Jump to content

What kind of punishment are you expecting for Hammel?


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

LOL If Hammel had had the control to hit him in the shoulder/head area intententionally with a slider he wouldn't be in the position where his intentions were in question

THIS! If Jason had that much control of his 3 he would have thrown it low and away for a STRIKE!

Hunter Wendlestadt is the idiot! :angryfire: He's NOT commanded by MLB to throw Jason out there. He has to stay in the game and realize what happened. Not showboat it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-on-baseball/22338595/jason-hammel-gives-up-three-straight-homers-plunks-next-guy-gets-tossed

This article explains it well.

"My own conspiracy theory is that pitchers do this -- "this" being go to the off-speed stuff -- precisely for purposes of plausible deniability. After all, Hammel's slider checks in at 84.5 miles per hour, which means it's fully capable of leaving a mark."

You can get your frustration out of your system while also being able to deny you meant to hit him. Throwing a fastball is basically admitting you're trying to hurt the guy and asking for a suspension.

It was a BACKUP slider. If pitchers could throw backup sliders on purpose, they would do it all the time since it's pretty much impossible to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a BACKUP slider. If pitchers could throw backup sliders on purpose, they would do it all the time since it's pretty much impossible to hit.

Yeah when it hits you in the head it is a quite hard to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Leyland on Hammel: "In my heart, I do not think he was throwing at him.' <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23orioles">#orioles</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tigers">#tigers</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">June 2, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody can go into Hammels mind and tell if its intentional or not for sure. You have to go by the situation... and hitting a guy in the head with the first pitch after 3 straight homers is considered head hunting, and isn't considered acceptable by Major League Baseball. Hammel just saying "It was an accident" or "I didn't mean to hit him" doesn't mean anything to MLB.

I don't buy the slider meaning it was totally unintentional, either. You can get your message across with an 82 mph pitch while also using that as an excuse why you weren't throwing at the guy.

You sound like a displaced Detroit Tigers fan. Logic should tell you that if he was pissed and wanted to drill someone it would have been with a fastball. It's usually much more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even considering his wildness, lets say its a 5% chance he hits a guy in that area given his command today. Thats still a 95% chance it was intentional. You talk about holes in my argument... how do you respond to there being very very little chance of actually hitting a guy in that situation by accident?

Its possible it was unintentional. But its also much more likely it wasn't.

Your attempts at quantifying this are completely erroneous.

Okay, so let's start with your 5% figure. With an erratic Hammel, on a righty-to-righty match-up, a slider that slips has a chance (as you say) of 5% of hitting someone in the head. That means the other 95% of the time, a slider that slips could land anywhere BUT the head.

I think the point you are trying to make is that pitches don't normally end up near the head, therefore given the context of the situation, Hammel had to have intentionally thrown at the head. But when you consider the pitch used (82 mph slider), total lack of command, and prior history, then it becomes very hard to argue your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your attempts at quantifying this are completely erroneous.

Okay, so let's start with your 5% figure. With an erratic Hammel, on a righty-to-righty match-up, a slider that slips has a chance (as you say) of 5% of hitting someone in the head. That means the other 95% of the time, a slider that slips could land anywhere BUT the head.

I think the point you are trying to make is that pitches don't normally end up near the head, therefore given the context of the situation, Hammel had to have intentionally thrown at the head. But when you consider the pitch used (82 mph slider), total lack of command, and prior history, then it becomes very hard to argue your point.

So then, you think over a 50% chance of the time he throws that pitch in that situation, he'll hit the guy up near his head? Thats the only kind of argument you can make it for it being a better chance it was unintentional.... and if thats true, then why is he throwing a pitch that'll likely hit the guy in the first place if he doesn't want to hit him?

Plus, Hammel knows as well as anyone that if you hit a guy in a situation like that, you're going to be ejected. Why throw anything inside for the first pitch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, this is just simple logic, people. If Hammel can't hit his spots, therefore giving up three gofer balls in a row, how the hell do you think he can suddenly gain enough control to actually throw at someone's head? It's the Ricky Vaughn argument. Walked the bases loaded on 12 straight pitches, gives up a grooved ball granny, then the next one plunks the batter and he's tossed. Like he suddenly gained control for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...