Jump to content

2024 2nd Round Pick (#61): Ethan Anderson - C - (Jr) Virginia (VA)


Recommended Posts

Elias must see something in his catching tools. I do not think you take him unless you believe he can become average defender. Looks like a player who needs to catch 3 years minimum in the minors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HowAboutThat said:

Why didn’t we take Brecht?

He's a pitcher.  We don't take those.  It's fine.  Dave is going to pay for Burnes, Eovaldi, Snell, Fried, Scherzer and Cole (opt-out) this off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do really seem to factor in makeup quite a bit in their drafts. For better or worse.

If he could be a good switch hitting 1B with some pop and maybe a high average, that could be interesting. Especially given how weak 1B is in the game right now. 

I'm stretching, admittedly.

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UVA bringing the Gunnar and Adley replacements!     This is definitely going to motivate them to sign tomorrow's everyday offer.

The 25% of Elias' high school class from TJ Tech that went to UVA is probably like "Yeah, bro, finally!".

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I was fine with the first two picks but this one is a head scratcher.

 

 

Ha.  And I like this one better than O’Ferrall.  Anderson put up big numbers is sophomore year.  Walks more than he strikes out.  Switch hits.  Caught in HS and caught 26 games this year.   A switch hitter catcher who can hit?   Maybe.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

 

I understand that you are just sharing this, but every team is going to say this about the players they draft. I was listening to a draft podcast where the Guardians guy was saying how much they care about make up and being certain that they are drafting first class people. Nobody is going to say we got three guys that have some skills and are jerks on and off the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sydnor said:

I understand that you are just sharing this, but every team is going to say this about the players they draft. I was listening to a draft podcast where the Guardians guy was saying how much they care about make up and being certain that they are drafting first class people. Nobody is going to say we got three guys that have some skills and are jerks on and off the field.

Dan Duquette would have described them in such a way that you would have wondered if they were automatons or human beings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anderson and O’Ferrall feel like classic analytics picks. College hitters. Up the middle defensive positions. Great contact/plate discipline. You plug them into a model based on their stats and I’m sure they get high grades. For a team like the Orioles this feels like hitting a tee shot straight down the fairway.

They went with a riskier round 1 pick, chasing upside, and very much specific to the Orioles’ player development wheelhouse in that they clearly think they excel at fixing/covering up bad hit tools and pitch selection with their development methods. So they played it safer with their next two picks. 

I would have been happy with Brecht with either of the top 2 picks. They need to start spending more draft capital on pitchers. But I like the gamble on Honeycutt, and I can see enough upside on the O’Ferall and Anderson picks to not get too worked up on them. Yet. The ceilings are still high enough. But that’s only true if they go heavy on pitching on day 2 now. They can’t afford more model-driven college hitters as their upsides get lower and lower as the draft gets watered down further. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Ha.  And I like this one better than O’Ferrall.  Anderson put up big numbers is sophomore year.  Walks more than he strikes out.  Switch hits.  Caught in HS and caught 26 games this year.   A switch hitter catcher who can hit?   Maybe.

I can't work up myself up over a second round pick but I see this and I wonder a bit.

8 hours ago, Sovaosfan said:

Have know Ethan since 8th grade, he committed to Uva when he was 13. He has been switch hitting all his life, don't really see the fit because he is definently a hit first catcher that is not super athletic. Great kid super excited he is in our organization but come on Elias we need some pitching.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Mateo, Westburg, Wells, Means, Bradish, Grod, Webb, Colombe, Mountain .......... However this year turns out, it will be cast to me as the one year in 70 that I have listened to/watched Oriole baseball and EVER seen these many losses of top players to injuries during the same season for significant times. IF, we still make the playoffs and go beyond, IMO Hyde should be named Manager of The Year For Life - not just for 2023. I may have orange-colored glasses on or whatever you want to call me, but that is why I refuse to peck on him one game at a time. 
    • The whole idea that somewhere there are teams with “consistent” offenses that average 5 runs a game and never score below 4 is a fantasy.  Here are the top 5 offenses in baseball in runs per game, and how often they have scored 5+, 4, 3, 2, 1 and 0 runs. AZD (5.23): 65-16-14-11-14-4 NYY (5.10): 63-19-13-16-6-7 BAL (5.05): 60-20-15-15-10-4 BOS (5.02): 64-16-9-12-16-5 LAD (4.93): 60-23-15-10-11-5 There’s really nothing to choose from there in terms of consistency.   
    • Yeah it was pointed out back in the spring that the lack of optionable guys was going to be a tough thing to maneuver. That, and lack of talent.
    • Yea it doesn’t make sense. You traded for the guy for that specific reason and then you don’t use him.
    • I try not to vent about managerial decisions because some work, some don’t. And I think Hyde gets a lot of unwarranted criticism here sometimes. but letting Mullins hit in a 2 run game in the 7th with no outs and a man on base already was awful. It was a guaranteed out, best case scenario was he walks or maybe advances the runner with a weak grounder. The more likely scenario is he strikes out or pops out which of course he did. It also went against how Hyde has managed R/L matchups all year. As we all know he’s quick to make that change with guys even earlier than the 7th. We really botched that one.
    • Well he has 28Ks in his last 28 innings. I mean even after an 8 ER 4 inning performance he’s a 3.10 ERA pitcher.  His previous start was a 6 IP 3 ER outing. It’s easy to bundle a SSS 3 start stint. But if you extend that to 5 he has 3 QS out of 5.
    • His stuff was noticeably better than his previous stint, particularly innings 1-4.  Fastball was 93-94 v 91-92mph later in the outing which was same as prior avgs.  Curve and sweeper were sharper and more competitive/throw. For strikes&swings.  If Povich can hold the better stuff, he can be an asset in the rotation going forward. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...