Jump to content

83-79


Ripken

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jagwar said:

I don't think it was about being worn down. They overachieved and didn't have a playoff caliber roster. Put 2 more reliable starters in the rotation and replace a few hitters with one to two 800+ OPS players, and this team is dancing. 

Statcast says Mountcastle was neutral luck away from a .800 OPS season this year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

83-79 is a great result given expectations.  They played fun and competitive ball, and though at the very end they slipped, the fact that they were even in the WC conversation so late in the season is commendable.

As for next year, whether they can make the jump to the next level will depend on Elias, and if the owners will spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jagwar said:

Absolutely. I'm pretty sure that we may have seen the last of players who don't produce. McKenna, Odor, Nevin.

Even Hays, Vavra and Mountcastle need to be working their arses off this offseason. 

McKenna is not in the same group with Odor and Nevin. McKenna is a useful bench player because he provides plus defense and base running, and can play all the OF positions. He also has pronounced splits against over his professional career (excluding 2021) so he can be matched up against LHP. Odor and Nevin do not belong on the MLB roster.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The O's were basically a couple of bad series against the Tigers and A's away from the playoff.  I feel like the O's were worn down at the end of the season more than anything.  The will to win was still there, but there was no energy reserve left.  Here's to a great offseason (counting on Elias and Angelos) and an even better 2023. 

Tampa finished the season going 8-17 so even good teams can have bad stretches.  People are going to focus on the games we lost to bad teams, but every team, yes even the Dodgers and Astros, have series like that during the long 162 game season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Not seeing 80 in the loss column is awesome. It’s only one win but 83-79 looks better than 82-80. 

When you get into the 70's for losses, mentally you can talk yourself into thinking your team is right on the edge of winning 90 games. A 72 loss season means you're a 90 win team assuming 162 games played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdwilde1 said:

McKenna is not in the same group with Odor and Nevin. McKenna is a useful bench player because he provides plus defense and base running, and can play all the OF positions. He also has pronounced splits against over his professional career (excluding 2021) so he can be matched up against LHP. Odor and Nevin do not belong on the MLB roster. 

But... he can't hit. I'd rather sign or trade for an outfielder with an OPS above  800 who can push Hays into McKenna's role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

When you get into the 70's for losses, mentally you can talk yourself into thinking your team is right on the edge of winning 90 games. A 72 loss season means you're a 90 win team assuming 162 games played. 

Now think of all the winnable games we lost. We could have easily been 5 games better, 88-74

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One way to look at it is that we were three runs away from making the playoffs. We lost opening day 2-1 to Tampa and then we lost to them in extra innings on July 27. If we score two more runs on opening day and one more run in the first nine innings of that extra inning loss, we make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

This season is exactly what they needed going forward to build confidence. Getting into the "playoffs" (wc game) to be one and done would not do much. It's better for them to be hungry next year, to get into the playoffs and go deep in it.

They don't have the one and done anymore. I believe it's a 3 game series now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SteveA said:

Tampa finished the season going 8-17 so even good teams can have bad stretches.  People are going to focus on the games we lost to bad teams, but every team, yes even the Dodgers and Astros, have series like that during the long 162 game season.

Tampa’s nosedive to close the season only makes me feel worse about the way our season ended. Despite our putrid offense the last month, we only finished 3 games behind Tampa. What coulda been…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The last column is IRS, which means “inherited runners scored”  Inherited runners would be IR and I am surprised that I didn’t see it anywhere in that column. This particular site has a different set of initials, IRS means inherited runners scored. I don’t think that can possibly be correct, because that would be a huge number.
    • LOL. 1.  I never said Basallo was an elite athlete. 2. I’ve said I’d like to see Basallo improve his plate discipline similar to what he showed 2nd half last year. 3. Basallo also needs to keep improving defensively. 4. I hope Basallo can improve over the 2nd half of the season. 5. I’d like to see Holliday cut down the strikeouts and get his average over .300 6.  I think he has a flaw in his mechanics which causes him to pull off the ball.  I hope he corrects it.   Where’s the problem?
    • Trust me, you missed nothing by missing the Coliseum.   Why “should” we have swept Seattle?   They’re leading their division, playing in their park.  I’m really happy to have taken 2 of 3.  Losing the 2-0 lead was disappointing but the offense just didn’t do much in that game and obviously the pen had a bad day.   More generally, I never “expect” a sweep of any opponent.   Sure, I hope for some sweeps, and we’ve had some.  But even a team like Oakland wins more than 1/3 of its games, and the odds basically never favor a sweep even when a really good team faces a really bad one.   Just win the game in front of us, that’s my plan.   
    • I'm going to somebody other than Akin.  Perez wasn't available since he pitched in back to back games. Same goes for Kimbrel.  I generally like Cano when he hasn't had a ton of rest which hurts sinkerballers, so he'd be a decent option.  In order of preference there: Webb Cano Let Baker finish it out Akin  Tate I reckon Hyde had that Showalter in him and was hoping to use Webb in the 9th. But I'm really opposed to just slotting guys into innings and more about putting them in based on effectiveness and situation. High leverage is really going against guys like Akin. 
    • BBref game logs, you can click and highlight by month or whatever stretch of starts that you want.
    • That works, though I'd really prefer it if we didn't trade within the division, if possible.  I'd rather our prospects helped other teams rather than rivals.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...