Jump to content

Separating regular season success from postseason failure


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Agree on your points, Frobby.

While the ALDS seems like a bait and switch team from what we've seen over the season -- especially how they managed to rebound positively after a few losses -- the credit due to Texas is immense. They hit just about everything, and hard. The homers came on pitches that weren't terrible - even if they weren't located where Adley wanted them. I only recall them hitting in to one double play (last night), and over 3 games don't really remember many ground outs. They just have it all working right now and we did not.

 

I don't expect our team's playoff odds to increase too much next year despite the success in 2023. It's still going to be a long way to go and we won't have the benefit of an elite closer missing bats from the start. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I know a lot of what I wrote here will feel like Captain Obvious stuff to many of you.  It just helps me to write it out, think it through a little and not overreact to what I just saw, but not ignore it either.   It’s a very good team, with a bright future, but it probably needs some elite help to become a great one.  Kind of like the very good Orioles teams of the early to mid-60’s needed Frank Robinson to unlock the full potential of those great teams.   


 

As always, @Frobby, you provide an excellent synopsis. I don't think you are Capt. Obvious. I appreciate the clarity and completeness.

The bolded part caught my eye. Do you see a player, currently playing, who might potentially fill the "Frank Robinson-like" need for the 2024 O's? Would a guy like Pete Alonso fit that bill? Rumor has it he might be available as the Mets are rebuilding and need to shed payroll. Apparently they have not tendered him an extension and there has been a rather seismic shift in the Mets leadership. Any thoughts on him or others who might satisfy that need? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue was not a failure of the post-season as in contrast to the regular season... but rather, a continuation of the same. The problems that plagued us with Texas began over a month ago... inability to get hits, absolute shellacking to our pitching crew. 

I'm uncertain as to what changed over the last several weeks, but perhaps it's a "number of games" issue... given more games, perhaps we would again pull out above average. But in a one series elimination, we balked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

As always, @Frobby, you provide an excellent synopsis. I don't think you are Capt. Obvious. I appreciate the clarity and completeness.

The bolded part caught my eye. Do you see a player, currently playing, who might potentially fill the "Frank Robinson-like" need for the 2024 O's? Would a guy like Pete Alonso fit that bill? Rumor has it he might be available as the Mets are rebuilding and need to shed payroll. Apparently they have not tendered him an extension and there has been a rather seismic shift in the Mets leadership. Any thoughts on him or others who might satisfy that need? Thanks.

I don't see Alonso as a great fit. His OBP was worse than Mountcastle's this year and Camden Yards would suppress his righty power. Cody Bellinger would be great but I doubt the O's open the wallet for him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think deep down every Orioles fan knew that the team overachieved in the regular season. Which is not a bad thing. I like overachievers. But from that to think they were WS favorites, that was not realistic, unfortunately. The key is to keep improving and to keep knocking on the door.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Idaho_OriolesFan said:

I think the issue was not a failure of the post-season as in contrast to the regular season... but rather, a continuation of the same. The problems that plagued us with Texas began over a month ago... inability to get hits, absolute shellacking to our pitching crew. 

I'm uncertain as to what changed over the last several weeks, but perhaps it's a "number of games" issue... given more games, perhaps we would again pull out above average. But in a one series elimination, we balked. 

Good point. September was a struggle... the team was exhausted by the end of the season, and not just physically, but psychologically as well. In fact, I would say more the latter than the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

I think deep down every Orioles fan knew that the team overachieved in the regular season. Which is not a bad thing. I like overachievers. But from that to think they were WS favorites, that was not realistic, unfortunately. The key is to keep improving and to keep knocking on the door.

This goes back to the fangraphs stuff.

This year's team both won more games than their RS/RA would indicate and they scored more runs than their underlying metrics would predict.

Neither of those are generally sustainable year to year.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby what you just wrote in your OP is basically what I wrote in my "It's ok to not win the WS or even make the playoffs" thread.  I got completely lambasted for it lol. 

 

 

As I said then, the O's imo greatly out performed in many aspects, but they were still NEVER ELITE IN ANY OF THEM.   They were below average to average in hitting and pitching for the first half of the year and rose to average to a little above average by end of year.  But they were never elite. 

And to win a playoff series and go to the WS?  Where every game and every pitch is magnified?  You need elite stars in a least some positions of your team.  Kind of like the NFL where a great QB, left tackle, Defensive End, and WR can carry a team all the way.    Besides GH I don't think the O's imo have that.  Perhaps GR could be some day, but not right now.  With Gunner he just has that great athletic ability, and the ability to rise to the occasion, that most players do not have.  You could even see it when he scored from 2nd where he slid head first into home.  That is elite athletic ability.  Not just baseball ability.  Elite athleticism. 

 

Adley is ok.  Very good teammate and a good leader.  But I don't see elite athletic ability from him.  Perhaps as I said in my thread some of the youngsters can mature and develop into elite...obviously Holliday could.....but if not they are going to either have to sign a couple or trade for a couple more.

 

Of course the odds of PA ever giving the go ahead to sign anyone elite is slim to none. 

Edited by OnlyOneOriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...