Jump to content

2015 HOF Candidates


Frobby

Recommended Posts

New candidates: Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez, John Smoltz

Return candidates: Craig Biggio, Mike Piazza, Jack Morris, Jeff Bagwell, Curt Schilling, Mike Mussina. Also Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa and others suspected of PED use.

I think Johnson and Martinez get in on the first ballot. Biggio might sneak in this year. That's about all.

Starting next year, there will be no great starting pitchers joining the list for several years. It will be interesting to see what happens with Smoltz, Schilling and Mussina in those years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was rumored but never proven. (Google Murray Chass, back acne)

All 3 first timers should make it. Biggio also. My guess is Piazza and Moose are shut out again as well as Schilling.

I don't think Smoltz is an obvious HOFer, as compared to Mussina and Schilling. I think all three of those guys have a good case, but not an overwhelming one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that he should be in the Hall then. Greatest offensive catcher of all time.

But a poor defensive catcher. I think Piazza deserves it but should hardly be an automatic.

Smoltz, otoh, should be first ballot, imo. Dominant as both a starter and closer. Rating the Atlanta aces, he was a bit behind Maddux and a bit ahead of Glavine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But a poor defensive catcher. I think Piazza deserves it but should hardly be an automatic.

Smoltz, otoh, should be first ballot, imo. Dominant as both a starter and closer. Rating the Atlanta aces, he was a bit behind Maddux and a bit ahead of Glavine.

Mussina: 270-153 (.638), 123 ERA+

Schilling: 216-146 (.597), 127 ERA+

Smoltz: 213-155 (.579), 125 ERA+ (209-149 (.584), 124 ERA+ as a starter; 4-6, 154 saves as a reliever)

I feel you're really splitting hairs among these three, if you are judging on regular season performance. Both Schilling 11-2, 2.23 ERA) and Smoltz (15-4, 2.67 ERA) pitched extremely well in the postseason, whereas Mussina was just his typical self for the most part and got a bit unlucky with his W-L (7-8, 3.42 ERA). I'd put all three in the HOF, eventually. For now they take a back seat to Randy Johnson and Pedro Martinez in 2015. Then you have three years where these guys are on the ballot and there are no new plausible pitcher candidates. Things get more complicated for the 2019 class, which includes Roy Halladay, Andy Pettitte and Mariano Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's a distinct possibility that four get in -- however, that was cloaked in the optimism of the class of 2014. My money is on Frobby's three: Johnson, Martinez and Biggio. Biggio because he was so close last year. Smoltz shows very well on his first ballot but can't quite wade through the crowd.

And by the way, that's a good thing, electing three. Last year was the most crowded ballot I've ever seen. The class of zero in 2013 is still fresh in the minds of the BBWAA and there are less members voting under the max of ten. I think last year had the highest average number of votes per ballot in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Smoltz is an obvious HOFer, as compared to Mussina and Schilling. I think all three of those guys have a good case, but not an overwhelming one.

Fair enough, not an overwhelming case -- but all three are obvious HOFers in my mind. They're all top 100 material; in other words, they're above median. Only HOF elitists would not consider them. I've debated a number of those types on the baseball history boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedro Martinez

Randy Johnson

Mike Piazza

Craig Biggio

Barry Bonds

Roger Clemens

John Smoltz

Mike Mussina

Curt Schilling

Jeff Bagwell

Tim Raines

ALL BELONG in the Hall of Fame. I don't believe in the players staying on the list, etc. Either a player is a Hall of Famer or not. The PED argument, notwithstanding, how do we know guys like Rickey Henderson, Andre Dawson, Jim Rice, even Nolan Ryan did not do steroids?

Yes I said Nolan Ryan. He is very close to Tom House who claimed to have use steroids in late 60's to early 70s and many of the players that played with him in Texas were linked not to mention a guy with the Angels and Rangers who could be a suspect, Brian Downing. I'm not saying they all did but if I can make you think and cast a little doubt then how is it implausible to think that many guys who are in the Hall-of-Fame had "some help". Heck during the Pittsburgh-Kansas City drug trials, it was reported that most of baseball was using cocaine recreationally. Do you really think they stopped there? Tim Raines included. He had a cocaine issue too. So did Paul Molitor, among many others.

I'm not talking about Sosa and McGwire and Palmeiro yet. Guys who had great careers that were Hall of Famers if PEDs weren't part of the occasion but in each of their cases, I'm not sure they would have been more than borderline without the help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Smoltz is an obvious HOFer, as compared to Mussina and Schilling. I think all three of those guys have a good case, but not an overwhelming one.
As much as some may protest, the HOF is still mainly about the counting numbers. Smoltz has a Cy Young, the other two don't but in fairness to Schilling he came in second to Randy Johnson twice and Johan Santana. However, in 1998, Smoltz finished in a tie for 4th with Maddux and Glavine won the award. Career ERA+ are all within two points of each other. Smoltz and Schilling are also close in wins. Where Smoltz sets himself apart from the two is when he reinvented himself as a closer, 154 saves in 3+ seasons. If the Hall was a bit sentimental, they'd add Smoltz to join Maddux and Glavine from last year, and/or add Schilling with Johnson together. I'd rank the odds as Smoltz then Schilling then Moose.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Someone should ask him about maybe having the highest prices for beer of any team? This is at the new market stores. 16oz beers are $10.99 for domestic and $12.49 for craft, hard, seltzers, or imported beers. 24oz beers are $14.99 for domestic and $15.75 for imports or hard seltzers. 12oz canned cocktails are $12.99.
    • I would say "stunning".... but is it, really?
    • Don't like this answer either.He is going to do Baltimore a favor and give them a gift. Don't trust him. Plus the Ravens stadium improvement money may not all come from bonds and maybe have to partially pay it off with a bank loan. As the MSA said the longer you wait on the financing, the more it will cost the taxpayers. I have heard the longer you wait and with interest rates rising the State is not sure the Orioke improvements can all be done with public funds.   The Orioles will play their first home game next Thursday, and Gov. Wes Moore and his children will throw out the first pitch. The Orioles’ current lease with the state of Maryland, its landlord, expires at the end of the year. Angelos has said that he hopes signing a long-term lease can be an “All-Star break gift,” meaning the deal would be done by early July. He didn’t provide an update on timing Thursday when asked, but said “we’re going to come through” when it comes to the lease. “There’s no question about it,” he said.
    • During the game, Angelos was asked if the Orioles would seek contract extensions with players such as Rutschman or top rookie Gunnar Henderson. Other teams have signed young players to long-term deals to avoid losing them later in free agency. For example, Wander Franco signed an 11-year, $182 million deal with the Tampa Bay Rays — a small-market team like the Orioles — this offseason. The Cleveland Guardians, another franchise Angelos pointed to as a team the Orioles would like to emulate, this week signed their young star, Andrés Giménez, to a seven-year contract reportedly worth $106.5 million. Angelos first pointed to the difficulty that small market teams face in MLB as compared to the NFL but did say he hoped that executive vice president and general manager Mike Elias would be able to extend the team’s young talent.   They’re going to do what they can within the system that they’re in. Does that mean extensions? Absolutely, I would hope so. But you gotta go with the system you’re in. It’s much, much, much tougher to be in the baseball system than in the football or basketball system,” he said.
    • “It’s an interesting concept and I saw that my good friends at The Baltimore Sun wanted to weigh in on that today. When the hedge fund that owns The Baltimore Sun, based in New York City, wants to open their books, I guess we’ll take a look at that. It’s difficult for me to understand what that fascination is,” Angelos said in the interview during the Orioles’ 10-9 win over the host Boston Red Sox on opening day.
    • Since Angelos’ offer in January, The Sun has requested information about a potential meeting with Angelos to discuss the team’s financials, but no meeting has ever been arranged. “When I say something — like I’m gonna sit down with you guys, explain the business from my perspective — I’m gonna do it,” Angelos said in February.
    • So he is fueding with the Baltimore Sun.. Angelos, the Orioles’ chairman and CEO, had twice this year told reporters that he would reveal details of the Orioles’ financial situation. However, when asked Thursday in an interview on 105.7 The Fan if and when he’d be following through on his word, Angelos indicated that he would not be. He responded to the radio hosts’ question by criticizing The Baltimore Sun, alluding to a recent Sun article on the topic.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...