Jump to content

The fastest Orioles teams to reach 20 games over .500


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I think that select list of top 7 fastest teams reflects really well the comparative quality of the those teams. I would rank them roughly in that order (especially after playing lots of Sims to find the same basic rank order). So #8 there is pretty select company, all right. I would even venture to say, that whole list presents a fair ranking of relative quality of all those teams. Here they are in rank order, by your fastest games to +20:

1969 48
1997 50
1966 62
1979 64
1970 66
1971 66
1964 72
2023 90
1968 116
1980 116
1977 118
1960 124
1973 124
1983 124
2014 124
1961 130
1982 136
1965 138
2012 148
1975 152
1978 158
1974 162
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

The O's reached a useful milestone last night, 20 games over .500.   If they played .500 ball the rest of the way, they'd finish 91-71 and that would probably (not definitely) put them in the playoffs.   That got me to wondering, which Orioles teams reached 20 games  over .500 the fastest, and how did their seasons go after that?   Did any of them fail to play .500 ball after reaching 20 games over?

The 2023 Orioles are, by my count, the 22nd Orioles team to reach 20+ games over .500, and the the 8th-fastest to get there.   The 7 teams ahead of them were (in order of earliest to reach 20 games over): 1969 (48 games), 1997 (50), 1966 (62), 1979 (64), 1970 (66), 1971 (66), and 1964 (72).   Six of those 7 teams went on to win the most games of any team in the American League, the only exception being the 1964 O's, who won 97 games but finished 2 games behind the Yankees and 1 behind the White Sox.  So, the 2023 O's are in pretty select company, though slower to get to 20 above than any of these.   All of the other 14 teams got to 20 games over much later than this year's O's.  Here’s a list of all O’s teams that have reached 20+ games over .500, in chronological order:

YEAR   #Games  Subs. Record  Final Record

1960   124          17-13                89-65

1961   130          20-12                95-67

1964    72          51-39                 97-65

1965   138         15-9                   94-68

1966    62          56-42                97-63

1968   116          23-23                91-71

1969    48          75-39               109-53

1970    66           66-30               108-54

1971    66           58-34                101-57

1973  124           25-13                  97-65

1974  162            0-0                     91-71

1975  152            4-3                     90-69

1977  118          28-15                    97-65

1978  158           1-2                       90-71

1979   64           60-35                102-57

1980  116          32-14                 100-62

1982  136          16-10                   94-68

1983  124          26-12                   98-64

1997   50            63-49                  98-64

2012  148            9-5                     93-69

2014  124            24-14                 96-66

2023   90             ??-??                  ??-??

As you can see, fate has been kind to the Orioles teams that managed to reach 20 games over .500.   All but one of the 21 of the previous teams to reach that mark during the season were able to finish at least 20 games over, the lone exception being the 1978 O’s, who only reached 20 games over in game 158 and went 1-2 the rest of the way.   The other team you could say was somewhat disappointing was the 1968 team, that hit 20 games over in Game 116 but only was able to go 23-23 the rest of the way.  Even so, that ’68 team was far behind the high-flying Tigers and they would have had to go something like 34-12 down the stretch to catch them.   Otherwise, all these teams acquitted themselves pretty well after hitting the 20 games over mark.   We can only hope that the 2023 team follows suit.

Cool research/list.

For teams that first reach +20 any time in the first 130 games, I think it has probably been uncommon if not quite rare for such teams to finish below +20.  The reason (in part at least) is September effect where good teams play better and bad teams play worse due to the impact of the trade deadline and playing for the postseason rather than to audition talent in the many years prior to service-time manipulation and smaller Sept rosters.

Being in the AL East, the Orioles have had a chance to play against some of the all-time choking Red Sox teams.  Even that historic 2011 team reached +20 after 90 games (55-35) and was only -2 the rest of the way to fall out of the playoffs. 

I was sure the 1974 Red Sox would have been +20 at some point, but they topped out at +16 (70-54 on 8/23) before they went -10 the rest of the way.  The 63-65 Orioles ran them down with a 28-6 stretch drive to leave them in 3rd place, 8 back.

The 1978 Red Sox who were subjected to the great Yankees comeback reached +20 in game 52 (36-16) and still were 63-48 the rest of the way.

A broader set of playoff teams could possibly create a competitive environment where wins are harder to come by in September, but that September effect first postulated by Bill James is still happening and the current +20s don't seem to be in any danger of playing enough under .500 the rest of the way to finish below +20.  The Orioles are the team which makes me a little nervous for that claim, given they are only +21 now.

Edited by Filmstudy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Now here is a fun thread bump.  The 2024 team just tied the 1979 team as the 4th fastest Orioles team to reach 20 games over .500.  Very impressive company!

All that with a terrible bullpen, rotation with guys hurt and not going deep in games, an offense that can’t hit junk pitchers, struggles late in games after they get few runs in early innings, can’t hit a sac fly to save their life, a manager that favors the vets and lets young guys waste on the bench, a manager that takes out way to early and misuses the bullpen, a GM that cares more about prospect rankings then actually winning games this year, and an owner that won’t spend any money and is cheap(oh wait we can’t use that one anymore). I can’t wait til we start fixing those things we will win 120 games if we do.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be the most talented Orioles team in my lifetime of watching. I’m not old enough to recall the 79-80 teams. 
 

1983 is the best team because of obvious reasons, that said this team is deeper. 

My top 10 -Using 82 as starting point- I do recall 81 season some also 

1)1983

2)2024- subject to change …

3)1997

4)2014/2023 tie for me  23 better overall season but 14 won a playoff series  

6)1982

7)1996

8)2012

9)2016

10)1989

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

All that with a terrible bullpen, rotation with guys hurt and not going deep in games, an offense that can’t hit junk pitchers, struggles late in games after they get few runs in early innings, can’t hit a sac fly to save their life, a manager that favors the vets and lets young guys waste on the bench, a manager that takes out way to early and misuses the bullpen, a GM that cares more about prospect rankings then actually winning games this year, and an owner that won’t spend any money and is cheap(oh wait we can’t use that one anymore). I can’t wait til we start fixing those things we will win 120 games if we do.  

Of all the grievances here, I think the GM caring about prospect rankings more than anything is my favorite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...