Jump to content

2023 Ongoing Lineup Thread


Ripken

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

There’s a part of managing that involves keeping all the players involved and content.   I think that’s why McCann gets the occasional DH game.  He’s a veteran and they want to keep him a bit more involved than just being the backup C.  In a vacuum, that may not be the best choice on a given day, but in the long run it may help the team.   Anyway, I think that’s the rationale here.  

You may be right,  but if that's the logic I find it faulty.  Not sure it's worth giving away a handful of at bats a game just to keep the backup catcher content. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

You may be right,  but if that's the logic I find it faulty.  Not sure it's worth giving away a handful of at bats a game just to keep the backup catcher content. 

If McCann wants to be content Hyde can remind him he's getting paid $24.2 million (Mets on the hook for $19M) the next two seasons guaranteed if he manages to not get suspended or retire.

With the options the Orioles have for DH if McCann can only hang it filling in once a week as the starting catcher then that's his role.

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Hopefully it's more like a handful of at bats a week.

Sure, but on a game by game basis, for that game it's a handful of at bats.  Whether that happens once a week or more frequently doesn't change that fact that for that game we are not putting the best team on the field to protect the psyche of the backup catcher, if that's really the logic.  If so that's a sad waste, and could cost us games in close games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tommorow's lineup is against a LHP. I'm assuming both Urias and Mateo play. Let’s play a game where of you had to choose between 2 players to put in the lineup against the LHP, you are you picking?

McCann or Mckenna?

Vavra or McKenna?

Adam Frazier or Gunnar Henderson?

Ramon Urias or Adam Frazier? 

 

Ok I'm out of ways to phrase that, but I'm thinking about who might play 3B, SS, 2B, RF, C, and DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Tommorow's lineup is against a LHP. I'm assuming both Urias and Mateo play. Let’s play a game where of you had to choose between 2 players to put in the lineup against the LHP, you are you picking?

McCann or Mckenna?

Vavra or McKenna?

Adam Frazier or Gunnar Henderson?

Ramon Urias or Adam Frazier? 

 

Ok I'm out of ways to phrase that, but I'm thinking about who might play 3B, SS, 2B, RF, C, and DH.

Adley caught today so I would guess McCann C, Adley DH. Santander in RF. Mateo SS, Urias either 2B or 3B, then choose between Frazer and Gunnar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Adley caught today so I would guess McCann C, Adley DH. Santander in RF. Mateo SS, Urias either 2B or 3B, then choose between Frazer and Gunnar. 

And it will be Frazier.  He was off today, and Gunnar got some experience against LHPs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Adley caught today so I would guess McCann C, Adley DH. Santander in RF. Mateo SS, Urias either 2B or 3B, then choose between Frazer and Gunnar. 

If that's the case, then tomorrow's lineup would probably be exactly the same as it was today except with Frazier substituted in for Gunnar at the 7 spot. And defensively, Adley would be DH with McCann catching, Urias at 3B and Fraizier at 2B.

It's also a day game so I'm inclined to believe that your guess is and educated one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

If that's the case, then tomorrow's lineup would probably be exactly the same as it was today except with Frazier substituted in for Gunnar at the 7 spot. And defensively, Adley would be DH with McCann catching, Urias at 3B and Fraizier at 2B.

It's also a day game so I'm inclined to believe that your guess is and educated one.

We were close. Adley on the bench, Santander to DH. Otherwise it's the RH stack plus Frazier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Crazy idea: Trade for Salvador Perez, he and Adley split catching and DH, teach one or both of them to play 1B

Why do people continue to want to take Adley out from behind the plate? That’s where his value is!

He’s not some 30+ homer/900+ OPS hitter. We need to stop treating him as if he’s done high level offensive player at first or DH. He has to catch.

You took him first because of the value he has as a catcher, not a DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Crazy idea: Trade for Salvador Perez, he and Adley split catching and DH, teach one or both of them to play 1B

I would be in on Sal Perez if he were on the trade market, but he has an opportunity at that one franchise kind of thing, and is wearing the Captain C on his uniform.

This kind of Buy Side acquistion, same as McCann, it goes without saying Elias would negotiate the payout of the contract remainder down.    I don't think Sal has let go of his self-image as an everyday catcher, so that probably makes the whole concept a non-starter.     But a RH bat like him in the middle of the lineup is a good fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Why do people continue to want to take Adley out from behind the plate? That’s where his value is!

He’s not some 30+ homer/900+ OPS hitter. We need to stop treating him as if he’s done high level offensive player at first or DH. He has to catch.

You took him first because of the value he has as a catcher, not a DH.

Game on the line, who on our team would you rather have at the plate ahead of Adley? Only other guy I'd maybe want is Mountcastle if there are 2 out and we absolutely need a homer. Hays, Mullins, and Santander all have lower career OPS than Adley. He is certainly one of our top 3 hitters. Yes, he needs to catch as much as possible but he is absolutely a Great Hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...