Jump to content

MASN TV viewership has big increase


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

 

The surprising AL East champion Baltimore Orioles surged 65% on MASN up to a 4.23 rating, while the Cincinnati Reds were also up 65% to a 4.74 on Bally Sports Ohio.

 

Rangers, Pirates, Orioles, Reds post biggest local MLB viewership increases
https://awfulannouncing.com/ratings/rangers-pirates-orioles-reds-biggest-local-mlb-increases-2023-season.html

Edited by Going Underground
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So does a 4.23 local rating mean that 4.23% of local viewers are watching the Orioles?   Or does the number signify something else?

Looka like ratings used to be higher.

Nationals had the third lowest local viewers watching the game against other programming. 

MLB Regional Sports Networks See 7% Gain For 2023 Season
https://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybrown/2023/10/05/mlb-regional-sports-networks-see-7-gain-for-2023-season/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

So does a 4.23 local rating mean that 4.23% of local viewers are watching the Orioles?   Or does the number signify something else?

Looka like ratings used to be higher.

One ratings point is equal to 1% of households with televisions. Baltimore has 1,119,480 TV households. So 4.23 rating should be equivalent to 47,354 household viewership.

TV ratings have been continually decreasing for years and years across the board. 47,354 might not seem that high, but there's 162 games in a season and I'm not sure how many games per year the typical fan watches. It also doesn't include out of market viewership as well as streaming.

Edited by dzorange
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dzorange said:

One ratings point is equal to 1% of households with televisions. Baltimore has 1,119,480 TV households. So 4.23 rating should be equivalent to 47,354 household viewership.

TV ratings have been continually decreasing for years and years across the board. 47,354 might not seem that high, but there's 162 games in a season and I'm not sure how many games per year the typical fan watches. It also doesn't include out of market viewership as well as streaming.

Yes, but remember that is just the Baltimore defined TV market which is just 10 counties, MASN's reach is much larger but obviously viewership falls off the further from Baltimore.  I would also guess advertising is taking a big hit or at least in flux-before streaming/MLB package it was a easily targeted, relatively narrow audience (males 18-34) which matches perfectly with beer.   Those are also the most likely to stream or use the MLB package and are not exposed to most ads hence increased in game ads ie gambling.  Unfortunately for MASN cable skews to a much less desirable demographic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SemperFi said:

Yes, but remember that is just the Baltimore defined TV market which is just 10 counties, MASN's reach is much larger but obviously viewership falls off the further from Baltimore.  I would also guess advertising is taking a big hit or at least in flux-before streaming/MLB package it was a easily targeted, relatively narrow audience (males 18-34) which matches perfectly with beer.   Those are also the most likely to stream or use the MLB package and are not exposed to most ads hence increased in game ads ie gambling.  Unfortunately for MASN cable skews to a much less desirable demographic.

I think it's more online gambling these days than beer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it's more online gambling these days than beer.

Agreed, that's why I say in flux.  I'm MLB package so I don't see all the ads but noticed much more in-game ads-it's much easier to tell (or sell) a 10 second gambling story than a comparable consumer market ad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SemperFi said:

Agreed, that's why I say in flux.  I'm MLB package so I don't see all the ads but noticed much more in-game ads-it's much easier to tell (or sell) a 10 second gambling story than a comparable consumer market ad. 

 

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it's more online gambling these days than beer.

I stream the games out of the market. Let me introduce you guys to Jay. We're like best friends now and I know every word he's going to say for the entire 30 seconds.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • The game is already tied. If he gets thrown out, the O's still have a runner in scoring position and just one out. You really didn't have much to lose by sending him there, with a chance to end the game.
    • Yes.  He’s not a great bunter but at least try it once.   Santander was today’s choker.  He’s gotta be able to hit a freaking fly ball there.  
    • Same exact question Ravens fans ask every season.  No killer instinct.  In the game’s biggest moments, they come up small.  Exactly what you saw today.  Pathetic 
    • Should we have gone with a suicide or safety squeeze with Mullins? He might be better at bunting than hitting deep fly balls. Just a thought. 
    • I agree with the second but not the first. If the first fails, that's an extra out. If the second fails then they just get an out at home instead of an out at first, which is not really relevant with Gunnar going to 3rd. For the first case I'd think you need to be like 80% to succeed for it to be right, but for the second like 20%.
    • Bump. Tonight's game wasn't just "winnable" -- it would have been one of the top 2-3 wins of the season. Down 2 in the 9th and we come out single, single, walk, double to tie the game and have two of our fastest runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs, with our 2-3-4 hitters coming up next.  And our guys gagged. They wilted under pressure. They choked.  Again.  This has happened so many times this season that I believe we need to consider the real possibility that the Orioles as currently constructed lack the character, stamina, -- the heart, if you will -- to win games like this. I think these players fail so often because they expect to fail. I remember after we won it all in '83 reporters were interviewing Ken Singleton in the locker room and one of them asked if the Orioles had been lucky. "You make your own luck" he responded. Well, the 2024 Orioles are making their own bad luck over and over again. How does that cycle of failure come to an end? I wish I knew.
    • I know the OH hates Holliday, but it's a no brainer keeping him over Soto. We're talking about bench players who are going to, at most, have a small role in a few games. Soto has no pop and is slow. He's a warm body as it is. Holliday's ability to run can be very useful in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...