Jump to content

Specific Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

Eduardo Rodriguez is a guy with a career ERA of over 4+ and a FIP about the same, coming off of injury where he's been up and down in performance since he came back from injury. Stay away. Buyer beware.

There's also the fact that the Orioles traded him away before. No way I see them trading to get him back, especially with the amount of money he's already making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Eduardo Rodriguez is a guy with a career ERA of over 4+ and a FIP about the same, coming off of injury where he's been up and down in performance since he came back from injury. Stay away. Buyer beware.

There's also the fact that the Orioles traded him away before. No way I see them trading to get him back, especially with the amount of money he's already making.

Trying to be a bit deceptive? 

He's got a career ERA of 4.04 an ERA+ of 111 and a FIP of 3.84.

I think the fact that he was traded away nearly a decade ago by a different front office is a non-factor.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eduardo Rodriguez’s 2.70 ERA this year is below his peripherals and the recent injury is something to consider, but he’s got a 3.27 FIP and 3.48 xERA this year and mid-3s FIP and xERA in each of 2018, 2019 and 2021. He didn’t pitch in 2020 and last year did not do well, but had apparently had personal issues going on that took him away from the team last year for an extended period. The way he’s performed this year gives some assurance those are behind him. He’s not an “ace” or TOR but if he’s healthy he’s a very solid SP that is well above average. The recent injury and his 2022 season should be priced into his trade value as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cease is someone that most O's fans would be excited to deal for.  Naturally, the return would have to be enticing enough for the White Sox, and it's quite unlikely it would work out.  However, if we were to speculate on what that deal would look like, I'd venture it'd be something like:

  • SP Cease [FA 2026] and RP Keynan Middleton [FA 2024] to the O's
  • OF Cowser, SS/2B Ortiz, CA Willems, and SP McDermott.

Again, not expecting Cease to be dealt OR Elias trading Cowser.  This is just what I think it might take.

What would you adjust, or just your thoughts in general?

Edited by Greg Pappas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

Cease is someone that most O's fans would be excited to deal for.  Naturally, the return would have to be enticing enough for the White Sox, and it's quite unlikely it would work out.  However, if we were to speculate on what that deal would look like, I'd venture it'd be something like:

  • SP Cease and RP Keynan Middleton to the O's
  • OF Cowser, SS/2B Ortiz, and CA Willems, and SP McDermott.

Again, not expecting Cease to be dealt OR Elias trading Cowser.  This is just what I think it might take.

What would you adjust, or just your thoughts in general?

I'd consider this deal.   You get Cease through 2025.  Middleton is a free agent after this year, I believe. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Camden Yards said:

Instead of EROD what would it take for Tarik Skubal coming back from an injury. 

Why would the Tigers trade a 26 year old LHP who's under contract for three more seasons? When teams sell, they sell their older short term pieces not their building blocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

Cease is someone that most O's fans would be excited to deal for.  Naturally, the return would have to be enticing enough for the White Sox, and it's quite unlikely it would work out.  However, if we were to speculate on what that deal would look like, I'd venture it'd be something like:

  • SP Cease [FA 2026] and RP Keynan Middleton [FA 2024] to the O's
  • OF Cowser, SS/2B Ortiz, CA Willems, and SP McDermott.

Again, not expecting Cease to be dealt OR Elias trading Cowser.  This is just what I think it might take.

What would you adjust, or just your thoughts in general?

I just don't understand why the Sox would trade Cease. Not when they have older more obvious trade pieces like Lynn, Giolito and T. Anderson to trade away to restock their farm system. As desperate as teams are for starting pitching this season I think we're going to be amazed what they get for Lynn and Giolito. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I just don't understand why the Sox would trade Cease. Not when they have older more obvious trade pieces like Lynn, Giolito and T. Anderson to trade away to restock their farm system. As desperate as teams are for starting pitching this season I think we're going to be amazed what they get for Lynn and Giolito. 

I agree with you that it's unlikely and said it was unlikely in the post.  I was posting in response to the rumor about the Astros interest in trading for Cease. I wouldn't deal him if I were them, but I also wouldn't offer more than what I posted on our side.  Unlikely, even highly unlikely, isn't impossible though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O'Hearn has been a nice story, but I'm calling the Cardinals about Goldschmidt (and their pitching) even though there have been indications the Cards won't deal him. If they really are rebuilding then Goldschmidt isna player the Cardinals shouldn't be married to as he'll be 36 years old in September.

Of course who am I kidding the Angelos brothers won't pick up his contract that runs through 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Difference in trading vets from a team still in rebuild mode versus trading vets from a team with World Series aspirations.  We've not seen him trade vets since the rebuild ended.
    • Understood. But here's the thing (given the current economic structure of the game) there are three ways to handle payroll for a winning team (as I see them). One is the Rays/Brewers/Guardians way. Where you have maybe one long term substantive contract (mostly done while player is young and before he has made real money or achieved real fame) and most of the time the contract is an exploitive type deal with a kid from another country who comes from a context of poverty (not judging it is what it is). These teams continuously are reloading/retooling/ and have constant roster reshaping and turnover. The goal is to make the postseason and hopeful every once in a blue moon the stars align while you are there and you may be able to go all the way! While these teams are often good, they are rarely great. And are even less willing to do what it takes to get them over the top IMO. The proof is in the fact that this model has never led to championship success (unless you want to use the Marlins of over 20 years ago from 03'). Another model is the "big spenders model", who spend seriously and have World Series aspirations. Some spend all on FA (like the Padres/Mets) and are super aggressive with trades hoping to augment their talent as they chase championships, but rarely does this work because the foundation of the team is usually built so poorly. They may be good for a season or shorter term but struggle to sustain. Then there are teams like the Phillies/Dodgers who do a combo of developing and spending (let's call that the best of both worlds). Obviously this is the most preferable because you get the short and long term rewards. But it may not be realistic to think that the O's could ever do/have what it takes to fully do both. Then there is the Braves and Astros model. Still a higher payroll but minimizing of risks through extending younger players (Braves) or avoiding most long term contracts (Astros) but paying higher salaries on shorter deals. Obviously both franchises have been successful (won WS). Having said all this the reality exists that if/when you do longer term contracts (extensions or FA deals) for franchise/cornerstone/superstar type players, you most likely won't get the best value on the back end (think Paul Goldschmidt this year). That's just the economics of the game. But the thing is, the owners (especially our new group) have the money and then some to write off those things and keep rolling as "the cost of doing business".  When examining all winners of the World Series in the last decade a pattern is pretty apparent (with exception of the Astros first championship in 17') you have to spend in order to win. 
    • An alternative... also from the Rangers:  Nathan Eovaldi.  FA after this season but has a $20m vesting option for 2025 if he throws 300 innings combined between '23 & '24.  It'll be close.  Between Scherzer (40 this month) and Eovaldi (34) who would you prefer? 
    • That's a fair assessment.  I wouldn't be willing to give up a whole lot for him but I'd at least inquire rather than just dismissing the possibility out of hand based on what he did last year (which is not what you were doing). 
    • Really interesting article on Brecht by Mellissa Lockhart in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5606772/2024/07/03/brody-brecht-mlb-draft-iowa-football-baseball/ Sounds like a kid who is super coachable.  "Brecht has big-league stuff, but questions remain about whether he can command his arsenal well enough to be effective against major-league hitters, especially in a starter’s role. Law noted in his mock draft that Brecht is “a college pitcher who’s less polished than his peers, with athleticism and arm strength that point to more upside.” Heller says major-league organizations only have to look at the improvements Brecht made from his sophomore to junior season to see how much room there is for him to continue to grow as a pitcher. “It shows you the aptitude that Brody has and the ability to make adjustments and change,” Heller said. “Not everybody has that. It’s not easy to do and Brody did it in a very short time.”  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...