Jump to content

Is Austin Hays Just an OF Version of Jorge Mateo?


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I just Googled their ages (again) and they're both 28 (both were born in 1995). And you'll get no argument from me that Hays hasn't been more consistent. At least for the the last three years. 

This is one of those cases where a gap in “baseball age” is a year but the actual age gap is two weeks.  They’re the same age for all practical purposes.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I just Googled their ages (again) and they're both 28 (both were born in 1995). And you'll get no argument from me that Hays hasn't been more consistent. At least for the the last three years. 

Ah, you're right that they are almost exactly the same age. They show up as a year apart despite really being ~two weeks apart since both are right near the July 1 cutoff that stats pages use. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jabba72 said:

I dont know what kind of trade value Hays has but Cowser is coming for his job that is for sure. Its going to be an interesting storyline for the season, the OF position battle. Kjerstad in right and Cowser in left, trying to unseat veterans.

See this is the problem. I really don't get the sense that the team has any intention of taking significant ABs away from Hays in 2024. Therein lies the problem (for me at least). With Kjerstad you can at least make the argument that his defense might negate his bat, but Cowser projects to be at least a serviceable defender. WIth that in mind and knowing that the ceiling he has to beat is a realtively hollow 16 HRs, why aren't we collectively pushing for Cowser to play (over Hays) as much as we are for Westburg and Holliday? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

See this is the problem. I really don't get the sense that the team has any intention of taking significant ABs away from Hays in 2024. Therein lies the problem (for me at least). With Kjerstad you can at least make the argument that his defense might negate his bat, but Cowser projects to be at least a serviceable defender. WIth that in mind and knowing that the ceiling he has to beat is a realtively hollow 16 HRs, why aren't we collectively pushing for Cowser to play (over Hays) as much as we are for Westburg and Holliday? 

Because Hay still puts up respectable numbers.  The other two guys still need to prove themselves.

As for Westburg and Holliday, we weren't getting much from Frazier and Mateo, so change was definitely needed there.

That's the difference that I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

See this is the problem. I really don't get the sense that the team has any intention of taking significant ABs away from Hays in 2024. Therein lies the problem (for me at least). With Kjerstad you can at least make the argument that his defense might negate his bat, but Cowser projects to be at least a serviceable defender. WIth that in mind and knowing that the ceiling he has to beat is a realtively hollow 16 HRs, why aren't we collectively pushing for Cowser to play (over Hays) as much as we are for Westburg and Holliday? 

Because Cowser played like a deer in the headlights when he was in the majors last year.  I’m not saying I don’t expect him to improve, I’m explaining why people aren’t “clamoring” for him.  He’ll have to earn it on the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

See this is the problem. I really don't get the sense that the team has any intention of taking significant ABs away from Hays in 2024. Therein lies the problem (for me at least). With Kjerstad you can at least make the argument that his defense might negate his bat, but Cowser projects to be at least a serviceable defender. WIth that in mind and knowing that the ceiling he has to beat is a realtively hollow 16 HRs, why aren't we collectively pushing for Cowser to play (over Hays) as much as we are for Westburg and Holliday? 

Because Cowser looked like poop last year when Hays did alright. Had Cowser out performed Hays like Westburg did Frazier/Mateo then we just might have that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, spleen1015 said:

Because Cowser looked like poop last year when Hays did alright. Had Cowser out performed Hays like Westburg did Frazier/Mateo then we just might have that situation.

So your entire opinion of Cowser changed afer 61 ABs? That sure seems like recency bias to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Because Cowser played like a deer in the headlights when he was in the majors last year.  I’m not saying I don’t expect him to improve, I’m explaining why people aren’t “clamoring” for him.  He’ll have to earn it on the field.  

And what happens if Holliday or Westburg post similar numbers in their first 61 ABs this season? Are we giving up on them like we are with Cowser and settling for medicority over upside? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

And what happens if Holliday or Westburg post similar numbers in their first 61 ABs this season? Are we giving up on them like we are with Cowser and settling for medicority over upside? 

Sadly, many on here will give up on them until they turn it around.  It's what Hangouters tend to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So your entire opinion of Cowser changed afer 61 ABs? That sure seems like recency bias to me. 

Do you know what my opinion of Cowser was before those 61 ABs?

Cowser needs to show it on the field. That's all that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Lol!  Correct, dude! I'm not against anything.  I just feel like maybe the expectations are a little higher than they need to be.  We don't need a number one SP - I mean, it would be great, but the value/cost at this moment would be bad, imo.  So I think there's the chance he's shopping at Ollie's.  Nothing wrong with that to me.  I'm just wondering if there are targets out there that someone is familiar with that would cost little instead of the guys being talked about - top prospects, Kjerstadt, etc. Other than Buddy Groom, LOL, there are no answers.  Fuji was almost equivalent to what I'm talking about here.  I just don't know who as I don't watch games around the league as I know many others here do.
    • Mayo.  His 2024 numbers are incredible, so you’re selling high as far as prospects go.  But his defense is a question mark and as this year shows, he has the least clear path to the majors of the group. Some of that is because of his age relative JH and SB, but it’s clear that JH and SB have clear rolls on this team once they are ready.  Mayo’s path is less clear. 
    • I'm coming around to this idea more and these are all good points, but I still wouldn't give up a whole lot for him.  His season so far this year is giving me a bit of Austin Voth 2022 vibes.  83 IP for us with a 3.04 ERA, 3.96 FIP, 8.3 H/9, 1.1 HR/9, 2.7 BB/9, 7.8 K/9...then he went back to being the Austin Voth he always was.  Maybe it's that they both pitched for the Nationals for a bit at the beginning of their careers, but both careers prior to their "breakout" 2022 and 2024 seasons, respectively, along with their numbers in their "breakout" seasons are eerily similar. I'm not dismissing the idea that he has figured something out, I'm just not willing to risk much betting that he has. 
    • I'm expecting the All-Star game soon. I would have said as quickly as possible after the sale but now I think they will wait until the renovations are complete.
    • I don't like the idea of parting with significant prospects for marginal players. For comparison's sake, we traded for Flaherty last year and gave up basically nothing. Flaherty (even mid season last year) is about as good as some of the guys we are thinking of trading real prospects for. Even if you get an additional year(s) of control, guys like Efflin I'm not trading someone like Norby for. I think we can do better if we are going to jet out the Norbys and Beavers of the world.
    • Maybe we can have an all star game and winter classic in the near future too!
    • I would consider Fedde the main aisle along with relievers like Scott and Estevez.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...