Jump to content

5 Players the O's Need to add to the Roster to Push for the Wild Card


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

Hall can get a strikeout at any time. Situationally, he can be an asset on the MLB roster. Especially in extra innings where you start with a guy on second. Right now, Bautista is that guy that can get us out of those jams,  but he can’t do it every time. He’s also starting to throw multiple innings to close out a game. I wouldn’t trust Hall for more than a batter or two, but he’d be one of their best options situationally. Plus, he’s a lefty.

Edited by dzorange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, rm5678 said:

I don't think Odor will be DFA'd. His clubhouse presence would be sorely missed.

Odor is not going anywhere IMO. Nevin goes down for Gunnar and Odor will lose some at bats in September, but the Orioles are not going to mess with the winning juju right now. Odor will stay on the team and still play about half time IMO. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ohfan67 said:

Odor is not going anywhere IMO. Nevin goes down for Gunnar and Odor will lose some at bats in September, but the Orioles are not going to mess with the winning juju right now. Odor will stay on the team and still play about half time IMO. 

The juju sure took a bit hit when they traded Mancini and Lopez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Hall can get a strikeout at any time. Situationally, he can be an asset on the MLB roster. Especially in extra innings where you start with a guy on second. Right now, Bautista is that guy that can get us out of those jams,  but he can’t do it every time. He’s also starting to throw multiple innings to close out a game. I wouldn’t trust Hall for more than a batter or two, but he’d be one of their best options situationally. Plus, he’s a lefty.

You want to put a guy out there to pitch the 10th inning with a runner on base who has thrown 10 wild pitches, 48 BBs, 2 balks, and 2 HBP(I'm surprised this number is so low) this year in 75 AAA innings?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

The juju sure took a bit hit when they traded Mancini and Lopez.

Neither one of those guys had juju. You know it, I know it, and juju knows it.

 

But seriously...I suspect you would agree that the Orioles are not going to cut Odor this season. They have stuck with him through 126 games. They are not going to remove him from the roster IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Hall can get a strikeout at any time. Situationally, he can be an asset on the MLB roster. Especially in extra innings where you start with a guy on second. Right now, Bautista is that guy that can get us out of those jams,  but he can’t do it every time. He’s also starting to throw multiple innings to close out a game. I wouldn’t trust Hall for more than a batter or two, but he’d be one of their best options situationally. Plus, he’s a lefty.

Hall can give up a walk at any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

You want to put a guy out there to pitch the 10th inning with a runner on base who has thrown 10 wild pitches, 48 BBs, 2 balks, and 2 HBP(I'm surprised this number is so low) this year in 75 AAA innings?  

I want a guy out there with a runner on second and no out who can strike a batter out.

Edited by dzorange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connelly had an interesting piece in the Athletic comparing the situation in 2012 with Manny and the current situation with Gunnar. His point, (its behind a pay wall or I would post) is that Manny was brought up to play defense primarily at 3B. Reynolds and Benemit were terrible there and apparently they viewed Manny as a Defense first player and did not expect him to hit.

Conversely, the 2022 O's have a very solid defense currently. They need offense much more than defense from Gunnar. Connelly states that he thinks that is a very big ask of a young player to come up in the middle of a pennant race and be the offensive savior. I think it's a very fair analysis.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, emmett16 said:

DL Hall just came into 1-1 game in 8th and proceeded to walk lead-off batter, throw a ground ball, give up a double, and then throw two wild pitches to allow the 3rd run to score.  Not sure he helps out much this season at the MLB level.  He's got some demons to contend with before he should be exposed to MLB hitters.

If he can't step up, then Vespi needs to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, wildcard said:

Roster expands by one position player and one pitcher.   Who goes to get the other three pitchers on the active roster

Currently Nevin and Rico Garcia for sure.  I feel like Hall and Vespi need to battle it out for the last LHP Reliever role

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dzorange said:

Hall can get a strikeout at any time. Situationally, he can be an asset on the MLB roster. Especially in extra innings where you start with a guy on second. Right now, Bautista is that guy that can get us out of those jams,  but he can’t do it every time. He’s also starting to throw multiple innings to close out a game. I wouldn’t trust Hall for more than a batter or two, but he’d be one of their best options situationally. Plus, he’s a lefty.

Right now Bautista and Baker are the only two avg a K/9 over 9 (12.0 and 9.91 respectively). It drops down pretty quick after that.  Hall is averging 14.8 K/9 at Norfolk over 70+ IP. He struck out 6 in 3.2 IP in his lone start.  I agree, if situational, he's the shutdown reliever that can truly replace Lopez and give Bautista a bit of a break. I think it also takes pressure off of Krehbiel, Akin, and Baker a bit where they can be used in some more low leverage situations to build momentum and confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, ScGO's said:

4. Matt Harvey - I still try to remind people that he had a 4.60 FIP last year without the new Wall.  He also didn't have quite the defense behind him either. Matt Harvey has pitched and pitched well in the World Series. I really think if last year's Harvey pitched for this year's O's he would have been just like Jordan Lyles. His numbers are great at Norfolk, but he's had some great starts. I think he could help give us innings down the stretch if there is a need.

Since 2017 his FIP is 5.32, and in Norfolk he's sporting a 4.84 ERA.  The most likely outcome of Harvey in the majors this year is an ERA north of 5.00.  He's a mopup pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He had a good ERA.  I think his FIP was 3.66 the one year and 4.66 the other.   
    • I don’t understand why Basallo is untouchable. Don’t we have Adley. Trade Basallo for a #2 if possible asap.
    • Difference in trading vets from a team still in rebuild mode versus trading vets from a team with World Series aspirations.  We've not seen him trade vets since the rebuild ended.
    • Understood. But here's the thing (given the current economic structure of the game) there are three ways to handle payroll for a winning team (as I see them). One is the Rays/Brewers/Guardians way. Where you have maybe one long term substantive contract (mostly done while player is young and before he has made real money or achieved real fame) and most of the time the contract is an exploitive type deal with a kid from another country who comes from a context of poverty (not judging it is what it is). These teams continuously are reloading/retooling/ and have constant roster reshaping and turnover. The goal is to make the postseason and hopeful every once in a blue moon the stars align while you are there and you may be able to go all the way! While these teams are often good, they are rarely great. And are even less willing to do what it takes to get them over the top IMO. The proof is in the fact that this model has never led to championship success (unless you want to use the Marlins of over 20 years ago from 03'). Another model is the "big spenders model", who spend seriously and have World Series aspirations. Some spend all on FA (like the Padres/Mets) and are super aggressive with trades hoping to augment their talent as they chase championships, but rarely does this work because the foundation of the team is usually built so poorly. They may be good for a season or shorter term but struggle to sustain. Then there are teams like the Phillies/Dodgers who do a combo of developing and spending (let's call that the best of both worlds). Obviously this is the most preferable because you get the short and long term rewards. But it may not be realistic to think that the O's could ever do/have what it takes to fully do both. Then there is the Braves and Astros model. Still a higher payroll but minimizing of risks through extending younger players (Braves) or avoiding most long term contracts (Astros) but paying higher salaries on shorter deals. Obviously both franchises have been successful (won WS). Having said all this the reality exists that if/when you do longer term contracts (extensions or FA deals) for franchise/cornerstone/superstar type players, you most likely won't get the best value on the back end (think Paul Goldschmidt this year). That's just the economics of the game. But the thing is, the owners (especially our new group) have the money and then some to write off those things and keep rolling as "the cost of doing business".  When examining all winners of the World Series in the last decade a pattern is pretty apparent (with exception of the Astros first championship in 17') you have to spend in order to win. 
    • An alternative... also from the Rangers:  Nathan Eovaldi.  FA after this season but has a $20m vesting option for 2025 if he throws 300 innings combined between '23 & '24.  It'll be close.  Between Scherzer (40 this month) and Eovaldi (34) who would you prefer? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...