Jump to content

Trade chips replaced in-house = Salary Relief


emmett16

Recommended Posts

Could we get anything for O'Hearn? That would open up 300 AB's for Kjerstad. O'Hearn has one year left and will be coming off a year hitting .300/.336/.840. 130 OPS+. Someone has to be interested in that kind of production. O'Hearn will be Arb3 making about $2M, free agent in 2025. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Kremer will be in the rotation but personally, I would trade him.

Wells would go to the pen.

Trading Kremer would be a huge mistake.  He is 27.  He is cheap. He will not be arbitration eligible until after the 2024 season.   He has allowed 3 or few runs in 18 of his last 20 start.    In those 20 starts he as a 3.70 ERA.   He had a bad April but  still had a 2-1 record for the month.  He has turned his season around and has been a important part of the O's rotation going 12-5.  When he starts tonight he will tie Gibson for the most starts on the team with 27 on the season.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Could we get anything for O'Hearn? That would open up 300 AB's for Kjerstad. O'Hearn has one year left and will be coming off a year hitting .300/.336/.840. 130 OPS+. Someone has to be interested in that kind of production. O'Hearn will be Arb3 making about $2M, free agent in 2025. 

I guess it would depend on finding someone who trusts that his season translates to future success. I don't have that level of trust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Trading Kremer would be a huge mistake.  He is 27.  He is cheap. He will not be arbitration eligible until after the 2024 season.   He has allowed 3 or few runs in 18 of his last 20 start.    In those 20 starts he as a 3.70 ERA.   He had a bad April but  still had a 2-1 record for the month.  He has turned his season around and has been a important part of the O's rotation going 12-5.  When he starts tonight he will tie Gibson for the most starts on the team with 27 on the season.

In a vacuum, I agree with you.  But it depends who else they acquire for the rotation and what they would get for Kremer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Trading Kremer would be a huge mistake.  He is 27.  He is cheap. He will not be arbitration eligible until after the 2024 season.   He has allowed 3 or few runs in 18 of his last 20 start.    In those 20 starts he as a 3.70 ERA.   He had a bad April but  still had a 2-1 record for the month.  He has turned his season around and has been a important part of the O's rotation going 12-5.  When he starts tonight he will tie Gibson for the most starts on the team with 27 on the season.

I would not be shocked to see one of Kremer, Wells, or Irvin traded. I expect ME to sign one of his veteran starters like the Gibson's of the world. I don't agree with it but I would not be shocked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Frobby said:

In a vacuum, I agree with you.  But it depends who else they acquire for the rotation and what they would get for Kremer.  

Pretty hard to trade for someone better than Kremer when he is pitching like he is for the minimum salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I would not be shocked to see one of Kremer, Wells, or Irvin traded. I expect ME to sign one of his veteran starters like the Gibson's of the world. I don't agree with it but I would not be shocked. 

I will be surprised if any of the three are traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kremer has some bad statcast data.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/dean-kremer-665152?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

He doesn’t Miss bats, gives up a lot of homers, has an FIP at 4.74 and an xERA well over 5.

Now, that said, he’s a valuable and serviceable guy. He is eating innings and keeping us in games basically every time he takes the mound. He is also cheap for another 2-3 seasons, so that’s obviously great.

The problem is, he could easily be a 5+ ERA guy at any moment. The peripheral stats and batted ball data just arent that good although it is good that he is raising the K rate some recently.

If the team was going to truly invest in pitching and trade for a guy and sign a real starter, I would want to replace him. You can do better (you can also do worse) and the team has the resources to easily to do it.

That said, he’s going to be in the rotation next year because he’s earned the chance to keep the spot and the Os aren’t going to give up the cheap arm that can eat innings and they will have the guys coming up that can be behind him if he struggles and they will  have the resources to go get someone at the deadline to replace him if all else fails and they are in the race.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Trading Kremer would be a huge mistake.  He is 27.  He is cheap. He will not be arbitration eligible until after the 2024 season.   He has allowed 3 or few runs in 18 of his last 20 start.    In those 20 starts he as a 3.70 ERA.   He had a bad April but  still had a 2-1 record for the month.  He has turned his season around and has been a important part of the O's rotation going 12-5.  When he starts tonight he will tie Gibson for the most starts on the team with 27 on the season.

It's also not like this is a fluke. He had a 3.23 ERA/2.9 WAR in a break out '22, and is following that up with a 4.31 ERA, improved K/9, and career high in innings. (I wonder how his numbers would look if he had stayed home from WBC and done his usual spring training?) Anyway, you don't trade a guy like that. Someone would have to make a huge overpay and those deals don't happen in real life. I'd like to see him keep pitching for us and building his value. If he has a bad year, bring in a rental.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, now said:

What a strange statement, given Wells's all-star-worthy first half and Irvin's second-half rebound. 

Irvin hasn’t been good this year overall though. I mean, I like him and I think he’s a good piece to have around but he has an ErA approaching 5 and had to spend a lot of the season in the minors.

And what do you give up for a guy with mediocre peripherals and statcast numbers and who gives up a ton of homers and has to be babied for half the season? 
 

It’s not that Wells isn’t a good pitcher. You love his control but his stuff isn’t overwhelming and he’s softer than charmin once he reaches 80-110 innings. His role is hard to pin down because you don’t know that you would value him as a high leverage reliever because of the homer issue and if he’s only a middle reliever/swingman type guy, why would you give up anything of value for that? Every organization has those guys and there are always guys like that on the waiver wire available for free. 
 
In fact, you can say that about both of these guys. 

 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Irvin hasn’t been good this year overall though. I mean, I like him and I think he’s a good piece to have around but he has an ErA approaching 5 and had to spend a lot of the season in the minors.

And what do you give up for a guy with mediocre peripherals and statcast numbers and who gives up a ton of homers and has to be babied for half the season? 
 

It’s not that Wells isn’t a good pitcher. You love his control but his stuff isn’t overwhelming and he’s softer than charmin once he reaches 80-110 innings. His role is hard to pin down because you don’t know that you would value him as a high leverage reliever because of the homer issue and if he’s only a middle reliever/swingman type guy, why would you give up anything of value for that? Every organization has those guys and there are always guys like that on the waiver wire available for free. 
 
In fact, you can say that about both of these guys. 

 

Sure, they both have limitations... but also value. After all, the O's gave up a decent prospect (Hernaiz) to get Irvin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, now said:

Sure, they both have limitations... but also value. After all, the O's gave up a decent prospect (Hernaiz) to get Irvin. 

And he has been worse with us..in a pitcher friendly park. When the Os acquired him, he had pitched about 360 innings of 4.1 ERA ball over 2 years. Big difference between that and what he has done this year.

I see zero reason why any team would trade for either. It just doesn’t make sense.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

In a vacuum, I agree with you.  But it depends who else they acquire for the rotation and what they would get for Kremer.  

To me (and I'll be the first person to say I'm not good at the trade proposal thing) Kremer seems like a guy you could package with a couple other pieces to get a better starter.  He eats innings and can fill the void left by the impact starter.  He has a tiny bit of upside, under team control for a while, and is affordable.  Santander (or Hays) + Kremer + Norby could be enticing for a team with surplus pitching looking for offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Like I said the other day, it would be nice to hear from some scouts, the org or whoever about all the walks, lack of power, lack of BA, etc…is he tweaking things? Is the elbow bothering him to where he can’t drive the ball? Is he getting nothing to hit?     I’m surprised someone from the Banner hasn’t gotten into this because it’s obviously a big story and one that should be reported on.  
    • One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”. From this Baltimore Banner article:  “Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.” His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon. First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)   PAs    K%           wOBA  xwOBA whiff % 4/27-5/18 91 19.8% .366 .349 21.6% 5/19-7/2 118 28.8% .392 .337 32.1%     PAs    EV      hard hit % barrel/PA 4/27-5/18 91 89.5 44.4% 4.4% 5/19-7/2 118 89.8 44.6% 4.2%
    • Sure. And his ligaments would have likely snapped, and he'd have put that college degree to good use instead of being a ballplayer. Or he would have thrown at 90% like most everyone else and topped out with Cedar Rapids in the Three-I League.
    • Let's say you allow the sticky stuff. The guys whose sweeper breaks 10" might now see it break 12". You think they're going to grip the ball more loosely, throw with a little less effort, get hurt less, and be content with a 10" sweeper?  No! They're going to grip the hell out of the ball and use the sticky stuff and try to get a 15" sweeper. And they'll keep getting hurt just as much. It couldn't be more clear that almost every pitcher and every coach and every team chooses the high-risk, high-reward path. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.
    • I guarantee you that if Christy could only get guys out by using his best stuff he would have.  
    • I'm going to guess that in the olden days there was a weeding out that happened before most kids played an organized baseball game. Many, many kids played baseball all day long in the summer, and many, many of them tore up their elbow or shoulder at 11 or 13 or whatever and never pitched on a high school or other team. And nobody was Drivelining anyone. Part of the philosophy of pitching was you don't throw as hard as you possibly can because it hurts and you'll ruin your arm. A few people got away with throwing near max effort, but most couldn't. And there was a very stong stigma to coming out of a game, so pitchers knew they'd be shamed and mocked if they threw until it really hurt and had to come out. In the 1910's Christy Mathewson (or a ghostwriter) wrote Pitching in a Pinch, where he explicitly said that using your best stuff except when you really needed to was stupid.  Smoltz is a guy who idiotically venerates the past, making the era where he came up into some kind of golden nirvana. But, he is right that the driving factor in injuries today is that everyone throws at 110% of rated capacity all the time. It's just a matter of time until something tears.  The problem is that there is no simple solution, since throwing at 110% is simply more effective than throwing at 90%. 90% gets you (essentially) limitless innings. But 110% makes your ERA half a run or a run lower (numbers made up for illustration). And it couldn't be more clear that when $millions and wins are on the line, essentially everyone picks the lower ERA over the more innings. An average MLB pitcher has an ERA in the mid-4s. If he backs it off to 90% so he can pitch into the 8th or 9th, he'll likely have an ERA in the mid-5s, which puts him in AAA. The difference between pacing and pitching until it breaks is often the difference between $7M a year and $70k a year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...