Jump to content

Defense is a factor as to why our top hitting prospects are in AAA


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sanity Check said:

I agree that it's the narrative.  Truth is, they haven't made room for those guys yet, and it's a very convenient reason to keep them down for now.

It was convenient for Mayo to make two errors and for Holliday and Kjerstad each to make one yesterday.  Really feeds that made-up narrative.  🥹

  • Upvote 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree on Holliday.  He looked just fine in ST and could have fine tuned the intricacies of 2B in the majors.  Funny that they have no problem putting Mateo at 2B who has less experience there than Holliday.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the very least your bullet points offer Elias some cover. Holliday seems to be the only one where service time is being controlled. 

Regarding Norby... I just don't see any path for him at all. He's blocked in the IF, and even if he learns how to play the corner OF, he is likely blocked there too. Could it be that the O's are hoping he improves his stock to increase his value at the trade deadline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Disagree on Holliday.  He looked just fine in ST and could have fine tuned the intricacies of 2B in the majors.  Funny that they have no problem putting Mateo at 2B who has less experience there than Holliday.

Mateo had 66 starts at 2B in the minors and 14 in the majors, plus another 10 MLB games as a defensive sub.  That’s way more experience than Holliday.  And, from what I’ve read, his overall defensive skills are better than Holliday’s currently are.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Mateo had 66 starts at 2B in the minors and 14 in the majors, plus another 10 MLB games as a defensive sub.  That’s way more experience than Holliday.  And, from what I’ve read, his overall defensive skills are better than Holliday’s currently are.  

Sorry.  Couldn’t tell on that attempted DP in game #1.   Mateo has more experience in his career, granted.  Holliday has more recent experience.  Were there any plays Holliday failed to make in ST?   If they are waiting for Holliday to have Mateo’s arm and range, it could be a long wait.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It was convenient for Mayo to make two errors and for Holliday and Kjerstad each to make one yesterday.  Really feeds that made-up narrative.  🥹

Oh, it was very convenient to fit the narrative.  I don't recall them throwing the ball around like that in the Spring Training games I saw.  I doubt that Elias and Co. expected these guys would just suck at their respective positions like they did a couple of times yesterday.

BUT, I didn't see the games, so I can't form an opinion on how easy any of the throws were, whether they were hurried, or the run, etc.  The only guy at a fairly new position, in my opinion, was Kjerstad.  

If anyone did see those plays, and they were clearly easy throws with no excuse for not making them, then I'll agree the guys need work.  Sometimes, guys make errors trying to make plays that they maybe shouldn't have tried to make, but that's what most athletes do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

At the very least your bullet points offer Elias some cover. Holliday seems to be the only one where service time is being controlled. 

Regarding Norby... I just don't see any path for him at all. He's blocked in the IF, and even if he learns how to play the corner OF, he is likely blocked there too. Could it be that the O's are hoping he improves his stock to increase his value at the trade deadline?

Norby was in right field last night and was 4 for 6.  Either we find a spot for his bat - maybe the RH DH - or he's becoming more valuable as a trade piece.  Personally, I'd like to see him on the O's and not somewhere else.  He's been solid at AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sanity Check said:

Norby was in right field last night and was 4 for 6.  Either we find a spot for his bat - maybe the RH DH - or he's becoming more valuable as a trade piece.  Personally, I'd like to see him on the O's and not somewhere else.  He's been solid at AAA.

Norby, noted for having a below average arm made two pretty good throws from RF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...