Jump to content

Sidney Ponson named Worst Pitcher of the Decade


beaner

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He might not have been the worst, statistically. But when you factor in all the potential he had, his immaturity, and the sheer idiocy of his actions and transgressions, I'd almost wish he had been.

What a complete and utter waste of talent this guy was. Years will pass and I still won't be able to erase the memory of Sidney Ponson as an Oriole and all the time wasted on hoping he'd ever get his head out of his :old5fan:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This saddens me as I've always wanted to see Big Sid succeed. :( The more I think about it, the more I disagree with it. Carl Pavano, Jose Lima and Mike Hampton (all mentioned in the article) would get it way from Sidney would. Pavano pitched to three batters as a Yankee in four years and doesn't get the nod? It's Lima Time! Beleve it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This saddens me as I've always wanted to see Big Sid succeed. :( The more I think about it, the more I disagree with it. Carl Pavano, Jose Lima and Mike Hampton (all mentioned in the article) would get it way from Sidney would. Pavano pitched to three batters as a Yankee in four years and doesn't get the nod? It's Lima Time! Beleve it!

But have you seen Jose Lima's wife? And Pavano was with Alyssa Milano. What did Syd ever do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From 2000 to 2009, Mike Hampton made $121 million! During that time he was -

78-72

4.59 ERA (100 ERA+)

201 games started (means he made $600k per start!)

1.505 WHIP

So he was average on a HUGE contract. I wouldn't say he was the worst pitcher of the decade though. Plus those numbers are inflated some from Coors. Just an average pitcher on a bad contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CaBBrera >>> Ponson, but not by much.

Oh, come on Moose...

Sidney had it all:

  • High potential
  • Low achievement
  • Poor judgment
  • Hopeless immaturity
  • Crappy behavior

DCab had just the first 2 of these, but he wasn't a bad guy, he was a good guy.

In contrast, Sidney was the complete package: he was a 5-tool loser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think we’ve all noticed that more calls have gone against the O’s than for them in the last few years.  It was only the Alomar part of your thesis that made me shake my head.   
    • But when that LHB is a Ced in a terrible slump, does that really matter?  Anyone could have done what he did, regardless of handedness, time in league or past track record.   Letting him try to hit was a bad decision.
    • I will be surprised if Baumann gets claimed.  I think he will be in AAA and that was part of the calculus for the move. 
    • Glad I'm not imagining things in regard to it being worse for us in recent years.  I don't recall thinking the umpiring was this bad, say, 10 years ago...but then again, there also didn't seem to be a better solution on the horizon. MLB should want robot umps for a few reasons...first, they should want accurate strike calls, that's just obvious.  Two, it's not a secret that MLB wants offense and they've been looking for ways to create offense ever since they stopped looking the other way on PEDs in the late 90s, early 2000s.   I have to believe that if pitchers aren't getting calls on pitches that are off the strike zone that a few things will happen; walks will increase because a pitcher won't be able to try to paint a corner too often.  They'll run the risk of throwing more balls, and as a result they'll put more over the plate for hitters to swing at.  Batters can feel more confident about taking a ball off the plate because they won't be afraid that an umpire will call it a strike. More pitches in the zone,  more swings, perhaps more offense, MLB should want that....maybe that's just really simplistic thinking but it seems fairly logical to me.  I also can't believe MLB wants the bat taken out of a superstar's hands in a crucial moment because an umpire missed a strike call or two, that's just not good for the game.  You've gotta wonder what the outcomes of some games would be if pitchers aren't getting strike calls because the umpiring is so awful. Unfortunately, it's not as easy as getting rid of the umpires and installing the robots.  The umpires are unionized, they'll strike, whatever.  I wouldn't blame them for doing that, either.   But something's gotta give.  It's my hope that by 2030 there's a solution to this issue and that there's a defined strike zone for batters and that umpires can still have a place in the game, even if it's not as much from behind home plate calling balls and strikes.  
    • Mullins has options, for what it's worth. I doubt they would send Cedric down, but Johnson could take Stowers' spot and move Cedric to more of a bench role.
    • Big night.  I did see something funny.  He tried to throw someone out at the plate from fairly shallow RF and air mailed it into the stands.  Never seen that before.  I assume there is some type of screen he would have had to clear to do it.
    • That's a number that college football players at skill positions can hit regularly so I can buy it.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...