Jump to content

Puck News: Orioles sold to Rubenstein


Orioles Jim

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, interloper said:

No 4am blog from Roch. 

Crickets from MASN.

Watching MASN and reading the blogs from their employees i would sometimes feel like i was watching the old twilight zone episode where the 6-year-old child with God like power had all the adults terrorized and they couldn't express how they really felt.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Orioles5258 said:

Crickets from MASN.

Watching MASN and reading the blogs from their employees i would sometimes feel like i was watching the old twilight zone episode where the 6-year-old child with like power had all the adults terrorized and they couldn't express how they really felt.  

This is kind of a sensitive issue for MASN to report so I wouldnt expect any breaking news there. There will be new MASN ownership for Roch but he still has to be respectful of John in the meantime.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SemperFi said:

Hi Cap-

I think middle of the pack in payroll is a good goal-don't forget that revenue is up 40-50% from that period depending on how you take the snapshot.  

I don't think the owners can move on this by the upcoming owners meetings-new ownership has to be vetted and approved-unless it is fast-tracked to get rid of the Angelos family.

I personally think ME has known about this for some time and has been able to plan accordingly-that's the reason he hasn't left for a better opportunity.  I'm not sure how they would handle FA signings as any large signing bonuses or payments would likely be delayed.  The WFT ran into a similar issue where singing bonuses were delayed by a couple months.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that a lot of that work had already been done.

You don't leak something like this unless you know you're going to get approved.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

Yea my only worry is that it holds up any thing the O's can do for the rest of this offseason

Free agent wise?    No

Trade wise?   I personally think so.  New ownership might have different values on players they want to keep or are okay with trading. Now, this is not to say they couldn’t have told JA their thoughts but I personally think this is a hurdle . 

extension wise?   Yep.   Not gonna extend a player and dish out $100+ m til the dust settles.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

By Spotrac the Orioles 2024 payroll is just over $80M. The median is $147M between Arizona and Colorado. Even if the Orioles just return to the 2012-2018 late Peter Angelos, post-Nats days of spending and are middle of the pack, there’s capacity to nearly double the payroll.

Will be very interesting to see what timetable this deal gets approved on and if it affects the rest of this offseason. Every single player the Orioles have the opportunity to drop big money on now - Gunnar, Adley and Holliday as extensions, Snell and Montgomery as FAs, and Cease as trade & extend - are Boras clients. I imagine it’s going to be very hard to find deals that Boras will agree to that Elias/Sig will run through the computer as positive value. 

If Rubenstein comes in the door wanting to make a splash he’s going to have to get cozy with Boras right away, and that could end up testing Elias’ better judgment. But the Orioles still have many years before their core starts to get expensive and now is the time to start spending. 

This is good/fair analysis and I agree with all of it, but I think the hope is that ME won't have to stamp his seal of approval from a value perspective if ownership is willing to write some checks. That way, Elias and Sig can focus on how a guy will perform, not his dollar value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

MASN isn't going to have any commentary on this until it's official, obviously. 

I am excited for when the dust settles to have all the beat guys come out and let the cat out of the bag on how bad Angelos really was

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

So what happens next offseason if Elias wants to trade Mullins and Hays, while letting Santander leave in FA?  

I'm confused by this question. Was Angelos preventing him for doing that? Have we signed any significant FAs? Have we won a World Series? ... What is the context to that curiosity? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SemperFi said:

Hi Cap-

I think middle of the pack in payroll is a good goal-don't forget that revenue is up 40-50% from that period depending on how you take the snapshot.  

I don't think the owners can move on this by the upcoming owners meetings-new ownership has to be vetted and approved-unless it is fast-tracked to get rid of the Angelos family.

I personally think ME has known about this for some time and has been able to plan accordingly-that's the reason he hasn't left for a better opportunity.  I'm not sure how they would handle FA signings as any large signing bonuses or payments would likely be delayed.  The WFT ran into a similar issue where singing bonuses were delayed by a couple months.

I agree with this, but we just don’t know right now how advanced the approval process is. This deal has been rumored for months and I don’t think it’s a coincidence it becomes confirmed public knowledge right before the owner’s meeting. I’m not expecting it to get full seal of approval next week and have Rubenstein officially take the reins immediately, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if that was the case.

There’s also the weird dynamic of the lease negotiations that probably kept this more under wraps publicly but not necessarily behind the scenes amongst the owners.

I haven’t seen any articles say anything one way or the other in terms of timeline and I think that’s because reporters are still trying to figure that out themselves. Hopefully we get more clarity soon. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Keygans said:

Just heard this got expedited to be done before opening day,   They upped the offer to get it done.  Should get the rest of the MLB owners approval next week.     
 

Like I mentioned before,  there “appears” to be the desire to spend to win.  They know the window we have…   Take it fwiw.    Flame away..

This is great to hear!  I was concerned this process might drag on for a while.  Would be great to celebrate the new ownership on Opening Day and maybe gave Rubenstein throw out the first pitch with a grand introduction to the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Take this comment as being rude. But there is zero and I mean ZERO chance our starting 1st baseman and 4 hitter is traded. 
    • I’ve been intrigued by him since we drafted him. The k rate and ground ball rate is nice. Still a pretty high walk rate (5+ per 9). I wouldn’t mind him getting a look at some point, similar to krook, just to see how his stuff plays. We don’t have a ton of high k guys in the pen. His ability to provide length isn’t a bad thing either. 
    • I’m a bit confused by this post. Rainer is projected to be gone by 12 at the latest. He’s not going to be there at 22, and would be a huge OVERSLOT if he somehow was there. Mentioned in the same sentence as bonemer who was projected as a first round pick at one point but has fallen significantly. He could be an underslot, but the value of going underslot isn’t nearly as high at 22 as it is in the top 10 where you can save significant money.    I also don’t get the connection with Griffen and morlando. Griffen is like Rainer, almost sure fire top 10. Morlando hasn’t really been mocked as a first round pick at all lately. I would be shocked if morlando was not there at 22, but would also be pretty disappointed with him as the pick given there’s a decent chance he’s a lf or 1b only prospect who hasn’t lived up to hitting expectations this year.    that also seems like a real reach for Franco given where he’s ranked and mocked the last few months. If we take a hs outfielder, Slade Caldwell is the one I’d be interested in. Seen a comp or two to Corbin Carrol wi th a little less pop, which wouldn’t be bad to take a shot on and see what our development can do with. 
    • I firmly believe Elias is attempting to build a package around Mountcastle and Kjerstad w/ 2 to 3 lesser valued pieces in exchange for a good starter
    • And here is the coverage map to determine if Fox is airing out game where you live:  https://506sports.com/mlb.php
    • We probably need to consider who we want facing Soto out of the pen. We need a Soto stopper. https://stathead.com/baseball/versus-finder.cgi?player_id1=soto--003jua&utm_medium=sr_xsite&utm_source=br&utm_campaign=2023_01_player_innernav_stathead&__hstc=107817757.2f3f33a24b44870ec4a577029c49e44b.1699920000170.1699920000171.1699920000172.1&__hssc=107817757.1.1699920000173&__hsfp=966217318 Those are his career stats versus all pitchers. He tunes mostly everyone up pretty good. Some lefties stand out though. More as SP though. Just something to think about for what it seems is an inevitable playoff showdown. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...