Jump to content

Greivis Vasquez killed us today


Recommended Posts

You're basically saying what I'm saying - but processing it differently.
You seem to be forgiving him for even taking the shot, calling it a mechanical/fundamental flaw, rather than a poor decision.

Everytime he shoots a 3 like that, I consider it a turnover, which bumps his total up to about 20 for the last 2 games. Poor decision making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You seem to be forgiving him for even taking the shot, calling it a mechanical/fundamental flaw, rather than a poor decision.

Everytime he shoots a 3 like that, I consider it a turnover, which bumps his total up to about 20 for the last 2 games. Poor decision making.

It's a matter of semantics. We're saying the same thing differently. I call it a fundamental problem when you take an unforced off-balance shot, and you call it a poor decision. Whichever way we call it, we see the same problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a matter of semantics. We're saying the same thing differently. I call it a fundamental problem when you take an unforced off-balance shot, and you call it a poor decision. Whichever way we call it, we see the same problem.
I don't think its a semantical argument. I think a fundamental problem is a very different thing than poor decision-making.

A poor decision means playing stupidly. It means doing things that you know, or should know, are poor basketball moves. Its hoisting up a 3 with 29 seconds on the shot clock with a 5 point lead and a minute to play. Its attacking the basket on a fast break when you are outnumbered 3-1.

A fundamental problem is having bad form on your jumpshot. Not being able to finish with your off hand. Being a poor free throw shooter. Not knowing how to box out. Reaching constantly on defense.

Vasquez isn't shooting these off-balanced 3-pointers because he has a problem with understanding the fundamentals of good shooting form. He's doing them because he's not playing intelligently when he is capable of doing so. Its poor decision making, not poor mechanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its a semantical argument. I think a fundamental problem is a very different thing than poor decision-making.

A poor decision means playing stupidly. It means doing things that you know, or should know, are poor basketball moves. Its hoisting up a 3 with 29 seconds on the shot clock with a 5 point lead and a minute to play. Its attacking the basket on a fast break when you are outnumbered 3-1.

A fundamental problem is having bad form on your jumpshot. Not being able to finish with your off hand. Being a poor free throw shooter. Not knowing how to box out. Reaching constantly on defense.

Vasquez isn't shooting these off-balanced 3-pointers because he has a problem with understanding the fundamentals of good shooting form. He's doing them because he's not playing intelligently when he is capable of doing so. Its poor decision making, not poor mechanics.

Truer words have never been spoken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I didn't think that was a homer off the bat.  I thought he got under it a little and that since it was going out to the Wall, there wasn't much of a chance -if any- that it was going to get out of the park. That's one of the more impressive things you'll ever see.  
    • The Orioles have to face two opponents every night:  the other team and the home plate umpire.    Tonight Thornton was able to retire Jordan Westburg without ever throwing a strike, because he got strike one called on a pitch 6 inches off the outside corner, got strike two on a phantom foul tip and forced Westburg to chase strike three.  Mullins and Rutschman were also put in the hole by terrible strike one calls in the ninth.  We are systematically disadvantaged on ball/strike calls.  My theory is that the umpires have had it in for the Orioles ever since Roberto Alomar spit on John Hirshbeck and Peter Angelos refused to discipline Alomar.   Maybe my explanation is wrong, but the fact is that the Orioles have one of the highest number of expected runs taken away from them by missed balls and strikes.   The robot umps can't come soon enough.  
    • The Orioles have to face two opponents every night:  the other team and the home plate umpire.    Tonight Thornton was able to retire Jordan Westburg without ever throwing a strike, because he got strike one called on a pitch 6 inches off the outside corner, got strike two on a phantom foul tip and forced Westburg to chase strike three.  Mullins and Rutschman were also put in the hole by terrible strike one calls in the ninth.  We are systematically disadvantaged on ball/strike calls.  My theory is that the umpires have had it in for the Orioles ever since Roberto Alomar spit on John Hirshbeck and Peter Angelos refused to discipline Alomar.   Maybe my explanation is wrong, but the fact is that the Orioles have one of the highest number of expected runs taken away from them by missed balls and strikes.   The robot umps can't come soon enough.  
    • Another good outing from the kid.  He’s pitching remarkable considering the run scoring environment in AAA.
    • Had a great spring, now hitting .271/.920 at Norfolk. Could he possibly be worse than Mullins? How much longer can we afford to carry Mullins producing zero offense? Any reports on the defense? When he came up with Cleveland he did not play CF but they had Myles Straw there. 
    • LHB have an .825 OPS against Munoz, RHB .247.
    • Cosign. Mateo is the better offensive player right now and Mullins is unplayable outside his defense. Cowser needs to start more in CF he looked ok the other day. Stowers did make ok contact pinch hitting for Mateo, but I would have preferred to see him or Mountcastle for Mullins to start the inning.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...