Jump to content

J Upton...(Traded to SD)


srh523

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 418
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And you said WAR is overrated' date=' and apparently, had NO IDEA what WAR was. You just actually looked it up a short time ago.[/quote']

Yea, but I still don't feel any differently about it. I thought it meant you were taking into account the actual replacement that replaces a certain player. However, it's based off a hypothetical player which is the "average" it's still based on a replacement player so It's not like I was totally off base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have decided that can not possibly be as ignorant of basic facts as you are currently portraying yourself to be so I have decided to have no further discourse with you on this matter.

One more ? And ill let you go on your way. What am I portraying myself to be? A non believer in what some of you think is the end all be all in determining a players value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill say this about WAR I think it's a good COMPARISON stat. But just because player A has a WAR of 5 and player B has a WAR of 3 doesn'tnecessarily mean player A would be more beneficial to certain team.

I don't necessarily disagree. It's not a perfect stat, but it does have plenty of usefulness, such as telling us the overall value of a player. It's not gospel, but it's a good approximation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily disagree. It's not a perfect stat, but it does have plenty of usefulness, such as telling us the overall value of a player. It's not gospel, but it's a good approximation.

You don't? Why would a lower value be "more beneficial" to "certain teams" than a higher value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not more beneficial, but just because someone's WAR is higher doesn't mean they're definitely a better player. That's what it sounded like the guy was saying.

If it's a simple comment that WAR can be wrong what does a lower WAR can be "more beneficial to certain team" have to do with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily disagree. It's not a perfect stat, but it does have plenty of usefulness, such as telling us the overall value of a player. It's not gospel, but it's a good approximation.

The funny thing about WAR is it's just adding up all the stuff a player does. If you don't like fWAR or rWAR, you probably have your own version of WAR you call something else that substitutes some less rigorous, more subjective methods for the stuff you don't like. The good and bad thing about WAR is that it's consistent and repeatable and unbiased (or at least not biased for/against any particular player or team). Good because those things are objectively good. Bad because it's much harder to BS your way to a conclusion you like, which is really why most people who say they don't like WAR don't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's a simple comment that WAR can be wrong what does a lower WAR can be "more beneficial to certain team" have to do with it?

Doesn't WAR vary by publications? Just because a player is higher in fWAR doesn't mean he's the superior player.

As far as the specific statement, I couldn't tell you exactly what he meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
The Braves‘ offseason has been quietly criticized throughout the industry, with other teams wondering about Atlanta’s signing of Nick Markakis and about its trades, including getting injured pitching prospect Max Fried.

MLBtraderumors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • More from the Sun Statcast gave Toro’s batted ball an expected batting average of .740, but the tracking data also projected right fielder Ryan McKenna’s probability of making the catch at 85%. However, McKenna, who joined the Orioles on Friday in replace of demoted prospect Jackson Holliday, got a bad jump on the liner directly over his head, with Statcast measuring his jump at negative-12.4  Looks like he got a bad jump though to be fair that can happen with that type of hit.  Guy put on for defensive purposes need to make that play though. 
    • I honestly want to know this, but how old are you? How long have you've been watching baseball. I mean, sure, last night's game was not fun, but to say you won't watch much the next week over one game of a 162-game schedule just seems like you are putting too much emotion into one game and letting it affect the rest of your life. I mean, the Orioles are a better team than the A's, no one would argue otherwise, but even the best teams get beat 60 times a year and yes, sometimes the "inferior" team is going to win. I mean, the A's get paid too. Those guys are professionals that a trying their best for many reasons. Do you think they go into the game with the Orioles and think, "There's no way we can win this game?" No, they go into the game thinking anything can happen because what baseball history tells us that anything can happen, particularly in one baseball game no matter who is starting or what the records of the teams are. Sure, we can point to the things that went wrong last night and there are valid things to discuss like the fact that the bullpen is short at least one impact reliever (a guy that doesn't need to be taken out for platoon advantages and can pitch in high leverage situations effectively), Kimbrel has been used a ton already, and two defensive miscues in the outfield by outfielders with good defensive chops cost the team.  But they are nothing more than talking points. A loss is a loss. They are not fun. Ninth inning blown saves and losing in extras is not fun for the team or the fans. But, what we do know is the Orioles will be back tonight and they have a better chance of winning than losing due to the team's records. Does that mean they SHOULD win?  Statistically speaking they should, but that certainly does not mean they will. It's baseball and it's a long season. It's ok to vent in the game threads, but don't let it spill over into the main forum. 
    • Agree on the defensive play and Cowser has cooled off.  However, after fouling off a couple of 100 mph fastballs and getting brushed back by another I’m not going to fault him for getting frozen on a slider that probably looked like a fastball up and away halfway to home plate.   Gunnar guessed fastball, got center cut fastballs, and couldn’t make any contact.   Mason Miller might be bettter than The Mountain and I say that as the highest possible compliment.   I was surprised Miller was used on consecutive days when he had at least 2 days of rest for every other appearance.  I don’t think they were using him unless they got the lead.      Cowser’s missed cutoff man and McKenna not doing the one thing that justifies him being on the team, along with Kimbrel looking like he was over throwing did us in.
    • I rarely post here anymore since I've realized that I suck at this game compared to some of you guys.  But today I had my second lowest score ever, an 8, on what admittedly was a very easy grid.  
    • I’m as frustrated by McKenna as most and want him off the team, but some of these takes are a little over the top. With that said… I think he should’ve made that play. Feel like Tony prob would have. He’s slower but seems to read balls pretty well. 
    • The Ferrari was looking like a Ford Pinto with that Jump on the ball. I saw that the ball had an 85% catch chance and McKenna got a -12.4 ft jump on the ball. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...