Jump to content

Two Hall of Famers in one draft?


Three Run Homer

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Remember The Alomar said:

I love the sentiment behind this topic, but as a I joked in a recent game thread, I now need to start a "We Should Send Mountcastle to Be Tried and Sentenced at the Hague" thread to balance out OH's cosmic energy. 

All these positive threads on Orioles prospects and I'm nervous we're going to tempt the baseball gods into doing something harmful against the team.

I'm not used to an Orioles organization loaded with prospects from Rookie Ball all the way up to MLB. 

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Remember The Alomar said:

I love the sentiment behind this topic, but as a I joked in a recent game thread, I now need to start a "We Should Send Mountcastle to Be Tried and Sentenced at the Hague" thread to balance out OH's cosmic energy. 

Hahahahahhahahahahaha we love our hyperbole

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Adley and Gunnar are a long way from the hall of fame. The odds of both of them making it are probably like 1%

According to the Baseball Hall of Fame, there have been about 22,000 players who have played in MLB, and 268 have made it to the HOF (1.2%).  

If my math is correct, assuming either player making it to the HOF is an independent event, you multiply 1.2% x 1.2% to determine the chance that BOTH are hall of famers, which is 0.0144%. That's like 6900 to 1 odds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Adley and Gunnar are a long way from the hall of fame. The odds of both of them making it are probably like 1%

What percentage of players in MLB history are Hall of Famers?  There are 268 players who've been inducted as players.  Probably a handful more who were really players but pre-1876, so let's just say 275.  Gunnar Hendeson was the 22,806th player in MLB history according to Baseball Reference.  That means 1% of MLB players get a plaque, give or take.

We know that Henderson (and Rutschman) are more highly regarded than an average MLB player, far more, really.  Those 22,806 includes Jeff Tackett, Ryan Flaherty, Caleb Joseph, David Newhan.  Players who had essentially 0% chance of going to the Hall when they were called up.  They were often just too old to have 10 productive years, and just not talented enough.

If you look at #1 overall picks there were 45 between 1965 and 2010.  ARod, Chipper, Griffey, Mauer, Baines... all either HOFers, soon to be, or would be if not for PEDs.  Bryce Harper is a probable HOFer.  Strasburg, Cole, Correa, Price... plausible.  So among #1 picks we're looking at let's say seven out of 45, or 16%.  

#2 there are three out of 45, or 7%.  But think about it... these draft comps aren't that gret because even top picks have to navigate the minors, and many don't get there with the fanfare of Gunnar or Adley. There have been five #2s through 2015 who never played in the majors.  Another 15 or so didn't really do anything in the majors. Pick a name... Tyler Houston.  #2 overall in '89, had a .686 OPS in the minors, didn't reach the majors until 1996, clearly not on Gunnar or Adley's level as a prospect.

What would probably be useful is to look at Baseball America top five overall prospects and see what level of success they had.  But I don't know of a simple way to do that.

They've been handing out Rookie of the Year awards since 1947, one for MLB the first two years, one for each league since so 134 total.  We don't have a great gauge on the careers of the recent ones, so lets knock off the last 14 and stop at 2015.  Roughly 25 of them are or will/should be HOFers, or 21%.  

So I haven't really quantified their odds, but it has to be much more than 1%.  Just not quite sure how much more.  I'd guess something like 10-20%.  If they have a solid first 2-3 years that will go up pretty rapidly.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...