Jump to content

Austin Hays 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Hallas said:

So far its looking like I was pretty wrong about Hays.  I kind of wanted us to use him as trade bait.

 

He could still regress, and he's been prone to hellacious slumps in the past, but right now he's surpassing my expectations. 

A lot of good players have a year where they break out. It’s not unusual. 

I would guess that this will be his if he stays healthy. 

And they still should use him as trade bait. He may even be dealt next month. I’m starting to expect one of him or Santander to be dealt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

I know it's hard to believe, but people vote for guys like Santander because they're a well-liked player on their favorite team.  Not everyone votes for All-Stars based on actual merit.

I’m aware..thus why I asked if he actually believes he deserves to be an AS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

A lot of good players have a year where they break out. It’s not unusual. 

I would guess that this will be his if he stays healthy. 

And they still should use him as trade bait. He may even be dealt next month. I’m starting to expect one of him or Santander to be dealt. 

Absolutely not going to happen.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Absolutely not going to happen.

We’ll see. If more sellers come on the market, I agree with you.

If it ends up being buyer to buyer trades, I don’t agree.

Santander is a replaceable piece. He has a 785 OPs and a WAR below 1 but the bat Carries upside from each side of the plate. 
 

Hays is a solid player in the midst of what could be his career year. But his durability and reliability have always been issues and they could attempt to capitalize on his value that will likely never be higher, ala Lopez last year.

The difference is, of course, that the team is winning(well winning more) but if you are getting a help you win now piece and you have those OFers in the minors you like and trust, it makes sense to move on.

As always, it will depend on what teams want and what is available but I think the chances are increasing that one of them is moved.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We’ll see. If more sellers come on the market, I agree with you.

If it ends up being buyer to buyer trades, I don’t agree.

Santander is a replaceable piece. He has a 785 OPs and a WAR below 1 but the bat Carries upside from each side of the plate. 
 

Hays is a solid player in the midst of what could be his career year. But his durability and reliability have always been issues and they could attempt to capitalize on his value that will likely never be higher, ala Lopez last year.

The difference is, of course, that the team is winning but if you are getting a help you win now piece and you have those OFers in the minors you like and trust, it makes sense to move on.

As always, it will depend on what teams want and what is available but I think the chances are increasing that one of them is moved.

Not happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Not happening.

I kind of agree with this.  Unless something happens with one of their starters, I don't see them trading anyone from the 25-man roster.   I would be more inclined to strike while the iron is hot with Santander or Hays, but I think that time will happen in the offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

I kind of agree with this.  Unless something happens with one of their starters, I don't see them trading anyone from the 25-man roster.   I would be more inclined to strike while the iron is hot with Santander or Hays, but I think that time will happen in the offseason. 

There's no way in hell they're trading either Hays or Santander this deadline in the middle of a pennant race.  Absolutely, not happening.

This offseason is a different story.  I think one of them might get moved then.  But, of course, that's a completely different consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, clapdiddy said:

I kind of agree with this.  Unless something happens with one of their starters, I don't see them trading anyone from the 25-man roster.   I would be more inclined to strike while the iron is hot with Santander or Hays, but I think that time will happen in the offseason. 

The issue is going to come down to what teams are trading.

Speculation from many people in and around the game is that we could see buyer to buyer trades, which we don’t usually see, because so many teams are in it right now.

How much does that change in the next month?  If it changes a lot, I tend to think this isn’t as likely. If it doesn’t change, it becomes more likely.

The Indians, as an example, have pitching they can deal from and need hitting. Now, if they are out of it, they may want prospects instead but if they are in it and want to go for it and get back someone(s) with lower salaries, Hays makes some sense for them.

It’s very fluid. Elias has certainly shown that he doesn’t want to lose the vets, so I get the thought process of believing it’s not happening. Otoh, we aren’t talking about losing core, difference making pieces either, so he may be more willing to sure up one area and go with the kids in the other.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Pickles said:

There's no way in hell they're trading either Hays or Santander this deadline in the middle of a pennant race.  Absolutely, not happening.

This offseason is a different story.  I think one of them might get moved then.  But, of course, that's a completely different consideration.

I agree with this. It seems pretty clear that Elias intends to ride this current position player group for as long as things continue to go well. I don't see him unplugging any major components of the lineup mid-season unless things really fall apart over the next month. Even then, I would expect the focus to be more on weak links like Mounty or Mateo. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2023 at 11:08 AM, emmett16 said:

That would be fantastic.  Hays RF, Mullins CF, Cowser LF would be an upgraded defensive set up and way more offense pushing Santander to to DH & Vavra to Norfolk. Cowser is starting to look like a man amongst boys at AAA and think he can have a very positive impact in short time.  

 

Yes the Cowser - LF, Mullins -CF, Hays - RF is the best defensive outfield the Orioles can put out there with starting caliber offensive players. Hicks seems to be able to fill in CF and RF, and probably LF and of course Santander can go back out to RF if needed. 

The bench would become much stronger as well, especially if Westburg were added as well to play 2B. 

My perfect alignment would be:

C - Rustchman
1B - O'Hearn-Mountcastle platoon
2B - Westburg
SS - Ortiz
3B -Henderson
LF - Cowser
CF - Mullins
RF: Hays
DH Santander

Bench:
Hicks
Frazier
Mateo
Backup catcher of your choice/McCann if he gets healthy 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yes the Cowser - LF, Mullins -CF, Hays - RF is the best defensive outfield the Orioles can put out there with starting caliber offensive players. Hicks seems to be able to fill in CF and RF, and probably LF and of course Santander can go back out to RF if needed. 

The bench would become much stronger as well, especially if Westburg were added as well to play 2B. 

My perfect alignment would be:

C - Rustchman
1B - O'Hearn-Mountcastle platoon
2B - Westburg
SS - Ortiz
3B -Henderson
LF - Cowser
CF - Mullins
RF: Hays
DH Santander

Bench:
Hicks
Frazier
Mateo
Backup catcher of your choice/McCann if he gets healthy 

Are you thinking you would prefer Frazier on the roster over Urias? Or do you think Urias is a better trade candidate due to Fraziers Contract? I don't disagree with your take here I think I agree except I think I would prefer Urias over Frazier on the bench. But that leaves us short a LH bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

A lot of good players have a year where they break out. It’s not unusual. 

I would guess that this will be his if he stays healthy. 

And they still should use him as trade bait. He may even be dealt next month. I’m starting to expect one of him or Santander to be dealt. 

If Santander can play 1B or DH then my preference is to keep him.  I'd rather sell low on Mountcastle and package him with a prospect for a useful pitcher.

 

I will blow a gasket if we do a mid-season trade of Hays in the middle of a playoff run.

Edited by Hallas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...