Jump to content

Ryan Mountcastle 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm giving you data.

Actual data.

Not hyperbole. 

Nothing prideful in that.  I didn't create Statcast.  A 10 year old could find the data I provided for you.

I provided data too. Yet, you seem to be caught up with ignoring it because you feel you always gotta be right.

Humble yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Sometimes I feel like the board is divided into two camps, those who ignore Mountcastle’s flaws and those who exagggerate them. 
 

To be honest, my view/opinion of Mountcastle is way more variable than for most other current and former Orioles. Part of it is the streakiness of his hitting, but a small part of it has something to do with his personality. He's kind of a goofball personality no matter how he's hitting, which sometimes I find admirable but sometimes I think I want him to look miserable and he doesn't! Regardless, it's pretty irrational on my part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2023 at 11:59 AM, RZNJ said:

Hays and Mountcastle have each played 20 games.   Mountcastle has 3 walks and 22 strikeouts.   Hays has 5 walks and 22 strikeouts.  Yet Hays is hitting .311 with a .935 OPS while Mountcastle is .212 and .704.      No conclusions.  Just thought it was interesting.

These are two guys who are pretty good when healthy but are also streaky and vulnerable.  Two guys who should be hearing footsteps from Norfolk and below.  It's a good spot to be in.  Both of these guys can help us if healthy and playing well.  We simply need them to be more consistent and that has been the issue.  Hays because he has struggled to stay 100% healthy and Mountcastle because his plate discipline is not great.

 

On 4/23/2023 at 1:36 PM, jrobb21613 said:

Who would you suggest  replace him?

There are options maybe not great today, but coming in the future for sure.  I don't worry about it long term and if Mounty was injured I think O'hearn or Kjerstad would be deployed.  I just think both of these guys are just routinely misvalued (not a great word) here.  Like someone said earlier, they are either overlooking their issues or overstating them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Good analysis of Mountcastle here, concluding that he’s been as unlucky as his wOBA/xwOBA differential suggests.  But, the lack of walks is a self-inflicted wound.  https://blogs.fangraphs.com/ryan-mountcastle-is-having-a-weird-one/

Quote

Mountcastle is hitting plenty of balls in the air, but he’s only pulled three fly balls so far this season. Two of those, incidentally, became home runs. So he should hit more of those, I guess.

Maybe impacted by the wall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, owknows said:

Mountcastle....

monster hero of the first half of of the month...

frozen fish for the last half...

Isn't this who he's always been?

A streak machine?

If you can endure the valley weeks.. the peak weeks are amazing.

 

What I care about is the bottom line after all the hot and cold spells are in.  I’ve been hoping the cold streaks would be shorter this year.  We’ll see if they are.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

What I care about is the bottom line after all the hot and cold spells are in.  I’ve been hoping the cold streaks would be shorter this year.  We’ll see if they are.  

For sure...  And he's earned enough latitude that I think we'll find out.

The most immediate other options are mostly AAAAish journeymen anyway.

Perhaps a clever manager could game his streakiness by shifting his position in the order in accordance with the prevailing pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked xwOBA on the Savant glossary, and it is silent on the metric considering direction.

Getting to read the prior linked Michael Baumann feature a bit closer, it had the split that measured by Home Runs per Fly Ball, Pulled beats Oppo 30-4.    The centerfielder, on the warning track, with his glove.

One of the Fangraphs commenters grabbed this play as an example of one xwOBA loves, but is mostly harmless IRL.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/sporty-videos?playId=48dd1fa4-7309-49c0-a763-5c043270fb60

I think it is probably reasonable to expect without closer to league average pull proficiency, he's doubtful to get all the way to his xwOBA.

Definition

Expected Weighted On-base Average (xwOBA) is formulated using exit velocity, launch angle and, on certain types of batted balls, Sprint Speed.

In the same way that each batted ball is assigned an expected batting average, every batted ball is given a single, double, triple and home run probability based on the results of comparable batted balls since Statcast was implemented Major League wide in 2015. For the majority of batted balls, this is achieved using only exit velocity and launch angle. As of 2019, "topped" or "weakly hit" balls also incorporate a batter's seasonal Sprint Speed.

Edited by Just Regular
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2023 at 2:21 PM, owknows said:

Mountcastle....

monster hero of the first half of of the month...

frozen fish for the last half...

Isn't this who he's always been?

A streak machine?

If you can endure the valley weeks.. the peak weeks are amazing.

 

Yeah, I think he still is who he's always been. Which is a .300-.320 OBP, .750-.775 OPS player. Which ultimately is totally replaceable given the prospects the organization has.

At the trade deadline, I'd be trading away Urias, Santander, Mountcastle, and Mateo in that order (and Frazier in a salary dump). The Orioles need to properly allocate resources and open up playing time for the multiple top shelf prospects the organization has close to the majors.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

Yeah, I think he still is who he's always been. Which is a .300-.320 OBP, .750-.775 OPS player. Which ultimately is totally replaceable given the prospects the organization has.

At the trade deadline, I'd be trading away Urias, Santander, Mountcastle, and Mateo in that order (and Frazier in a salary dump). The Orioles need to properly allocate resources and open up playing time for the multiple top shelf prospects the organization has close to the majors.

Mike Elias and staff have proven they value Major League experience above all else, so I do not see any scenario where the dump all their Major League players in favor of talented young prospects until all those prospects have proven they are Major League regulars and starters of equal or greater value themselves.

For all his faults, and all his successes/talents, Ryan Mountcastle is here to stay as part of this team for a given length of time. I'm still happily celebrating his walk in last night's game that turned into a run scored when Anthony Santander blasted that home run right afterwards. My hope is that Ryan will see the value in taking a walk when they give it to him from here on out.

I also don't think people give enough credit to Mountcastle for his glove. He digs alot of shorthops and bad throws out of the dirt for our infielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2023 at 10:50 AM, Frobby said:

Good analysis of Mountcastle here, concluding that he’s been as unlucky as his wOBA/xwOBA differential suggests.  But, the lack of walks is a self-inflicted wound.  https://blogs.fangraphs.com/ryan-mountcastle-is-having-a-weird-one/

Anecdotally, my frustration with Mounty at-bats is very similar to my Adam Jones frustrations from bygone days. It's a tease / tantalizing hope and prayer that if they can just learn to just lay off the out-of-the-zone offerings pitchers are serving (because they have a track record of fishing for them), pitchers would be forced to give in and throw them something they could barrel up, or, walk them.

Instead, it's like me when I see a tall blonde playing beach volleyball, I have no known defenses, puppy chasing fire truck, and I get (justifiably) smacked in the nuts by the wife. Then you see, on my face, the exact same look you see on Mounty's when he flails at yet another strike three that is two zip codes distant from the strike zone.

Now, to bring this current, watching Adley, Gunnar, and even Vavra, work counts, take pitches, and lay off the non-competitive crap, the contrast with Mountcastle is even brighter and even clearer. If Heston Kjerstad has the AR, GH, TV strike zone discipline, I'd be more than willing to see what we've got there, when he's ready, of course, or next Tuesday, whichever comes first.

I've been a big Mountcastle fan since he came up, but we're no longer tankers, we're contenders. Having due notice thereof, you may govern yourself accordingly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Ridgway22
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

Yeah, I think he still is who he's always been. Which is a .300-.320 OBP, .750-.775 OPS player. Which ultimately is totally replaceable given the prospects the organization has.

At the trade deadline, I'd be trading away Urias, Santander, Mountcastle, and Mateo in that order (and Frazier in a salary dump). The Orioles need to properly allocate resources and open up playing time for the multiple top shelf prospects the organization has close to the majors.

Exactly this. Mountcastle is utterly replaceable. And the others, including Mateo, are blocking guys who need to be on the ML team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...