Jump to content

Save Mark Reynolds


Save-reynolds

Recommended Posts

I like Reynolds. I think our IF defense will suffer from Davis or someone else at 1B. I think Reynolds played most of the season with an oblique and then the arm injury, and his power numbers suffered from it. He still saw a lot of pitches and upped his OBP while lowering his K %. His career average numbers are better than anything we can get on the FA market and to trade for someone better, will cost a lot in talent we need to hold on to. I think the O's will negotiate a two year deal at a reasonable cost, say 2/16 M. If he puts up a career average year with good defense he will be well worth it IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I like Reynolds. I think our IF defense will suffer from Davis or someone else at 1B. I think Reynolds played most of the season with an oblique and then the arm injury, and his power numbers suffered from it. He still saw a lot of pitches and upped his OBP while lowering his K %. His career average numbers are better than anything we can get on the FA market and to trade for someone better, will cost a lot in talent we need to hold on to. I think the O's will negotiate a two year deal at a reasonable cost, say 2/16 M. If he puts up a career average year with good defense he will be well worth it IMO.

Very well reasoned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a solid core in place the team doesn't really have a lot of open positions to fix the problems with the lineup. Unless Chris Davis gets traded, you have 1b and dh to work with.

If you keep Markakis leading off you need a 2 hole hitter who can get on base. I'd also like to see another middle of the order hitter to take some pressure off of Jones, and be able to move Wieters down the lineup.

How we fill those needs will determine whether Reynolds is brought back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very simply, if the O's non-tender Reynolds they need to fill his spot with someone better. "Not as good, but cheaper" won't cut it with me. Nor will "may be as good". I like the Sherriff and I'm not interested in replacing him unless it's a clear improvement.

This is perfectly said and is my thinking as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hard part with this off season is it seems almost everyone knows we have to improve but then when i see talk on here it seems people are like we should keep McLouth/Reimold in LF, Davis to DH, and i don't think that they do anything at second base. I am fine with going into next season with LF/Dh positions filled with a combination of Nate/Chris/Nolan/and Hoes. So 1st is the place that seems logical to improve yet many people want to keep Reynolds, so it makes it hard to keep him and also improve the team imo. Then you look at the free agents and say well Mark is as good or better then the other choices. So unless we make a trade i think it hurts the team more to loose him and add a free agent compared to keeping him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a one year deal plus club option for Youkilis?

He's clutch, he is a terrific fielder.

He doesn't whiff or GIDP much.

He is even a strong backup plan at 3rd if Manny doesn't cut it, he can hit in the middle of the order, he is a winner, and he hates the Yankees and has something to prove to the Red Sox.

He will come cheap after his injury prone years.

And even in his crappiest season, he was better than Reynolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with what a lot of posters have said so far, I'm on board with Marky Mark. I mean we knew what we were getting when we traded for him, a guy who strikes out a ton but can also hit moon shot bombs. We thought he was a solid defensive player, he still is although he has changed corners of the diamond. He had a bit of an off year this year, although still hit some very crucial homers, I think he deserves another shot. I'm a big fan and am definitely on board to re-sign him.

He's one of those players that you can just tell if he goes somewhere else he's going to have a big year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with what a lot of posters have said so far, I'm on board with Marky Mark. I mean we knew what we were getting when we traded for him, a guy who strikes out a ton but can also hit moon shot bombs. We thought he was a solid defensive player, he still is although he has changed corners of the diamond. He had a bit of an off year this year, although still hit some very crucial homers, I think he deserves another shot. I'm a big fan and am definitely on board to re-sign him.

He's one of those players that you can just tell if he goes somewhere else he's going to have a big year.

yep. now that Reynolds knows where his strengths are (in 1b)...without injuries he could do some serious long-ball damage. I know Steve Melewski is a fan of Reynolds and I'm inclined to agree with him when he says that people need to not get so caught up with his strike out rate. I mean yeah, we would ALL love it if that were not an issue for him, but that's not what Mark is there for. It's his power and (now) his defense. If he has a healthy year with minimal injuries...especially knowing he would start the year at 1b? he's got my vote.

just my opinion..but I don't see a better option being realistic for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a one year deal plus club option for Youkilis?

He's clutch, he is a terrific fielder.

He doesn't whiff or GIDP much.

He is even a strong backup plan at 3rd if Manny doesn't cut it, he can hit in the middle of the order, he is a winner, and he hates the Yankees and has something to prove to the Red Sox.

He will come cheap after his injury prone years.

And even in his crappiest season, he was better than Reynolds.

You have to figure out a way to deal Betemit if you decide to go with Youkilis. Youk would be able to get plenty of playing time, even if Reynolds is retained. He and Chris Davis would be a disgustingly good platoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a one year deal plus club option for Youkilis?

He's clutch, he is a terrific fielder.

He doesn't whiff or GIDP much.

He is even a strong backup plan at 3rd if Manny doesn't cut it, he can hit in the middle of the order, he is a winner, and he hates the Yankees and has something to prove to the Red Sox.

He will come cheap after his injury prone years.

And even in his crappiest season, he was better than Reynolds.

An old expensive injury prone declining Youkilis over a just-hitting-his-prime Reynolds?

Nooooooooo thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very simply, if the O's non-tender Reynolds they need to fill his spot with someone better. "Not as good, but cheaper" won't cut it with me. Nor will "may be as good". I like the Sherriff and I'm not interested in replacing him unless it's a clear improvement.

:agree:

If Double D thinks he's worth 7.5 but Mark wants 9, well then I think you gotta bite the bullet and go up to 9, unless there is some great first baseman available that we are all overlooking.

I'm tired of constantly looking for a first baseman year after year, and judging by Davis' work over there early last year, he certainly is not the answer. I would offer Reynolds 2/16 and see if he takes it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:agree:

If Double D thinks he's worth 7.5 but Mark wants 9, well then I think you gotta bite the bullet and go up to 9, unless there is some great first baseman available that we are all overlooking.

I'm tired of constantly looking for a first baseman year after year, and judging by Davis' work over there early last year, he certainly is not the answer. I would offer Reynolds 2/16 and see if he takes it.

Davis is making a lot less than 9 M,and while not as good a 1B the difference wouldn't be worth the 6-7 M in salaries.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...