Jump to content

Has Gunnar's struggles slowed the promotion of other O's prospects?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Hyde said he has been dealing with it for a few days. Day to day at the moment but we will see how long they are ok with playing a man short.

They aren’t really a man short, due to the Lester call-up.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another take on Gunnar.    He is not struggling he just can't hit lefties.

When I look at  Gunnar OPS on the season of 712 I say he is struggling.  But if I look at his splits:

Vs righties    223/333/463/796

Vs lefties     132/313/132/444

Its really appears the its more that Gunnar can't hit lefties than anything else.  Yes his average is low versus righties but because he walks his OBP is good and so is his slugging.  

The O's are trying to develop Gunnar as a full time solution at 3B so maybe they just keep send him out there vs lefties.  But maybe with Frazier  not hitting lefties and we don't know about Hicks yet there are times that the O's need to have a guy that can hit left at 3B.

I would think that is right-handed hitting Urias.   But, in fact,  Urias hit righties better that lefties.  735 OPS vs righties; 622 OPS vs lefties in 2023.  And the same was true for 2022.  742 OPS vs righties ;  666 vs lefties.

Lefty Lester didn't even hit lefties well at AAA with a 682 OPS.  I might think Westburg but he only has a 742 OPS vs lefties at AAA and that will probably decrease in the majors.  Ortiz might be the better answer with a 1284 OPS in 2022 and a 972 OPS in 2023 vs lefties  at AAA in a combined 60 at bats.

Anyway if the approach is that Gunnar is not really struggling vs righties which are 70-75% of the pitchers than adding more rookies to the team may be acceptable.  Like Cowser.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Here is another take on Gunnar.    He is not struggling he just can't hit lefties.

When I look at  Gunnar OPS on the season of 712 I say he is struggling.  But if I look at his splits:

Vs righties    223/333/463/796

Vs lefties     132/313/132/444

Its really appears the its more that Gunnar can't hit lefties than anything else.  Yes his average is low versus righties but because he walks his OBP is good and so is his slugging.  

The O's are trying to develop Gunnar as a full time solution at 3B so maybe they just keep send him out there vs lefties.  But maybe with Frazier  not hitting lefties and we don't know about Hicks yet there are times that the O's need to have a guy that can hit left at 3B.

I would think that is right-handed hitting Urias.   But, in fact,  Urias hit righties better that lefties.  735 OPS vs righties; 622 OPS vs lefties in 2023.  And the same was true for 2022.  742 OPS vs righties ;  666 vs lefties.

Lefty Lester didn't even hit lefties well at AAA with a 682 OPS.  I might think Westburg but he only has a 742 OPS vs lefties at AAA and that will probably decrease in the majors.  Ortiz might be the better answer with a 1284 OPS in 2022 and a 972 OPS in 2023 vs lefties  at AAA in a combined 60 at bats.

Anyway if the approach is that Gunnar is not really struggling vs righties which are 70-75% of the pitchers than adding more rookies to the team may be acceptable.  Like Cowser.

Or the O's need to add a bat the crushes lefties.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respectfully wildcard, the fact that Gunnar is an asset against RHP and a major liability against LHP isn't exactly a new observation.  It's been discussed frequently here (within this very thread in fact).

Ultimately none of our IF players should be inked into the lineup everyday.  Mountcastle has been atrocious against RHP.  Frazier has some good ABs but the ceiling is limited. Mateo's offensive struggles are well-documented.  Gunnar can't hit LHP.  And I like Urias as a whole but he wasn't hitting much before the injury and is hitting even less now. 

There are plenty of ABs to be had for a young infielder (or 2) that can hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

I think Gunnar's in a spot where we can take on more rookie risk (if that's what was holding up any other guys).  

I agree, there appears to be room now that Gunnar has settled in for the next guy to come up and take time to adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...