Jump to content

Holliday called up!


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Why’s it funny when it proved what he said was more true than it being about service time?

The only thing it "proved" was that you believe everything Elias tells the media. He was never going to admit what they were doing. This is an organization that treats injury news for it's minor leaguers like Soviet era secrets! 

Feel free to think it proved whatever you want. Elias' actions have not baked up his words several times now, and Actions always speak louder than words, especially when GMs are talking to the media.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

The only thing it "proved" was that you believe everything Elias tells the media. He was never going to admit what they were doing. This is an organization that treats injury news for it's minor leaguers like Soviet era secrets! 

Feel free to think it proved whatever you want. Elias' actions have not baked up his words several times now, and Actions always speak louder than words, especially when GMs are talking to the media.

So if it wasn't about service time, which it wasn't, what was it about? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

If he accepts the Norfolk assignment vs asking for his release, I imagine it was because Wong would not do that and Kemp would. If he asks for his release, then I'm out of reasoning.

I agree, although the other alternative is that Kemp’s contract was like the one that Teheran signed with the Mets where the salary was pro-rated? The Mets DFA’d him 6 days later so only paid that tiny amount of his $2m salary. And maybe Wong was unwilling to agree to that, but Kemp was?

There’s no way Kemp got $1m guaranteed from the Orioles for 10 PA with no strings attached to leave now. Elias had to know that calling up Holliday now was a strong possibility, if not outright predetermined. Either Kemp needs to stay in the org in AAA to keep that salary, or he only got a pro-rated amount for the MLB time. I’m curious what the answer there is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

If he accepts the Norfolk assignment vs asking for his release, I imagine it was because Wong would not do that and Kemp would. If he asks for his release, then I'm out of reasoning.

I highly doubt he forgoes the minor league deal. Birds in the hand and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

The only thing it "proved" was that you believe everything Elias tells the media. He was never going to admit what they were doing. This is an organization that treats injury news for it's minor leaguers like Soviet era secrets! 

Feel free to think it proved whatever you want. Elias' actions have not baked up his words several times now, and Actions always speak louder than words, especially when GMs are talking to the media.

You have to admit, if this was about service time, very illogical to call him up days before the cutoff for a team off to a respectable 6-4 start.   That doesn’t make sense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

So if it wasn't about service time, which it wasn't, what was it about? 

I heard that Holliday was hanging out in the ST clubhouse and in walks in Mike Elias. Jackson was like "Hey! What's up Mike?!", gives him a little dab.

Mike was pissed he didn't call him Mr. Elias. So, sent him down.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The only thing it "proved" was that you believe everything Elias tells the media. He was never going to admit what they were doing. This is an organization that treats injury news for it's minor leaguers like Soviet era secrets! 

Feel free to think it proved whatever you want. Elias' actions have not baked up his words several times now, and Actions always speak louder than words, especially when GMs are talking to the media.

I don’t believe everything he says to the media. But, obviously this wasn’t about getting an extra year. And things played out very closely to what he alluded to in his statement at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The only thing it "proved" was that you believe everything Elias tells the media. He was never going to admit what they were doing. This is an organization that treats injury news for it's minor leaguers like Soviet era secrets! 

Feel free to think it proved whatever you want. Elias' actions have not baked up his words several times now, and Actions always speak louder than words, especially when GMs are talking to the media.

Overall, I think Elias is more available and transparent than most. As a Maryland native living in Colorado, and the Rox GMs here are invisible, unavailable and usually hunted to ground by bloodhounds to get a quote about a roster move.

As to the injury stuff, the O’s operate like an NHL team, and I don’t know if that’s good or bad yet overall (definitely bad for media, gamblers, and fans who want answers).

All that said, I see the handling of JH, the signing of Kemp as a couple significant hiccups by an otherwise quality baseball dude who has still brought the O’s back from the dead.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

You have to admit, if this was about service time, very illogical to call him up days before the cutoff for a team off to a respectable 6-4 start.   That doesn’t make sense.

We don't know what changed. Did Rubenstein decide he would extend Holliday? Did he have second thoughts about rubbing Holiday wrong? Was he really influenced by Holiday's hot start? 

Buck Britton said he was playing with a "chip on his shoulder" so that tells me he was not real happy with being send down. 

Maybe all of that got back and Elias thinks he can no sign him long term so he might as well bring him up to go for the RoY and get the pick. 
 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orioles West said:

Overall, I think Elias is more available and transparent than most. As a Maryland native living in Colorado, and the Rox GMs here are invisible, unavailable and usually hunted to ground by bloodhounds to get a quote about a roster move.

As to the injury stuff, the O’s operate like an NHL team, and I don’t know if that’s good or bad yet overall (definitely bad for media, gamblers, and fans who want answers).

All that said, I see the handling of JH, the signing of Kemp as a couple significant hiccups by an otherwise quality baseball dude who has still brought the O’s back from the dead.

Elias is very available and pretty much a straight shooter with the media, but let's face it, there are things he's just not going to say. I think sometimes people think if you criticize someone over something yu don't like them. That's the furthest thing from the truth.

He makes some headscratching moves sometimes, but in the end, the results are what matters and it's clear after 101 season the results are pretty darn good.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

We don't know what changed. Did Rubenstein decide he would extend Holliday? Did he have second thoughts about rubbing Holiday wrong? Was he really influenced by Holiday's hot start? 

Buck Britton said he was playing with a "chip on his shoulder" so that tells me he was not real happy with being send down. 

Maybe all of that got back and Elias thinks he can no sign him long term so he might as well bring him up to go for the RoY and get the pick. 
 


 

I think all of that is a stretch, personally. It's exceedingly unlikely that this has anything to do with an extension or Holliday being angry or the ownership. 

We do have a likelier reason which is that Elias wanted to avoid Holliday starting off his career against a bunch of LHP, and wanting to confirm that he looks fine at 2B for a few more games. 

It doesn't have to be some contrived super-mysterious reason. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Hays' advanced metrics (see below) for the season are mediocre at best, and he's mostly only started against LHP for the past couple months since he came back from the IL. Hays' speed has also cratered over the past couple years, so he's not a great defensive outfielder anymore because he can't cover ground like he did in 2022 and 2023. His sprint speed has declined precipitously. It's most likely due to an injury, but the team shouldn't put an injured player in a position to possibly hurt himself further and potentially hurt the team if he's adversely affected physically.  There's no reason to roster a replacement level player like this, especially when the team is negligently benching/platooning a big power bat in Kjerstad, sitting Cowser too much as well, and has Norby in AAA who can also play the OF. The O's have multiple young players that need more playing time and can have a big impact on the lineup. Hays can be optioned to Norfolk or traded for cash considerations or a low level prospect if he's not enough of a team player to accept a minors assignment. Kjerstad needs to play every day, and if he comes anywhere close to reaching the kind of production he showed in the upper levels of the minors, not only is he a superior hitter to Hays regardless of splits, but he elevates the Orioles lineup and makes it less susceptible to slumps like we saw in the 2-3 weeks prior to the All Star Break. Moving on from Hays (and making Mullins the 4th OF) and stopping this team's overreliance on platooning with average-at-best players (which doesn't include O'Hearn) is the best way to make that happen.
    • Nor Holliday, nor Basallo, nor Mayo, nor Kjerstad should be traded (nor Cowser, given that we don't have anything other than him that looks like a likely CF of the future). They are all potential impact players with years of cost-effective control ahead of them, you just don't trade that. Obviously I would love Skubal if we can make a deal for him trading a number of prospects and assets that don't include those names, but if we can't I much prefer trading for a lesser option. The difference between that lesser option and Skubal is not big enough to make up for the loss of all of those years of any of those players mentioned. 
    • Glad to have you correct my grammar and spelling now and in the future.  But I must warn you its a full time job.
    • I know some people were asking earlier in game about pinch hitting and why Hyde didn’t. With no Urias adds up even more. 
    • Maybe Hyde has Lenn Sakata on speed dial. 
    • Interesting. I guess Mountcastle or Santander to 2B. Would have been fun to see it.
    • All y'all Orioles fans need to learn how to spell the new majority owner's name.  It's Rubenstein.  Only one "b" and only one "i" kinda toward the end. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...