Jump to content

Mountcastle


Joep

Recommended Posts

Mountcastle can't catch up with a fastball.. best he can do is foul tip it....of course the outside slider is still a problem for him....is he not able to see a fastball or is he just too slow to react....this is very bad news

Edited by Joep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Trey Mancini, 2018.  .242/.299/.416, .715 OPS, 95 OPS+, 24 homers, 44 BB, 153 Ks in 636 PAs. Age 26.

Ryan Mountcastle, 2022. .244/.291/.421, .712 OPS, 100 OPS+.  18 homers, 29 walks 122 Ks in 475 PAs. Age 25.

I'd certainly rather see if Mountcastle can bounce back rather than, say, try to resign Mancini to a three or four year deal starting at 31. A trade of Mountcastle at this point is probably selling low.  His '22 xwOBA is .347 and other batted ball metrics are positive, good chance he hits better going forward.

 

Are you forgetting 2017 Mancini? 

Mountcastle has never put numbers has good has those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Trey Mancini, 2018.  .242/.299/.416, .715 OPS, 95 OPS+, 24 homers, 44 BB, 153 Ks in 636 PAs. Age 26.

Ryan Mountcastle, 2022. .244/.291/.421, .712 OPS, 100 OPS+.  18 homers, 29 walks 122 Ks in 475 PAs. Age 25.

I'd certainly rather see if Mountcastle can bounce back rather than, say, try to resign Mancini to a three or four year deal starting at 31. A trade of Mountcastle at this point is probably selling low.  His '22 xwOBA is .347 and other batted ball metrics are positive, good chance he hits better going forward.

 

I asked this in the game thread yesterday.

What value does he have to any team at this point? A free swinging first baseman who's not currently hitting for a ton of power. We always talk about trading RM and Hays but I dont see what value they offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RM deserves his share of criticism, but the OP's is not based in reality.

RM has incredible plate coverage and a very, very quick bat.

His problem is he makes bad swing decisions constantly, even when he's hitting well.

His plate coverage and bat speed have always allowed him to get away with it.  And even here, it's not like he's a bad hitter, just not what you want at 1b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Average players get exposed and struggle to adjust.

Good players get exposed and adjust with success only to be exposed again and the cycle continues.

Great players will figure out what the opposing team is doing, adjust and are better hitters for it. The cycle continues but they continue to win the battle.

 

Mountcastle sits on the cusp of being a really good player. Time will tell.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Oriole1940 said:

He would not be a Regular on a real good team.  So limited.

The Astros have given 468 to Yuli Gurriel at 1b who is hitting .244 w 7 HR.

The Yankees have given 375 PAs to Aaron Hicks who is OPSing .638 with negative defense. 

Every good team has some meh players. 

I also want to see Mountcastle do better and I won't be surprised if he is replaced via FA or trade in the next couple years. But I don't get how people are labeling him "the problem."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If RM has such a quick bat...why is he late so much with fastballs....seems to only got well when pitchers hang a curve or slider...but most good hitters love a fastball and take advantage when there over the plate....RM swings through or foul tips those fastballs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

The Astros have given 468 to Yuli Gurriel at 1b who is hitting .244 w 7 HR.

The Yankees have given 375 PAs to Aaron Hicks who is OPSing .638 with negative defense. 

Every good team has some meh players. 

I also want to see Mountcastle do better and I won't be surprised if he is replaced via FA or trade in the next couple years. But I don't get how people are labeling him "the problem."

It might have something to do with him slashing .173/.241/.280/.521 with a 13 BB to 44 K ratio in his last 166 PAs since July 12th while the team has been struggling to score runs in a wild card chase.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...