Jump to content

Really good article on O'hearn, authored by Brit Ghiroli


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

https://theathletic.com/4930538/2023/10/05/orioles-ryan-ohearn-success/

"When O’Hearn showed up at spring training, the Orioles’ trio of hitting coaches — Ryan Fuller, Matt Borgschulte and Cody Asche — didn’t just have a plan; they had a whole portfolio on how to help O’Hearn improve.

They fixed his posture first, eliminating the hunching that allowed him to drive the ball to left field really well but exposed him with anything inside. He started hitting balls on a backspin to right field. They worked with him on understanding how to hit breaking balls better, in the air and not pounded into the ground."

The insight into how the hitting coaches work is really interesting. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Chelsea_Phil said:

Given that he is one for his last 32, is he going back to his old habits?

Or was he wearing down after a long season when he'd never been used that much in the past?  Hopefully, this week off will be a help in that regard since most of our guys have never played as much as they have this year.

Edited by NCRaven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Chelsea_Phil said:

Given that he is one for his last 32, is he going back to his old habits?

It's a fair question, but I'd also suspect there are a number of likely causes not associated with regression. A review of his at bats over that stretch might answer that question. 

I thought the article gave an interesting insight into the psyche of the team and the way the coaches interact with the players. I'd love to get a better insight into what the pitching coaches are doing to help the pitchers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I do think we have an excellent coaching staff.   Getting players from poorly coached teams and coaching ‘em up is an excellent way to get cheap value.  The dynastic O’s teams did that with great frequency.  

It really helps to have guys who are coachable, either because they're young or because they see the need to improve. (One interesting by-product of a low, low payroll.) I have to think most teams have capable coaches, but they can't help much if the players won't listen to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Hicks left the Y's and performed well with the O's, my Yankee-fan friends here all griped about how bad a hitting coach the Yankees have. And soonafter, contrary to their usual style, the hitting coach was fired. What aspect exactly--content of his advice, rapport with the hitters, etc.--was the problem I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if he changed nothing in terms of strategy.  Look at what he traded recently right handed batters. I feel like it is more important to him to be innovative, and develop players that have been forgotten or have failed in the major leagues than it is to actually win a World Series. Obviously, that’s the end goal of all the things he’s doing, but he wants to do it in a way that looks innovative, and it looks like he knows more about the players that failed and how to fix them than any other person. I honestly believe that is why Hyde has been here so long. He does everything that he’s told and they don’t want to bring in a manager that won’t do that. I wouldn’t be surprised if he has a lineup made up for him every day and I also wouldn’t be surprised if the whole game plan was planned out for him. What do you do when and where.. Obviously the numbers mean a lot in baseball and are extremely  helpful but they’re not everything. 
    • I'll celebrate whoever we get in a high echelon of MLB talent, but unfortunately unpacking this season too soon I think I don't even really want to win the Burnes bidding. Elias will value the next half season of information on Felix, Grayson and Bradish to figure out who goes with Eflin.     The growth he showed this year winning the Burnes and Eflin trade markets adds confidence he'll staff the top of the pitching roster appropriately in July 2025. If he is very risk averse with Kremer, Povich and Suarez, people would flip out but people like Kyle Gibson, Patrick Corbin and Jose Quintana hit me as safe innings he might actually pursue.
    • The team's valuation only matters at time of sale. The owner's wealth in an uncapped sport like MLB determines how much the team can spend. Steve Cohen by any metric available has tons more millions to SPEND than Hal Steinbrenner. Steve Cohen has even operated at a deficit over 100 million before which I believe was in 2023. And most importantly he has the WILL to get into the deepest of pools when it comes to FA as he has already shown in his short time owning the Mets.
    • I think Bregman would be an awesome fit. I don’t know how you decide westburg/JH and who plays second, but Bregman would be that veteran RH hitter who has experience and enjoys the big moment. Maybe we try JH at CF officially. Maybe he’s super utility next year, but that would be a weird way to develop a #1 prospect. but I would love it if we got Bregman. 
    • The Musgrove deal was viewed as a team-friendly hometown discount extension at the time.
    • Richest owner and richest team are different things. If you go by most valuable teams the Yankees are very high up there. If you go by richest owner it's the Clippers owner.
    • It's actually the Cowboys but I don't think they need any pitching.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...