Jump to content

2023 #7 Prospect Enrique Bradfield Jr. - CF


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I thought of another pretty good comp for Bradfield - Willie Wilson, former Royals CF who had a .285/.326/.375 line, stole 668 bases and was a plus CF.   I think Bradfield will have a bigger BA/OBP spread than Wilson, but otherwise that’s a pretty good fit.   

Mickey Rivers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs gives Billy Hamilton one of the top 30 Age-23 seasons of the last 10 years as the league got its first look at him his rookie year.

2013 AAA and 2014 MLB he was almost exactly .650 OPS both seasons.

He didn't go to college so was posting his 100+ SB years in the low minors when Enrique at those ages was one of the Commodores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Mickey Rivers?

I think Rivers is one step further than Wilson in the direction of a guy with a high BA but a low walk rate, and that’s not likely to be Bradfield. 

Wilson: .285/.326/.376

Rivers: .295/.327/.397
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curtis Goodwin's half season with us was his Age-22 season, and then this one worked out pretty well.     1996 Wells gave us ~3 WAR and 20 good postseason innings, which today is a deal on Corbin Burnes you might have to sign up in blood for.

December 26, 1995: Traded by the Baltimore Orioles with Trovin Valdez (minors) to the Cincinnati Reds for David Wells.

Prorated to a full season's numbers, Fangraphs baserunning numbers figure Goodwin would have been one of MLB's five most valuable players on the bases that year.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&type=8&month=0&ind=0&startdate=&enddate=&season1=1995&season=1995&qual=300&sortcol=18&sortdir=default&team=0&pagenum=1

 

 

 

Edited by Just Regular
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

How great would it be if EBJ developed even a little power, say up to the .425-.435 level

5-10 homers and 40-45 doubles and triples combined.

That would be great.

Hit 280ish, walk a lot and put up those power numbers. That would be fantastic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just Regular said:

Fangraphs gives Billy Hamilton one of the top 30 Age-23 seasons of the last 10 years as the league got its first look at him his rookie year.

2013 AAA and 2014 MLB he was almost exactly .650 OPS both seasons.

He didn't go to college so was posting his 100+ SB years in the low minors when Enrique at those ages was one of the Commodores.

The Commodores?

image.thumb.jpeg.e42e92d879213dcd5acc7b80c870a0b4.jpeg

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably going to be an unpopular opinion, but I feel like EBJ is getting overrated a good bit. Granted, I haven’t watched him play, but looking at stats and reading scouting reports, it seems like he’s an all defense, stolen base threat, with zero power, and a below average hit tool. His speed and defense seem to make him a good floor bet to be a Billy Hamilton type, but it feels like there is very little ceiling above that for upside. There’s some value in that, but he’s basically an OF Jorge Mateo. I’d argue Mateo has more upside though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oriolefan1035 said:

This is probably going to be an unpopular opinion, but I feel like EBJ is getting overrated a good bit. Granted, I haven’t watched him play, but looking at stats and reading scouting reports, it seems like he’s an all defense, stolen base threat, with zero power, and a below average hit tool. His speed and defense seem to make him a good floor bet to be a Billy Hamilton type, but it feels like there is very little ceiling above that for upside. There’s some value in that, but he’s basically an OF Jorge Mateo. I’d argue Mateo has more upside though.

As of today, it is thought that he has more upside hit tool than Mateo’s present value. It wouldn’t be that much of a stretch to say he could hit as well now as Mateo. Not because he is that good, but Mateo is that bad with the bat. Also, he is probably faster than Mateo(marginally because they are both fast but he is a half step faster). 
People want more power out of him for some illusion that he will just be attacked because he won’t take the pitcher deep. I don’t understand that because him on base has a decent opportunity at becoming a double simply from a stole base. Also, the disruption on the base path is a factor beyond the measurable OPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference among EBJ and other questionable hit tool players cited is that EBJ has batting eye.  He may yield .80pts OBP delta above his BA.  Hamilton, Pierre, Mateo, etc were not same in that regard.
 

I shared this in another prospect thread on the minors board, but worth reiterating.  EBJ with elite defense, elite baserunning and .425 slug (mentioned earlier in thread)…well that’s peak Kenny Lofton and 7-8 WAR/162.  I’m not saying that EBJ will ever reach that level, just looking to set perspective on what his skill set means if the hit tool develops. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Not Tony, but he’s going to start out on one of the DSL teams again.  Was hoping maybe he’d start at FCL. Maybe he lights up DSL and only has a short stay in the Dominican?
    • He's accepted an option before when he was struggling iirc, but they can't just option him, he has to agree and he probably would, he's always been a team guy. Nothing changes with his pay.
    • I don’t disagree. You could make a lot of cases for or against acceptable production (or lack thereof) based of player level and respective age. I simply don’t think this player is a must keep as many are insinuating. Luckily we’re all just armchair GMs and can hazard guesses and opinions all day long without real repercussion. 
    • In September, we'll look back at this as the low point of the season. I'm watching the A's and Rockies in the 12th inning right now and these are some bad offenses.   Although - there are several Oakland pitchers I would love to have in the Baltimore bull pen. 
    • Well I didn’t realize that.  I just read he had options.  I would at least say look if he agrees to go down he will at least play.  I don’t know what his pay structure is if he chooses to be optioned.  If it results in a pay cut then I wouldn’t do it in that case.  
    • @Tony-OH do we know anything about why Liranzo hasn’t played in a game at an affiliate this season? I haven’t seen anything indicating that he is injured. If Liranzo is not injured, it seems odd that he wouldn’t be playing given the positive press he has received here and elsewhere.
    • Big kid for a catcher. Has pop, stance reminds me a little of O’Hearn. No idea how he is defensively but this guy looks to be every part of a backup catcher someday until Basallo makes his way through the minors. Excellent trade for both teams.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...