket prices, prompted baseball to be on regular local TV again, and/or was largely spent on youth sports leagues.  Of course, none of these things will happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

Jessie Coffield (the previous hostess) might be coming back. She had a baby recently, which is why the new boring guy has replaced her for now.

We see so many of these commercials because nobody else is apparently buying ad time.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think the Orioles have a big incentive to make sure all the addicted gamblers come to their games. Well, at least until they're completely destitute.

You do know that tons of people gamble and do it responsibly and don’t lose everything, right?  
 

Your over the top scenarios apply to very few people overall.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

The level of greed in MLB and sports in general has gotten out of hand.  A sports book at a stadium is another reason not to take kids to a sporting event.  

Gambling should be nowhere near the playing field, and the only way I would support MLB promoted legalized gambling at all is if it lowered ticket prices, prompted baseball to be on regular local TV again, and/or was largely spent on youth sports leagues.  Of course, none of these things will happen. 

Camden Yards was paid for, at least in theory, by lottery proceeds.  So, yeah!, free stadium.  Paid for by the folks lining up at the grocery store to play their numbers. 483 of them.  When you're in line behind them and just want to pay your $3 for milk before it curdles. I don't know, maybe Memorial Stadium wasn't so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Except baseball isn’t that popular.  

You get it! Baseball would be in great shape if a huge gambling scandal hit because everyone under 40 would just keep going to all those games and watching on TV less than the NFL, NBA, soccer, NASCAR, movies, streaming, social media, etc.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

You get it! Baseball would be in great shape if a huge gambling scandal hit because everyone under 40 would just keep going to all those games and watching on TV less than the NFL, NBA, soccer, NASCAR, movies, streaming, social media, etc.

Do you sit on a rocking chair on your front porch yelling at kids to “get off your lawn”?

As I read your comments on this thread, that’s how I’m picturing you.     :)

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You do know that tons of people gamble and do it responsibly and don’t lose everything, right?  
 

Your over the top scenarios apply to very few people overall.

Sure. Just like relatively few people who pick up a beer are alcoholics, and many people who smoke don't get lung cancer.  Most people will not bankrupt their family at the Orioles sportsbook.  Some will. 

But then the Orioles and MLB start counting on this revenue stream. The bookkeepers and the marketers immediately start thinking of ways to increase gambling revenues, take more risks.  As cable money declines, attendance stagnates or declines across the league, and streaming doesn't make up for it, gambling may well slide in and fill that gap.  What happens in 2030 or 2040 if gambling money is  30%, 40% or more of revenues? Every day people are putting big money on the Orioles to lose.  People are putting not-insignificant money on the closer to blow today's save?  With all this being not only legal, but out in the open and the teams are heavily incentivized to keep the revenues flowing someone is going to look the other way when some poor schlub puts his entire $2M retirement savings on some rookie making MLB minimum striking out to lead off the game and... whatta you know, he does strike out.  Or even better, some ump making $250k a year and he's officiating a play that someone put 10 times that down on the outcome.

There's a reason that the early professional leagues very publicly distanced themselves from gambling, and MLB has done that for nearly 150 years.  Backtracking on this will probably be fine for most people most of the time.  Until it isn't.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Who really cares what the payroll is?  And if you do,  why?  If we hadn't been swept out of the playoffs would we even be arguing this?  In the end the amount the Os pay isn't the issue or problem.  It's how the team performs on the field.  Sure we all know that payroll and wins have a fairly strong correlation to each other,  but it isn't exact or perfect at all.   Should we increase payroll?  Sure,  provided you makes the team better.  But increasing the payroll while not improving the team by doing so seems goofy.   Sign a #1 or #2, absolutely.   Move on from the platoon at 1st with a guy who can take up one roster spot and hit both rhp and lhp,  like Walker?  Sign me up.  Sign an impact OF and split at bats between Mullins, Cowser, Kjerstad and him?  Sounds good to me.   Replace Mountcastle with just a more expensive version of the same?  What's the point?  Sign an expensive pitcher to replace Povich with the same results?  Why,  other then a depth move?  I'm all for signing free agents and spending money,  just do it wisely and don't do it just to say we signed someone.   Actually improve the team or stand pat.  Making moves just to make moves is how you end up with Rogers types. Payroll matters, yeah.   But winning matters more.   If we can win with a 100M payroll, fine.   If it needs to be 200M to win,  that's fine with me too.  Just win games,  and let the window we have stay open as long as possible... and most importantly win the WS for the first time since 1983.  
    • If service time comes into play he would not be Arb eligible until 2026. No reason to  tender, just pick him up at Min wage.
    • Smith and Bowman signed Milb contacts, stop period. which means if they not have 6 years MLB service they make minor league money if they are in the minors. Albert signed a one guarenteed contract, 740k. Itwas A Milb contract to keep him off the 40. Even if he got DFA or never pitched one inning of MLB he still makes the 740k. He was good enough to demand this contract and get it. Smith and Bowman were not.
    • Just because you sign as a free agent doesn’t mean you aren’t subject to the rules around 6 years of service time. For instance, I don’t believe Burch Smith or Matt Bowman can elect free agency unless they are outrighted, released, or non-tendered. However, there are examples of foreign professionals being eligible to elect free agency early - for example Shintaro Fujinama last year.  It’s not part of the CBA, but presumably the commissioner will approve that special covenant as part of an FA deal if the player has at least 6 years of experience in foreign league.  It’s possible they would let Suarez combine his 1 year MLB service time (prior to this season) with his 3 years in NPB and 2 years in KBO.  And it’s possible they let Suarez write these terms into an MILB contract that had split MLB terms.  It wouldn’t have been my starting assumption, but it seems plausible.
    • Here I am checking in. We and our condo on the east side of Asheville made it through unscathed. On Tuesday we flew into DC and moved into a hotel in Falls Church. Our son, Eric, ordered us to make that trip and made all the arrangements because we had no internet and limited cell service. We expected to stay a week while electricity is restored and then we learned about the dire water situation. We are moving in with Eric and his family who have been supporting us in every way possible, anticipating needs and things that would help us. Our daughter, Robyn, and her husband, Ken live about 30 miles west of Asheville , Waynesville, had no damage, never lost power or water. Today they rescued my car from $30 a day hourly parking, threw out everything that was beginning to make the condo stink and tied up  a few ends we left loose when we left Dodge in a hurry. They are, collectively, the loving, supportive family everyone should want and have .
    • You should really try to read. It will make you less slow.
    • Just pointing out that not everyone wanted Adley extended last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...