Jump to content

Bowden: Burnes potential suitors including Os


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

What are the Brewers looking to do next season? Rebuild or compete?

If they are trying to compete, they need offense. Perhaps the trade includes a Santander, Mountcastle, Hays, and/or Mullins? 

I also think the O's need Devin Williams. Again, what are the Brewers trying to do next year though?

If they are trying to rebuild, what prospects bag Burnes? Williams? Both?

Ortiz, Westburg, Cowser, Povich, Beavers, McDermott could get us both

Only one year of Burnes is a big deal.  An alternate approach says half the number of prospects gets you double the years of Cease and Robert Stephenson could be had in FA for $4-6 million AAV with prospects left over for the trade deadline.  If Mike Elias has shown us anything, it's that he has a disciplined approach toward valuation.

I would love to get Devin Williams, but it might be more advantageous to try to work a separate deal for him alone.  Maybe Hays, or Ortiz and a lottery ticket if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
28 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

ESPN proposes the big move of Burnes for Mayo straight up.  Who bites?

Why would you give a Uber prospect for 1 year of a pitcher you’re probably not going to extend. If you could buy out 2024 and add 2-3 years…..something like 4/60 that would be a different story.

Say 13, 13, 15, 19 million per or something like that. Maybe they could include some bonus money to make it more attractive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

Why would you give a Uber prospect for 1 year of a pitcher you’re probably not going to extend. If you could buy out 2024 and add 2-3 years…..something like 4/60 that would be a different story.

Say 13, 13, 15, 19 million per or something like that. Maybe they could include some bonus money to make it more attractive.

 

Why would Burnes sign something like that?  That’s ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Closer to 80?

Put it this way: 

After  traded for Jose Berrios, he was extended one year before free agency for 7/$119 mm.  He had a career ERA+ of 108 at the time.  

After Seattle traded for Luis Castillo, he was extended one year before free agency for 5/$108 mm.   He had a career  ERA+ of 124 at the time.

Burnes has a career ERA+ of 129.   

I’m guessing it would take 6/$150 mm to convince Burnes to extend.   

 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Put it this way: 

After  traded for Jose Berrios, he was extended one year before free agency for 7/$119 mm.  He had a career ERA+ of 108 at the time.  

After Seattle traded for Luis Castillo, he was extended one year before free agency for 5/$108 mm.   He had a career  ERA+ of 124 at the time.

Burnes has a career ERA+ of 129.   

I’m guessing it would take 6/$150 mm to convince Burnes to extend.   

 

I’m in ….but I don’t expect John Angelos would be in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

I agree after Tony's write up.  I think a lot of us were thinking less of Mayo until then (except Roy).  I wouldn't pull the trigger either, but a Burnes trade puts this staff near the top in the bigs.

I like Burnes a lot, I just don’t want to put that many eggs in a one-year basket.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

I agree after Tony's write up.  I think a lot of us were thinking less of Mayo until then (except Roy).  I wouldn't pull the trigger either, but a Burnes trade puts this staff near the top in the bigs.

Mayo’s OPS this season was .973 and our 4th best prospect per MlB.com. Tony’s take makes you feel good but I’m not sure how you could think less of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This Oriole team has much better talent.  Gunner Henderson, Jordan Westberg, Adley, Santander, Grayson, and Corbin Burnes don’t have a 4-32 streak in them.  Even if they fill the rest of the positions with OH posters.  I think a rotation of Burnes, Grayson, and Kremer as your top 3 is a better than 500 team the rest of the way at least.  The jury is out on Povich but if he pitches as well as he has the Orioles with this offense will have a good chance to win when he starts.  Is the team good enough to win it all?  They need help most likely.  One consistent starter and a couple of better arms in the bullpen.  This team is going to the playoffs.  To think they are not at this point is based on emotion and not anything else.  
    • It’s funny that people are wanting to bring back Tanner Scott and his 6.1 walk rate, but balking at McDermott and his 5.5 walk rate. I’m leery of McDermott too, but as they say, “any port in a storm,” so no reason not to give him a try.
    • It sort of makes no sense, his GB% is much higher than last year but his HR/FB went from 10% last year to 26% this year. Walks are way up too.
    • Suarez and Irvin were always going to regress. You didn’t think they would be sub 3 ERA pitchers did you?  Irvin is a solid guy for the back of the rotation but that’s what he is, a back of rotation guy. They are pieces you need to eat innings and keep you in most games but these aren’t world beaters on the mound. Suarez is a good story but there is a reason he has had the career he has had. The fear that we will slowly sink is an unfounded and irrational fear. The team has to get better and they have to improve on obvious needs but we don’t need to go overboard here.  All teams have holes they need to address.
    • Good point.  Every now and then he looks like vintage Cano from early last year but he’s no longer trustworthy.
    • Speaking of scar tissue, a review of our storied/checkered past shows an uglier picture than we like to recall... St. Louis Browns 1902-1953: 52 years, 1 WS (1944), loss. Baltimore Orioles 1954-1983: 30 years, 6 WS (3-3), plus 2 more ALCS losses. Orioles 1984-2023: 40 years, 6 playoffs losses (1 WC, 2 ALDS, 3 ALCS).
    • Cano is having an awful season. He's been worth -0.3 fWAR with a 4.62 FIP. I know you have to use the arms you have, but you can't utilize Cano like it's 2023, he's terrible and should be the lowest-leverage reliever out of the pen right now. He's carrying the same BABIP as last year, but his results are awful.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...