Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Awful:

 

https://nypost.com/2024/01/18/sports/astros-emerging-as-possible-josh-hader-fit-in-mlb-free-agency/
 

There’s growing belief the White Sox could hold onto Dylan Cease until the trade deadline. The Orioles have the best prospects but don’t want to part with top infield prospect Jordan Westburg.
 

 

What if Westburg is the 2nd piece? It's easy to say it's awful if you only hear 1 name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, orioles22 said:

I hoped that Westburg would be the player they wanted. I think Ortiz will be better in the long run.

What position does Westburg play when Holliday is promoted?  Where does Ortiz play if the O's keep Westburg.  The O's don't need 8 utility players.  I'm sure we don't know the whole story and I like Westburg, but Westburg, if he's the main piece wouldn't keep me from making this deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, orioles22 said:

I hoped that Westburg would be the player they wanted. I think Ortiz will be better in the long run.

I wouldn't mind Westburg going to CWS but I'm guessing they are asking for either Cowser/Kjerstad + Westburg. That's likely too much for Cease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Malike said:

I wouldn't mind Westburg going to CWS but I'm guessing they are asking for either Cowser/Kjerstad + Westburg. That's likely too much for Cease.

Is it though? You’d all still have Holliday, Mayo, Basallo, one of Cowser/Kjerstad, Bradfield, Ortiz, and literally everyone else from last year who contributed to a 101 win team. They’re not giving up more for Luzardo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SoxFan3344 said:

Is it though? You’d all still have Holliday, Mayo, Basallo, one of Cowser/Kjerstad, Bradfield, Ortiz, and literally everyone else from last year who contributed to a 101 win team. They’re not giving up more for Luzardo 

I'd say so because it's not just going to end with those 2 players. They wanted two top prospects, check. Those names are likely listed, then they want a couple more on the bubble, and giving up a Povich/McDermott in addition to whomever else they throw in is too much in my opinion. I'm also not very high on Cease, I hate the way his statcast data is trending and his pitch values tanked. 

A lot of people here think he's been 2022 Dylan Cease for 4 years and that year is the outlier.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do the folks here think that Westburg should be on the untouchable list? 

Depends on the whole package to me but in the end it’s Elias job to evaluate talent and if he thinks that highly of Westburg I have to trust him on it.    I’m guessing he’s okay giving up some combination of Cowser, Ortiz, Norby, Beavers, etc., which should be enough to get a deal done talent wise.  Looks like Getz is higher on the guys he can’t get.    It’s still just a negotiation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Malike said:

What if Westburg is the 2nd piece? It's easy to say it's awful if you only hear 1 name.

The report said the Os don’t want to part with Westburg. I’m taking that comment at face value and that’s absurd.

We need Cease a lot more than we need Westburg and Westburg makes much more sense to deal than Kjerstad or Cowser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The report said the Os don’t want to part with Westburg. I’m taking that comment at face value and that’s absurd.

We need Cease a lot more than we need Westburg and Westburg makes much more sense to deal than Kjerstad or Cowser.

So at face value "they don't want to part with Westburg" with no other context suggests its a 1:1 deal. I agree, that's awful. If you believe the insiders on the Sox site, they claim it's Cowser/Kjerstad + Westburg. They will want more after that as well. Still awful?

Edited by Malike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The report said the Os don’t want to part with Westburg. I’m taking that comment at face value and that’s absurd.

We need Cease a lot more than we need Westburg and Westburg makes much more sense to deal than Kjerstad or Cowser.

Maybe we can have Cease and keep Westburg too.   You can keep playing pretend GM with Chicago White Sox while Elias does the real thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Malike said:

So at face value "they don't want to part with Westburg" with no other context suggests its a 1:1 deal. I agree, that's awful. If you believe the insiders on the Sox site, they claim it's Cowser/Kjerstad + Westburg. They will want more after that as well. Still awful?

Personally I’m ok with Kjerstad and Westburg, I don’t need another piece that IMO helps both teams accomplish what they’re looking for 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoxFan3344 said:

Personally I’m ok with Kjerstad and Westburg, I don’t need another piece that IMO helps both teams accomplish what they’re looking for 

That certainly changes the picture some, but I don't know how realistic it is. I'm sure Getz would want some lotto tickets or high upside youngins thrown in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SoxFan3344 said:

Is it though? You’d all still have Holliday, Mayo, Basallo, one of Cowser/Kjerstad, Bradfield, Ortiz, and literally everyone else from last year who contributed to a 101 win team. They’re not giving up more for Luzardo 

Yeah, but your argument is that we should pay Getz’ ask because we can afford to not because it’s a fair deal for each side.   Cease guarantees us nothing.   We’d like to have him but we don’t have to have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go out on a limb and say that there is zero chance Getz is proposing Westburg as the headliner with Beavers and Povich. He's asking for Cowser/Kjerstad + Westburg and likely Povich/McDermott and a 4th piece.

If the deal was Westburg/Beavers/Povich, Cease would have been announced as an Oriole already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's low hanging fruit to laugh at the doom-and-gloom crowd, the sky-is-falling Chicken Littles, and the run-for-the-hills Billies.  So, fruit duly plucked. 🤣 However, there is some truth within their pessimistic outlook.  It's absolutely fair to be concerned about our pitching.  Who's to say who is right or wrong in how much concern there should be?  Well, we all have a say.  It's why we're here.  The beloved @Roy Firestone is admittedly the most pessimistic Game Thread poster in history, yet no one questions his love of the O's.  Nor should we berate those with strongly pessimistic views about our chances as being less of a fan.   It's just my two cents, but I think it's readily apparent that we need to add to our pitching and I believe Elias will address it.  A quality starter and a reliever or two would likely do wonders for the team... and our collective sanity.   I just don't feel we'd need to deal Holliday, or Mayo, or Basallo to get there.  Then again, I may be wrong.  
    • Who are the Os top three? Burnes, GRod, and…….?
    • There never is going to be an “all in” year.   Elias made the mostly in move by getting Burnes and then the baseball gods decided to cut down Bradish, Means, and Wells.  Coulombe too.  The Dodgers are “all in” every single year.  1 WS trophy in a shortened season. Elias is going to make some moves but he’s not dipping into the top 3 prospects and maybe not even Kjerstad.   You can’t make a habit of trading guys with 6+ years of control for players with minimal amounts of control.  Yeah, this was the Burnes year and we got some bad luck.  Maybe we can still piece it together but Elias is only going to do that up to a point. As far as next year, who knows.  
    • I don't disagree at all.  I just put a much stronger emphasis on the top two guys in a series instead of three.  In most five game series your third starter will only pitch once.  Win the division and Kremer may make only 4 postseason starts even as our #3 all the way through the World Series.  That's why I would be focused on bullpen arms instead of a starter.  I love the idea of a starter with years of control to help offset the loss of Burnes to FA but I just don't see anyone that attractive that will be available.  This team's path through the AL is to have Burnes and Rodriguez be aces and the lineup to continue to be the best in the league regardless of who the third or fourth starters are.  
    • Your comment basically confirms what I said. You admit that Suarez and Irwin would regress, which they have. As a result of that regression, they are no longer reliable members of a powerful rotation. Therefore, we will slowly sink unless Mike gets someone better, and not just one, either. How is it an irrational fear to say we will slowly sink if we don’t make acquisitions? You just agreed that Suarez and Irwin aren’t adequate, so the concern is completely valid. Add to that Kremer’s spotty performance and injury concerns, and Povich remaining a huge question mark. Outside our top two, we got nobody dependable. And that’s just discussing the starters. your comment is curious because you try to refute what I was saying but instead confirm it, and you close by admitting they “have to improve on obvious needs”  We can debate what would constitute “going overboard,” but it’s clear from his past transactions that Mike cares a lot about the price he pays for an asset, so I think, far from overpaying, he’s more likely to duplicate what he did last season.
    • More should have been done to improve the team's rotation and Bullpen in the offseason.  Since John Angelos controlled the purse strings, additional spending was just not happening.  I put that on Angelos not Elias.  Does anyone think that Elias would not have liked say $30 million to add to 2024 payroll to strengthen the pitching?  This trade deadline is a time for Rubinstein to prove himself as much as Elias.
    • The Moose hits it!!!! Anyone who sets up their expectations to world series or bust needs good strong blood pressure meds. The year we win it will probably be a year we didn't expect. I'm enjoying the O's are relavent again after way to many years in the wilderness. Get to the dance and take your chances. That's my moto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...