Jump to content

Could the Angels be after Tejada again?


JakeeO

Recommended Posts

Does anybody know how much the Angels value Wood over Kendrick, or do they actually value Kendrick over Wood?

Personally, I would actually prefer Kendrick to Wood. Since Kendrick was a shortstop in high school, I believe he could make the transition.

Kendrick

Santana or Weaver

Kotchman

Jose Arredonde

for

Tejada

Javy

Obviously, this is looking at the situation in a way that the Angels are the desperate team instead of us being forced into trading Tejada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Santana,Aybar,Kendrick and Saunders for Miggy is the ideal imho. Aybar is 22 and doing very well at AAA offensively and he is supposed to be a defensive whiz. Kendrick is playing some 1base in the majors and Saunders is ML ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, i posted this idea on an Angels board just to get feedback from their fans.

Only a few responses so far but i have gotten a "never will happen" and a i doubt they trade Weaver and that OCab has been very good this year(770 OPS, 33 rbi's) and that the offensive difference is not enough of a difference to trade all that talent for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting Angels news here:

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/

Says Moreno craves Manny or Tejada and has Ok'd Stoneman to up salary.

Very interesting.

This begs the question....would Tejada move to 3B to play for the Angels? If they are happy with Cabrera at SS, would they consider doing this? Maybe they let Tejada DH and practice at 3B until he's ready.

If its quite obvious to those on this board, it has to be obvious to scouts that Tejada can't play SS the way he used to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tejada would have to be willing to go to third because remember, if they piss him off, he could just request a trade this coming offseason.

Now, maybe they keep Cabrera or even move him to second for the rest of the season and then move Tejada ot third in the offseason?

Now sure and really, don't care...LOL

If we get the deal done, i don;t care of Tejada is pissed and is dealt to Siberia in the offseason...Not our problem anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some feedback i am getting from Angels fans(albeit it is only like 4-6 guys):

1) No need for Tejada...OCab doing well and have Wood and Aybar.

2) No need for Javy..Guess they believe in Napoli?

3) Fans out in SoCal wish they had done the Manny for Wood/Kendrick/Shields/Figgins deal but some are also glad the way Stoneman holds onto players.

4) Seem to prefer going after MCab(can't blame them but is he available?) or someone like Crawford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job SG. Seeing how the other side thinks is good perspective.

Yea it is...Of course, much like i am sure we would, they think Wood, Kotchman and Weaver or Santana for Tejada and Lopez is way too much.

I think they are kidding themselves there but i can understand why they wouldn't want to make the trade as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since we're talking Tejada here, I just read an interesting tidbit on one of the Cubs boards.

According to a Cubs' inside source, Prior + Cedeno + Patterson for Tejada + Bedard was indeed on the table this past winter, and as was widely speculated/reported, Bedard was the sticking point.

The interesting twist: the O's were going to trade Prior for Teixeria....a deal that was supposedly agreed on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea it is...Of course, much like i am sure we would, they think Wood, Kotchman and Weaver or Santana for Tejada and Lopez is way too much.

I think they are kidding themselves there but i can understand why they wouldn't want to make the trade as well.

FWIW, I've all along thought the Weaver/Santana part pushed the deal into "too much" territory.

Tejada + JLopez for Wood + Kotchman + a salary dump (OCab, Jeff Weaver, or Erstad).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wood, Kotchman, Weaver/Santana = ???? in terms of O's prospects.

Reimold, Markakis, Penn/Cabrera? I'd say that's pretty comparable.

That's a pretty big package, although the Angels can afford it a lot more than us and it makes more sense for them to do that type of move.

Wood >> Reimold

Kotchman ~= Markakis

Weaver > Penn

============

Angels >> Orioles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I've all along thought the Weaver/Santana part pushed the deal into "too much" territory.

Tejada + JLopez for Wood + Kotchman + a salary dump (OCab, Jeff Weaver, or Erstad).

Jeff Weaver wouldn't really be a salary dump considering he is only signed for this year. No need to really take Orlando when you are also taking Wood. Erstad really has no use either.

Only way I'm trading with the Angels is for Santana and Wood. If they want to trade Kotchman or McPherson and take Javy also that is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I've all along thought the Weaver/Santana part pushed the deal into "too much" territory.

Tejada + JLopez for Wood + Kotchman + a salary dump (OCab, Jeff Weaver, or Erstad).

To be honest, i would likely agree with this although that would change if Javy Lopez starts to hit very well.

I mean, Wood is still just a prospect who has played very well in AA this year but has definitely taken a step back from last year. Kotchman has always dealt with injury problems and we just don't know enough about the pitchers yet.

We do know how great Tejada is.

But again, i can see how adding in the pitcher would cause an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wood >> Reimold

Kotchman ~= Markakis

Weaver > Penn

============

Angels >> Orioles

Weaver is further along than Penn but i am not sure he is the better prospect when you consider age and experience.

Wood is definitely ahead of Reimold but Reimold could easily eclipse him HOWEVER, it is unlikely he will be as valuable as Wood if Wood stays at SS.

Markakis is more valuable right now than Casey because he is younger and has not had all the injury issues. However, a healthy Kotchman is likely the same as Markakis, as you said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • This guy pitched three no-hit innings against the O's back in April.
    • O'Hearn blatantly disregards the need to run up the starter's pitch count and lines a base hit on the first pitch.
    • I absolutely would not pay a price that includes Mayo and Basallo. Where are the instances recently as it relates to trades where a team gave up two top 15ish position player prospects for any pitcher? I bet they are very rare, and even less rare with pitcher injury rates being what they are. I get that the Tigers can play hard ball and don't "have" to trade Skubal. But I also know that is a risk for them in that he could get hurt and then have no trade value between no and next deadline. IMO the Tigers are not going anywhere with or without Skubal for the next few seasons. They simply don't have the position player talent/offense to be a serious contender. And there best prospects (while admittedly very good) are all in single A. That's why I don't think that Kjerstad holds much appeal for them. Because he doesn't really match their competitive timeline. I don't think any team would pay that kind of price for Skubal. IMO only the Phillies are in a position to offer that sort of package. Maybe Seattle? But neither of those teams need pitching. The Phillies are absolutely loaded as is in the pitching department. And Seattle does have enough offense to seriously challenge. Having said all that, I would certainly seriously consider surrendering one of Mayo/Basallo. But it would have to be in a type of deal like this where I get back a difference making starter who is cost controlled for more than one year. And yes to McDermott (absolutely). Now DeLeon is interesting in that he may have some serious upside. But if you believe in your International/Dominican academy/program, then you have to trust that you can find/farm more young/high upside arms like him.
    • Santander gets his first Coliseum homer in his last game there, wrapping one around the foul pole.  
    • I started yesterdays and that didn’t go well.  
    • Nobody’s started this?     For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Adley Rutschman C Anthony Santander RF Ryan O’Hearn 1B Jordan Westburg 2B Heston Kjerstad LF Ryan Mountcastle DH Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Grayson Rodriguez RHP For the Athletics JJ Bleday CF Miguel Andujar LF Brent Rooker DH Tyler Soderstrom 1B Shea Langeliers C Zack Gelof 2B Lawrence Butler RF Brett Harris 3B Max Schuemann SS Mitch Spence RHP
    • I think those two would be fine in order to get us through the regular season. My concern recently is at least one time through the rotation the last 4 times, we have had at least one blow up start thus taxing our bullpen. Those two would be fine in order to provide a much higher floor than some of our last three starters. However, I don't really think either does that much for us when the leaves change and the calender turns to October. If we are in an elimination game and either is on the mound against one of Seattle's starters, I think they would have the advantage. (Not that Seattle is a shoo-in for the playoffs.) But Philly and the Dodgers are most likely to get to the Series (which of course is no guarantee). And if we were to face either one, I don't like our chances against their top 3 with Fedde and/or Severino on the mound. Plus, I think we need protection at the top of the rotation in the instance that Burnes is to leave after this season. I'm not sure Grayson plus the rest of the non-Burnes guys that we have is even a rotation that qualifies for a playoff birth let alone wins a World Series. A lot of posters are clinging to our the stat that points to our team ERA being 5th in MLB. But if you like at how much it spiked in June and how high it is so far in July, it is clear that it is really going in the wrong direction.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...