Jump to content

MLBTRADERUMORS Oriole Arbitration Notes


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/10/arbitration-eligibles-baltimore-orioles.html

Excerpt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/10/arbitration-eligibles-baltimore-orioles.html

Excerpt:

For clarification: I believe the number in parenthesis is service time, not current salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but now it's this offseason. I get that he had more value last offseason, but he was reasonably paid coming into this season. You must be for trading Chris Davis this year too, right?

No.

I don't have any long standing feelings on the interchangeability of first basemen and a severe disinclination to overpaying them.

I do however have a long track record of disliking the very concept of closers and expressing the viewpoint that since bullpen performance is very erratic that dedicating significant resources to the bullpen is inefficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

I don't have any long standing feelings on the interchangeability of first basemen and a severe disinclination to overpaying them.

I do however have a long track record of disliking the very concept of closers and expressing the viewpoint that since bullpen performance is very erratic that dedicating significant resources to the bullpen is inefficient.

Interchangeability and disinclination in one sentence. I'd like to invite you to Games Forum of OH. We have an ongoing Word Association I think you would enjoy.

Jim Johnson is not Chris Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. So even though you preferred moving Johnson last season, I would then assume that you would still look to trade him this offseason.
Very much yes. Matusz as well if his future looks to be a LOOGY.

I want to give Wright a look in the pen come ST.

Absolutely....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on all points. I doubt Wright gets consideration for the bullpen though, even though I suspect he winds up there eventually.

Even though I abhor the whole idea of designated roles in the BP, he'll never get the chance as long as they keep Johnson. That's why they need to make him an offer above what he made last year, sign him and then trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So given this estimate by mlbtraderumors of 41.2 million, and the 2014 current payroll obligations in COTS, this puts our team salary at 86.6. This clearly assumes no one is traded and these estimates are correct.

That probably means we have about $10 million to spend on free agents unless Petey is really willing to open the books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...