Jump to content

The Dominance of Oakland

25 Nuggets

Recommended Posts

This may be the best team Oakland has put together since 1990. I'm not joking. The team would have to sustain these numbers of course and there's no telling if they will or not... but approaching the 1/2 mark of the season they look absurdly good.

First off, run differential. Here's how the AL looks:

130 Oakland

35 Toronto

31 Los Angeles

29 Seattle

2 Detroit

-1 Baltimore

-6 Cleveland

-8 Kansas City

-11 Chicago

-16 Minnesota

-25 Boston

-28 New York

-37 Houston

-38 Texas

-52 Tampa

That's right, only five teams in the AL have a positive run differential and #2 is nearly 100 runs worse than Oakland (BTW notice the Orioles are 6th now).

Let's put it another way. Oakland is now 40-26 on the year for a very good .606 win%. But according to their run differential they're underperforming. Their Pythagorean W-L is a staggering 47-19 (.712)! That would project to 115 wins on the year. How do they do it?

Oakland has scored more runs through 66 games than anyone in baseball (336). They are the only team scoring over five runs a game. They're doing it the way you'd imagine: they're first in the AL in OBP, second in home runs and last in caught stealing. Oakland could easily send five starters to the All Star Game (C Derek Norris, 1B Brandon Moss, 3B Josh Donaldson, LF Yoenis Cespedes, CF Coco Crisp). So there's that.

But Oakland has also allowed less runs than anyone in baseball (206). Second place is a tie between two National League teams, Washington and Atlanta (223). Look at this list of runs allowed/game in the AL (day old):

1) Oakland 3.16

2) Seattle 3.64

3) Kansas City 4.12

...no need to continue. They're a run better than 3rd place. The AL average is 4.31 and only six teams are better because Oakland skews the numbers.

You can also put it this way: Oakland has a team ERA+ of 132. That's including ballpark and environment. The whole team. In fact there are only two pitchers -- Dan Straily and Jim Johnson -- with ANY playing time and an ERA+ under 100. They are first in wins, flat ERA, innings pitched, runs, earned runs, and home runs allowed and second in hits allowed. Their entire team has a H/9 of 7.5. How many pitchers on say, Baltimore can boast that? Four. For Oakland it's their team average.

Again I know things can change but I wanted to point out just how good the Athletics have been the first half of the season. As things stand, this is the best baseball team that Moneyball has ever produced.

Thanks to CBSSports and Baseball Reference for providing the stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can also put it this way: Oakland has a team ERA+ of 132. That's including ballpark and environment. The whole team. In fact there are only two pitchers -- Dan Straily and Jim Johnson -- with ANY playing time and an ERA+ under 100.

The recently deceased Bob Welch won the 1988 Cy Young award with an ERA+ of 125. Doug Drabek, Pete Vuckovich, LaMarr Hoyt... all Cy Young winners with ERA+es worse than Oakland's entire staff.

Also, the 1984 Tigers, who famously began the year 35-5, were 44-15 on June 12th. On that date they had a run differential of +112.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • You've just describes a perennial 5+ WAR player. I would like that as well
    • It’s fascinating to me how the opinions on Cowser vary so much.   He’s got three evaluations in the top 40 (including as high as 19) and two outside the top 100.   And listening to Longenhagen on Effectively Wild, Cowser wasn’t a borderline case for him, he was way outside the top 100.    Somebody’s going to be proven very wrong about Cowser, I just don’t know who yet.    
    • The Rosario deal is gonna be a savvy move by the Rays.
    • I don't think the Orioles do very much with the players they drafted in that first taste of pro ball, especially with the draft being so late now and players not really getting a lot of professional PAs that first season. I'm sure they evaluated him and have him working on things this offseason, so we'll get a better gauge of him as a player in that first full season. Some guys have games that allow them to be very successful at low levels but that won't translate to high levels of the minors or the major leagues.  Bradfield is a bit of a wildcard with a nice upside if he can drive the ball a little more. His elite eye at the plate is going allow him to have a very high OBP if he can show even the slightest bit of ability to do damage or the ability to fight off pitches until he gets that walk or gets a pitch he can put in play well. The range is already major league elite, but his arm is well below average from what I saw in a few throws so that will limit the "elite defense" angle, but he'll cover a heck of a lot with that speed. I'm looking forward to watching his progress this season because he's one of the bigger wildcards for me and I think that first full season will tell us a lot.
    • It will be interesting to watch Matt Blood's comments and what the swing plane looks like as the year gets going. To the extent all Bats are Ty Cobb or Babe Ruth, even in the cases of Norby and Cowser, whose DNA is I feel more Ty Cobb, challenging them to get to their power has been part of the game plan and wow are they not .300 hitters anymore. I think EBJ may be a mold breaker in this respect. In terms of what kind of line to guess at, I did enjoy learning recently Billy Hamilton was basically 250/300/350 in both his AAA and MLB rookie season.    I believe EBJ does have a little more juice than Hamilton did, but for starting out its a very easy yardstick.     Al Bumbry was just about .100 ISO during his career, working off being a .280 lifetime hitter. Last 10 Years, JBJ and Ender Inciarte are a couple other CF who have had the quiet ~3.5 fWAR kind of seasons with lots of Baserunning + Defensive value. Cowser and Kjerstad are probably safe from the 220/260/300 guy...the 250/305/360 guy could give them some problems.
    • This guy could be a good major league player. Odds are, he will not be. History shows that it is way to early to pencil him in to a future major league roster.
    • Have you ever tried telling your wife to go to the gym? I don’t advise it.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...