Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

The 2020-2024 Chicago White Sox should be a cautionary tale for all of us.  A little bad luck and a few bad decisions is all it takes.

Thank you for sharing your perspective.

However a disagree totally and completely. It’s going to take WAY MORE than “a little bad luck” and “a few bad decisions”.

IMO it would take the worse luck ever and horrible decisions in the form of almost self-sabotage in order for us not to be competitive in the next 3 years at least. We have dynasty type assets. With smart decisions from baseball ops, meaningful financial backing from ownership, and a little good fortune, we could be the next Houston Astros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

So with a team that has Gunnar Henderson at age 22 (getting ready to turn 23), Adley Rutshman at 26, Jordan Westburg at 25, Colton Cowser at 24, Grayson Rodriguez at 24 (will be 25 later this season after the season), Ryan Mountcastle at 27, plus all of the talent at AAA; you think this team can crash and burn after this year? 

Were you just talking in hypotheticals? Or were you being serious in application to what the Orioles have right now?

I would challenge ANYONE to cite how one or two realistic trades can have next season or the season after that or even the one after that be 2018 or even 2017.

IMO we have at least 3 more World Series shots regardless of what we do at the deadline. And if we do a few extensions to players like Adley and Gunnar, we will have several more shots after that!

I struggle to see how that "window" talk or even comparisons to 2017/2018 are relevant to this situation (except that it is the same org and they wear pretty much the same uniforms except for the City Connect shirts).

No , this year’s Orioles will NOT crash and burn . I was using the 2018 Orioles as a reference, which they DID crash and burn.  The window for Orioles as a World Series contender opened last season. How long will it stay open ?   It depends on how Elias’s trades , FA , draft & international decisions work out . The better Elias does , the longer Orioles window stays open 

Edited by Allan Bryant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Philip said:

Yes, I really don’t have a problem with the Flaherty trade. The cost was minimal.

I think that now, we need something a little bit more reliable.

The positive impact of Flaherty was even less than minimal. ONE SINGULAR good start. 

It was a very low risk/low reward move that didn’t allow us to potentially maximize on the ultimate outcome of the 2023 season. 

Hopefully the same mistake is not made again for 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Allan Bryant said:

No , this year’s Orioles will NOT crash and burn . I was using the 2018 Orioles as a reference, which they DID crash and burn.  The window for Orioles as a World Series contender opened last season. How long will it stay open ?   It depends on how Elias’s trades , FA , draft & international decisions work out . The better Elias does , the longer Orioles stays open 

IMO, it’s going to take more than Elias. He will need what he never had under Angelos, meaningful ownership support to make additions using all the avenues of team improvement, not just some.

Also, we will need the tremendous efforts from players like Henderson and Rutschman AND a little good fortune in order to MAXIMIZE our true to potential and become multiple World Series winners with this cast of characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

I disagree about the Flaherty and Fujinama "acquisitions" (and I use that term VERY LOOSELY) last season. They both represented "unforced errors" and untimely hedging. Many (including myself) questioned the quality of the front part of our rotation beyond Bradish. It was hard to see that we had excellent depth in the starting rotation. But not the kind of quality up top to succeed through multiple rounds of the playoffs. Flaherty was literally one of the worse starting pitchers that was available. I understand that Elias was working on Cease. But you have to have a credible plan B. You can jump from plan A to plan F (break glass in case of emergency). Flaherty was so bad with us (IMO predictably) that he wasn't an option to start a postseason game and Fujinama wasn't even worth considering to appear on the roster. 

IMO those were hedging trades that were made trying to be as cheap as possible when the roster was already as lost costing as could be. I understand that spending is inevitably an ownership choice. So, hopefully without the stench of Scrooge McAngelos around this time, Elias won't have such limiting hinderances to deal with.

Scrooge McAngelos  ?  Good one !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone may have already mentioned this. Jim Bowden mentioned yesterday by name Kopech and Pham with CWS. 
 

With Oakland Adams and Erceg. Said he thinks Doval would be a good fit with SF if they fall out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Someone may have already mentioned this. Jim Bowden mentioned yesterday by name Kopech and Pham with CWS. 
 

With Oakland Adams and Erceg. Said he thinks Doval would be a good fit with SF if they fall out of it. 

Pham would be interesting since it would be in sharp contrast to the school of thought that Elias cares about character in his players.

 

Edited by Can_of_corn
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

IMO, it’s going to take more than Elias. He will need what he never had under Angelos, meaningful ownership support to make additions using all the avenues of team improvement, not just some.

Also, we will need the tremendous efforts from players like Henderson and Rutschman AND a little good fortune in order to MAXIMIZE our true to potential and become multiple World Series winners with this cast of characters.

A little good fortune to be multiple WS winners?   Man, you are setting yourself up for some serious disappointment.    Is it possible?  Sure.   No one has been as consistently stacked as the Dodgers and they got one.   And they spend!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pham would be interesting since it would be in sharp contrast to the school of thought that Elias cares about character in his players.

 

Where does Rougned Odor fall on the character scale? I honestly don't know, and I guess because it was Bautista, punching him in the face is A-Okay with O's fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pham would be interesting since it would be in sharp contrast to the school of thought that Elias cares about character in his players.

 

I agree. May just be smoke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

A little good fortune to be multiple WS winners?   Man, you are setting yourself up for some serious disappointment.    Is it possible?  Sure.   No one has been as consistently stacked as the Dodgers and they got one.   And they spend!

In the Covid year no less!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

A little good fortune to be multiple WS winners?   Man, you are setting yourself up for some serious disappointment.    Is it possible?  Sure.   No one has been as consistently stacked as the Dodgers and they got one.   And they spend!

It’s not like my bar is set where no other org has gone before.

I’m just saying afraid of big expectations. It’s how I live my life professionally and personally. It’s just how I’m wired. Maybe I will be disappointed but I believe in daring to dream big and going after greatness.

What drew me back to the O’s (after I became biter and uninterested due to the awfulness of the Angelos regime) was when I saw Elias being willing to undertake the task of an extreme tank. That was a sign to me that he has more in mind than mediocrity or just the possibility of competitiveness. But that he would try to chase greatness. And that was/is attractive to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

It’s not like my bar is set where no other org has gone before.

I’m just saying afraid of big expectations. It’s how I live my life professionally and personally. It’s just how I’m wired. Maybe I will be disappointed but I believe in daring to dream big and going after greatness.

What drew me back to the O’s (after I became biter and uninterested due to the awfulness of the Angelos regime) was when I saw Elias being willing to undertake the task of an extreme tank. That was a sign to me that he has more in mind than mediocrity or just the possibility of competitiveness. But that he would try to chase greatness. And that was/is attractive to me.

Well, he went for Jack Flaherty at the deadline last year.  When he doesn’t trade any of his top 3-4 prospects and doesn’t come up with the top 3-4 guys available at the deadline this year how strong will the love affair be then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
    • I get that McCann’s bat is not ideal in the lineup (on the days that he plays). And Mullins struggled really bad for about 6-7 weeks. And Mateo/Urias are no great shakes themselves. But even with all/each of them getting regular to semi-regular ABs, we have the #1 offense in the sport. Like it literally doesn’t get any better. So how do we “need” another bat. Maybe if Mayo is still here, he comes up at some point and strengthens us even more? But I struggle to understand the idea of us needing more offense, especially when the pitching is this shaky. Do you want Cano (who know looks like he’s lost it) and Perez coming in to try to hold games in the 7th/8th inning only to turn it over to Kimbrel in the 9th in October?  Maybe we defeat SEA/NY and reach a World Series for the first time in over 40 years. How would you like our chances of potentially Ranger Suarez vs Irvin/Kremer/Suarez/Povich for 2 times in a potential 7 game series? Seems like the Phills would have a strong advantage there, no?
    • I'm guessing that without a major technological breakthrough we're getting the 2024 version. Which, in the absence of other information, is his career averages with a bit of age-related decline thrown in. I'm assuming the year-to-year variation we see in his record is mostly random noise overlaid on his basic talent level.
    • I'd argue that they became the evil empire circa 1920, when they were drawing 40% more attendance than anyone else in the league, game-day related revenues were almost all revenues at the time, and so they started to have resources and payroll substantially higher than any other team. In 1920 the Yanks drew 1.3M fans, the A's 0.3M. The A's didn't have a chance until Connie Mack pulled a Mike Elias and assembled arguably the greatest collection of relatively cheap, young talent the game had ever seen.
    • Also, check out Fangraph's Top 45 O's Prospects review of Mayo:  
    • https://www.mlb.com/news/max-scherzer-rangers-mets-trade   The Rangers on the hook for 22.5M total. According to Cots, NY is paying 30M this year, which means the Rangers had to pay 13M this year.  So, the Os or anyone else will probably only have to pay 5ishM by the time they would deal for him. https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al-west/texas-rangers/
    • Why not change the bat? The idea that wood bats make sense in the modern era is rather suspect. Give hitters a better weapon and offense will improve. Make the barrel bigger and the bat lighter. Equipment guys could "fit" each hitter like the guys in the Tour equipment trucks do now on the PGA tour. Leave the ball the same. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...