Jump to content

Bring up Mayo already!!


Recommended Posts

On 7/1/2024 at 11:50 PM, Frobby said:

Mayo made his 11th error of the season tonight.   Sorry, On the Verge didn’t tweet a highlight so I can’t embed it here.   

At this point, Elias should just IL Mounty and that buys him some time to see Mayo up here and builds in an excuse if Mayo were to flop. 

I don’t think Elias wants to come off Urias. But… what is best case scenario for Urias in the playoffs?  He’s a defensive replacement?  When?  We like Westburg at 3B and Mateo at 2B. 

Bring Mayo up, if he kills he stays and we trade Urias to an NL team for a non 40 man prospect.   Bradish can be 60 day IL’d for the 40 man spot for Mayo. So we don’t even lost a player. 

Mayo has forced the issue. Who cares if we don’t get as much value back for Urias as we think. Urias is in such a niche role for us. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

At this point, Elias should just IL Mounty and that buys him some time to see Mayo up here and builds in an excuse if Mayo were to flop. 

I don’t think Elias wants to come off Urias. But… what is best case scenario for Urias in the playoffs?  He’s a defensive replacement?  When?  We like Westburg at 3B and Mateo at 2B. 

Bring Mayo up, if he kills he stays and we trade Urias to an NL team for a non 40 man prospect.   Bradish can be 60 day IL’d for the 40 man spot for Mayo. So we don’t even lost a player. 

Mayo has forced the issue. Who cares if we don’t get as much value back for Urias as we think. Urias is in such a niche role for us. 

Pending a trade to clear the logjam, I think Mayo makes more sense in the current roster construction than Kjerstad. There’s some at-bats for Kjerstad to be had. But they come at the expense of Santander, Mounty, O’Hearn, Cowser, Mullins, and Hays: who are all performing well. Whereas Mayo can play nearly everyday at 3B, taking at bats away from Mateo and Urias. At this moment the addition by subtraction of Urias/Mateo at-bats is more valuable.  Urias can be kept around as a defensive replacement and an insurance option should Mayo have a Holliday-esque debut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

Pending a trade to clear the logjam, I think Mayo makes more sense in the current roster construction than Kjerstad. There’s some at-bats for Kjerstad to be had. But they come at the expense of Santander, Mounty, O’Hearn, Cowser, Mullins, and Hays: who are all performing well. Whereas Mayo can play nearly everyday at 3B, taking at bats away from Mateo and Urias. At this moment the addition by subtraction of Urias/Mateo at-bats is more valuable.  Urias can be kept around as a defensive replacement and an insurance option should Mayo have a Holliday-esque debut. 

Urias/Mateo have almost no trade value that would actually help the team. Mateo isn't going anywhere as he's basically the only real backup SS we have. If you want Mayo up and want to trade someone to actually get a piece that will make a difference, then you probably float Westburg out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Malike said:

Urias/Mateo have almost no trade value that would actually help the team. Mateo isn't going anywhere as he's basically the only real backup SS we have. If you want Mayo up and want to trade someone to actually get a piece that will make a difference, then you probably float Westburg out there.

I’m ok trading Urias for a warm body.   For me, adding Mayo just makes a good offense even better.   Trading Westburg would defeat that purpose.  We still have plenty to trade to get a mid rotation starter and 1-2 relievers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

I’m ok trading Urias for a warm body.   For me, adding Mayo just makes a good offense even better.   Trading Westburg would defeat that purpose.  We still have plenty to trade to get a mid rotation starter and 1-2 relievers.

I meant if we wanted a real needle mover. CWS were reportedly asking for Westburg for Cease, say they ask that for Crochet, as an example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Malike said:

I meant if we wanted a real needle mover. CWS were reportedly asking for Westburg for Cease, say they ask that for Crochet, as an example.

That would be a tough decision.  I would steer them to a package headlined by Kjerstad instead.  I think most on here would do neither.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

That would be a tough decision.  I would steer them to a package headlined by Kjerstad instead.  I think most on here would do neither.

Agreed. Was basically saying that Urias/Mateo are probably more valuable to us than another team. I don't think we'd get anything that would really make a difference on the ML team for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Malike said:

Agreed. Was basically saying that Urias/Mateo are probably more valuable to us than another team. I don't think we'd get anything that would really make a difference on the ML team for them.

Probably, but I’m okay with that.  Trade Urias for a B prospect pitcher with a good arm, international pool money, whatever.   Or keep him for depth and figure out something with Kjerstad or another.   Just make room for Mayo.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Probably, but I’m okay with that.  Trade Urias for a B prospect pitcher with a good arm, international pool money, whatever.   Or keep him for depth and figure out something with Kjerstad or another.   Just make room for Mayo.

That would be the biggest upgrade, Mayo. He should be up as soon as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Does SLG determine who’s the best hitter?   James Wood had an OPS about 50 points higher than Mayo’s before Woods’ promotion on Monday.   

Roy is an entertainer, not a journalist.   Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Malike said:

Urias/Mateo have almost no trade value that would actually help the team. Mateo isn't going anywhere as he's basically the only real backup SS we have. If you want Mayo up and want to trade someone to actually get a piece that will make a difference, then you probably float Westburg out there.

Yes, Urias might be closer to DFA’ing than real trade value. Mateo is useful and has some value but we are using that value. 

Westburg shouldn’t go anywhere. 

Until a larger trade is made clearing the logjam or an injury, my preference would be Mayo up, Kjerstad down as I think Mayo takes at bats away from worse players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt Bennett said:

Yes, Urias might be closer to DFA’ing than real trade value. Mateo is useful and has some value but we are using that value. 

Westburg shouldn’t go anywhere. 

Until a larger trade is made clearing the logjam or an injury, my preference would be Mayo up, Kjerstad down as I think Mayo takes at bats away from worse players. 

The best and easiest way to clear the biggest logjam is to trade O'Hearn for a quality reliever or a prospect. It's a classic sell high move, and it's much easier to trade for a non-closer reliever than it is to trade for a starter. There are plenty of contending teams that need offensive help. And most importantly, it clears the DH slot for Kjerstad and Mayo. 

And Kjerstad shouldn't be sent down again. He's been mishandled enough by Elias and Hyde already, and he's a potential 40 HR bat with upside much higher than a few players who aren't part of the long-term future of this team and that he should already be taking at bats from, including Hays (even against LHP), Mullins (who's going to inevitably slump again and still has terrible offensive numbers despite a red hot 2+ weeks), and O'Hearn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I picture Scherzer as purely a salary dump for Texas. They are up against it in terms of Luxury tax. I also see Scherzer as a start to start pitcher in terms of durability. Not willing to give up more than a AAAA guy and a lottery ticket prospect. 
    • Meh.  Is it riskier to invest 1) in a phase 1 or phase 2 pharmaceutical or 2) when as the FDA is meeting for final approval?
    • I think of an elite athlete as something different entirely.  And I think that’s Frobby’s point.     I think of an elite athlete as someone that can easily & efficiently use their body to achieve an end goal.  Being able to manipulate their body and other implements to accomplish a specific task.  Be able to repeat that skill and adapt easily to changes in the environment.  Someone that has incredible balance, space awareness, timing, and hand eye coordination.  Someone who would thrive when thrown in any athletic environment they are put in.     To me it has nothing to do with speed, strength, or ability to jump. However, someone that is fast, jumps high, and is strong and who also can control their body et al would be the 1% elite elite.  IE. Gunnar (if you’ve seen him play other sports, he does it easily).   If I had to guess Mateo probably can’t shoot a basketball and would be a terrible ping pong player.  Just a guess watching him hit.     Not arguing or saying you are wrong, just how I define it. 
    • Who underrates Rooker? He's been mentioned in a bunch of trades. It's hard to underrate a guy averaging 141 OPS+ and an .849 OPS over the only two full seasons he's played. Oh, and the 30 HRs a year. 
    • I don't think he's going to be a star, but I think he will be a good player.  I wouldn't trade him now because I like his ability to play CF.    I would, however, not object to trading him in the right deal.  I don't think Crochet is that deal.   
    • This trade idea makes absolutely no sense unless you have the White Sox throw in Robert as well (and he won't be a throw-in, we'd have to up our package for him.)  Cowser's essentially been a full time starter and despite his bad May and mediocre June he's been an above average player for us overall.  The only way I'd consider giving up Cowser here is if they throw in Robert.  We'd probably have to package Cowser with someone better - instead of Norby we'd be looking at giving up Kjerstad or someone like that - if we wanted the WS to throw in Robert.   On top of that, Crochet is going to be of limited help this year.  We could save him for the playoffs, but that carries its own risks as well.  It's ok to look to the future, but we need to be maximizing the 2024 team's chance to win in the playoffs.  Trading a starting outfielder who's been well above average to date doesn't really do that.  Even if you assume the June version is more like his true talent level offensively, he's still likely to produce 1 to 1.5 WAR for the rest of the season just on the strength of his defense.  I'm not sure we get that from a limited Crochet + Cowser's backfill.
    • The timing matters here.  In the offseason we didn't know Cowser would become what he has defensively now, including being able to more than adequately handle CF.  Nor did we know Mullins was going to crater offensively to the extent he has. If you do this trade now, you are creating a hole in CF while only arguably upgrading the pitching for the rest of the season given Crochet's innings limitations.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...