Jump to content

Feeling Nostalgic about the 70's


Sanity Check

Recommended Posts

This is not quite 1970’s nostalgia, but 1969 welcomed the publication of the 1st edition of the Baseball Encyclopedia.   I got a copy as a present and it’s certainly the best present I’d ever gotten to that point in my 11-year old life.  The full career season-by-season stats of every player who had ever played the game!   A couple of pages on the stats for every season ever played, team-by-team, with the final standings for each season!  Lists of the top career hitters and pitchers in all major categories!

I don’t think younger fans can really appreciate how big a development this was.   The information in that book was not available in readily usable form anywhere else on earth.  My brother and I took turns studying every page of that book, learning about past great players and sometimes just very good players who had one amazing season.  We used to have drafts where we’d alternate picks, add up the stats of the players we selected, and see who won.  Sometimes we’d do the draft based on the player’s best season, or it might be best three seasons, or best five seasons, or best three consecutive seasons, or whatever.  Sometimes we’d do it by decade.  The variations were almost limitless.  Sometimes we’d do it “open book,” other times from memory, but either way, we’d use the Encyclopedia to tell us who had the better three seasons, Addie Joss or Mordecai “Three Finger” Brown.   It was awesome.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was also an annual publication called Who’s Who in Baseball that would have the career season-by-season stats for every active player.  So, while the Baseball Encyclopedia wasn’t republished in updated form every year, if you bought a Who’s Who  each season you could augment the information in the Encyclopedia with subsequent seasons.  The Who’s Who looked like this.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

I was batboy for the 70-71-Oriole teams...thats pretty awesome to remember...I actually owned ONE of Brooks Robinson's sawed off batting helmets(the bill was cut down so Brooks could see better)...the other helmet is in the HOF...but my nephew actually left the helmet I owned in the rain...and his mother threw it out in 1975....I  still cant forgive her for that...

I don’t get it.  She threw it out because it got wet?  Huh?

As the Robot said in Lost in Space, ‘Thst does not compute’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

Before my teenage years when I started buying all the baseball publications I could get my hands on, I religiously watched This Week In Baseball. I was legitimately disappointed if the family had plans and I missed it.

Like Frobby, I also sat for hours reading the list of qualified hitters and pitchers in the Sunday sports section. “Wow, look at that average on Madlock!” 

Planned my Saturday around This Week In Baseball.  When I got my Apple TV+ trial (to watch the O’s of course) I found they have a library of old episodes.  It was fun watching the one from Opening Week in ‘82 with a feature on rookies Cal Ripken, Jr. and Terry Francona, both of whom with full heads of hair!  😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, btownoriole said:

Planned my Saturday around This Week In Baseball.  When I got my Apple TV+ trial (to watch the O’s of course) I found they have a library of old episodes.  It was fun watching the one from Opening Week in ‘82 with a feature on rookies Cal Ripken, Jr. and Terry Francona, both of whom with full heads of hair!  😂

Apple TV also has a 'great games' library which is both very sparse and very random.  One game they have is the 1991 opening of New Comiskey Park - a game between the White Sox and Orioles.  It is the full game with O's announcers Jon Miller and Jim Palmer.   My son thought it was funny I was getting excited for an O's rally in a game from 32 years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/24/2023 at 12:10 PM, Frobby said:

I can’t speak about the Sun, but in those days the Post would print a full list of all the stats of the qualified batters and pitchers every Sunday, and I’d spend at least an hour looking at them every week.  The batter list was in BA order (OBP? SLG? What’s that?), while the pitcher list was in ERA order.  As a 4th grader, our teacher actually taught us how to divide a larger number into a smaller number by giving us a copy the final 1967 list from the paper and having us calculate the batting averages by dividing the at bats into the hits for every player.  My lifetime fascination with baseball stats stems from that exercise, and to this day I remember a lot of stats from that particular season.  

Alan Greenspan credits baseball stats for his love of math and then economics.  I can still do most math in my head and am baffled by newer generations that need to use the calculator on their phone, it was of great use in my professional life.  I too remember going to the news stand the day The Sporting News came out to read about the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Snutchy said:

There are LOTS of O’s fans still around Rochester. My wife is from there and we visit 3-4 times a year. I always wear my O’s gear and ALWAYS have older folks tell me they’re O’s fans and want to talk baseball. 

Yes... I try to get home as much as possible (not often any longer) but I am seeing a lot of Yankees (ughhhh) there now... Probably a combination of O's ditching and bandwagon maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Il BuonO said:

My dad is from Rochester and that’s how me and my brothers started following the Orioles. The ‘70 series against the Reds is etched in my memory. In those days there World Series was played at day time and pops let me miss school to watch a game. He wrote a note for me to take to the nuns the next day explaining I needed to experience the great American cultural pastime of baseball. Needless to say, they weren’t having any.

My first was the 1969 series and watching on the auditorium stage.  I loved the day games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, btownoriole said:

Planned my Saturday around This Week In Baseball.  When I got my Apple TV+ trial (to watch the O’s of course) I found they have a library of old episodes.  It was fun watching the one from Opening Week in ‘82 with a feature on rookies Cal Ripken, Jr. and Terry Francona, both of whom with full heads of hair!  😂

I also planned my Saturday around watching TWIB.  Just hearing the TWIB theme music brings me back to my childhood and gives me goosebumps.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Frobby said:

There was also an annual publication called Who’s Who in Baseball that would have the career season-by-season stats for every active player.  So, while the Baseball Encyclopedia wasn’t republished in updated form every year, if you bought a Who’s Who  each season you could augment the information in the Encyclopedia with subsequent seasons.  The Who’s Who looked like this.

I used to get these every year.  I also remember the anticipation of when the spring edition of Baseball Digest or Street and Smith's yearbook would hit the stands so that I could see all the predictions and who were the rising starts to watch.

I also remember trying to get the radio station as clear as possible, but  I could still only hear 3 out of 4 words because of the static. 

There was also trying to get the TV antenna at the right spot so the picture was somewhat clear.  Now, as I sit in my living room watching HD quality games on a big screen TV, I think, "how did we ever watch the games back then?"   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...