Jump to content

Would you trade Guthrie for Colby Rasmus?


Roll Tide

Guthrie for Rasmus  

177 members have voted

  1. 1. Guthrie for Rasmus

    • Yes ... Sign me up!
    • No .... I am keeping Guts in my dead cold hand!
    • Yes , But I'd need more from the Cards
    • Yes , But I'd suspect the Cards would want more!


Recommended Posts

Colby Rasmus is a top flight talent. He'll translate.

The issue is two-fold. #1. We really are not offering nearly enough. I'd offer Jones and see if they take it, but anything less is probably a pipe dream. You don't get Rasmus for Guthrie and bullpen help. You better throw in at least one really nice prospect, and Bundy isn't going anywhere.

#2. Rasmus isn't happy in St. Louis. What makes anyone think he'd be happy with the O's? His dad wants him in NY eventually. I'm not seeing a scenario where we suddenly become a franchise that he really values playing for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

.

So how is Guthrie doing with his new team ? Oh yeah .......... he's still on the Orioles.

I think that the power of suggestion from the numerous "Would you trade Guthrie?" threads is affecting my psyche.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine, pick whatever adjective you would like. Your objection is pointless.

Not really..the point is just flying over your head.

You are offering too much in that deal, which is the point.

I like Rasmus a lot but to trade them Guthrie(who could fetch 1-2 very good prospects himself), JJ(who could also fetch a decent package) and 2 very good prospects is way too much to give up for Rasmus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really..the point is just flying over your head.

You are offering too much in that deal, which is the point.

I like Rasmus a lot but to trade them Guthrie(who could fetch 1-2 very good prospects himself), JJ(who could also fetch a decent package) and 2 very good prospects is way too much to give up for Rasmus.

Internet slap-fight aside, I think you're underestimating Rasmus' value. As I said earlier, this is like the Upton trade threads from last year. Or the Wright trade threads from this year. Or Billy Butler.

If we could get Rasmus for the package Stoner listed, I'd absolutely pull the trigger. I don't think the Cards would, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Internet slap-fight aside, I think you're underestimating Rasmus' value. As I said earlier, this is like the Upton trade threads from last year. Or the Wright trade threads from this year. Or Billy Butler.

If we could get Rasmus for the package Stoner listed, I'd absolutely pull the trigger. I don't think the Cards would, though.

The reason the deal is too high a price to pay is that I believe you only get three years of Rasmus. Upton was already extended at a very reasonable rate. Rasmus isn't going to fetch a package -- if he goes at all it will be in a 1-1, 1-2 or 2-2, I'd imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Mets pick-up a huge chunk of the Beltran contract, they could move him to STL for Rasmus. Rays could move Shields and probably get Rasmus +1. Rays could also look to move Upton so someplace like San Francisco to clear up future payroll -- Desmond Jennigns is ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ohh, I guess I was confused since the link Hank provided showed 5 suggested packages for Rasmus each with value at least equal to what I said.

I didn't even read the link...Because it doesn't matter.(i didn't see it either)

The reason the package is too much is because we are trading 2 pieces that can bring back several more pieces plus 2 very good pieces of our own.

That's the problem with the package. I would love to add Rasmus but this team has more holes than just one player, especially a player that isn't as good as he should be and its hard to imagine that Baltimore is the change of scenery he needs.

Obviously you make the deal for Guthrie and I am ok with including JJ in the deal but adding 2 very good prospects becomes way too much and makes little sense for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dierkes is on MLB Traderumors Live Chat ... He had this to say

2:21 Comment From Ace

Is there anyone (besides Pence) that doesn't appear to be getting shopped, but you think SHOULD be?

2:21 Jeremy Guthrie comes to mind. He seems near peak value to me.

He thinks Guthrie value is at its peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also this was posted on another site....

Starter Jeremy Guthrie has been a player that many teams want to help their playoff pushes. The Boston Red Sox in particular is the one team that has expressed major interest in Guthrie. Though they have arguably the best starting three pitchers in the AL (Beckett, Lester, and Buchholtz), Guthrie could help revive a struggling back end of their rotation that includes John Lackey and Andrew Miller. He is 3-12 with a 4.18 ERA and a 1.33 WHIP. Hopefully the O's can get some solid young starters in return for this 32 year old veteran

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debating this is pointless as he is apparently not even available, but the O's would be crazy to turn down Rasmus for Guthrie, Johnson, and those two quality arms.

If I'm St. Louis though, there is no way I'd accept that.

The hell? I would not do that trade at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops. I voted for option 1 but did not see option 4. Highly doubt the Cards do this, though if they are intent on grabbing a pitcher and the market is limited I could see them thinking about a deal centered around Guthrie and JJ.

If you could ship Guthrie+ for Rasmus and move Adam Jones for a bigger, younger haul, you'd have yourself quite a net gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debating this is pointless as he is apparently not even available, but the O's would be crazy to turn down Rasmus for Guthrie, Johnson, and those two quality arms.

If I'm St. Louis though, there is no way I'd accept that.

Guthrie, Johnson, Bridwell, and Bundy for Rasmus? Chris, you really think they'd turn that down? There is no way in hell they turn that down, and we'd be getting fleeced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...