Jump to content

Baseball America has Dariel Alvarez 5th on their prospect list


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Didnt Duke say when he traded for Lough, one of the points they liked about him, he was an above average OFer?

Has he said it lately?

It was DD that went out a got De Aza in the middle of a pennant race so he would not have to play Lough. Action speak louder than words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If Alvarez can even become a solid defensive 4th OF who can occasionally hurt you with his bat, then there is value there.

Right now though I would probably prefer to see him in AAA playing everyday then an occasional spot start here or there up here. If someone gets hurt, well I think we could do worse than Alvarez for depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has he said it lately?

It was DD that went out a got De Aza in the middle of a pennant race so he would not have to play Lough. Action speak louder than words.

Was that truly the case, I thought it was a couple of reasons, number 1, they kept saying last year in OH that De Aza was cheap replacement for Nick, in case they couldn't re-sign him.

De Aza was said to be on DD's list of players he had tried to acquire before and with Jeff Manto's endorsement, he thought he could buy low and perform one of his reclamation projects.

DD did say this, just the other day about Lough:

He singles out David Lough saying ?I like David Lough. I like what what David Lough did the last 3 months of the season. After he got over the concussion issues he had, he was one of our better players.? Rob tells Dan that David Lough scares him but Dan quickly defends his play early in the year, ?You guys are thinking about David Lough when he made his debut. I?m gonna tell you David Lough got a concussion in spring training and he had some issues with that it effected his performance until later in the year. I think we?ve got to give him another shot and take a good look at him.?

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2015/02/06/orioles-duquette-dodges-toronto-questions/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didnt Duke say when he traded for Lough, one of the points they liked about him, he was an above average OFer?
Has he said it lately?

It was DD that went out a got De Aza in the middle of a pennant race so he would not have to play Lough. Action speak louder than words.

I think what Redskins Rick means was that Duquette had said Lough was an above average defensive outfielder. Obviously, the trade for De Aza doesn't speak to that in particular.

As to who is better defensively, Lough or Alvarez, it's hard to say without having seen Alvarez in action. I don't think there's any real doubt that Lough is an excellent defender, based on the major league stats he has compiled and simple observation. Based solely on what I've read, I expect that Alvarez's arm is as good or probably better, that he probably is not quite as fast as Lough, but that he reads the ball well and takes good routes so probably isn't too far behind Lough as a ballhawk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what Redskins Rick means was that Duquette had said Lough was an above average defensive outfielder. Obviously, the trade for De Aza doesn't speak to that in particular.

As to who is better defensively, Lough or Alvarez, it's hard to say without having seen Alvarez in action. I don't think there's any real doubt that Lough is an excellent defender, based on the major league stats he has compiled and simple observation. Based solely on what I've read, I expect that Alvarez's arm is as good or probably better, that he probably is not quite as fast as Lough, but that he reads the ball well and takes good routes so probably isn't too far behind Lough as a ballhawk.

Thanks, I agree, and you said it better that I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don't know why they needed another catcher when the need BP help?
    • It really shouldn’t have to be either/or.  Plenty of teams have more than one big contract.    Four of Burnes’ years would be before Gunnar is being paid at FA prices.   However, if you start talking about multiple extensions of young players instead of just Gunnar, then I do think choices have to be made as to whether spending on Burnes would preclude that.    
    • Good clarification.  Thank you. I find it odd though, if the purpose of the 5 options r ule is to keep you from yo-yoing a player up and down too much, that the rules specifically exempts an option from counting if the guy is (yo-yo'd) back up within 20 days
    • Haven't read further in the thread to know if it's been noted, but there is a Concussion Protocol List which has a shorter maximum duration than the 10 day IL.   I think it is 5 days?   EDIT:  Having read further in the thread I see it is 7 days. So no doubt the move being made is: Mateo to the CL, with Vespi replacing him on the roster (since Vespi hasn't been down 15 days, he can only come up to replace someone going on an injury list). Norby coming up because we need 13 position players, and a pitcher going.   My guess is Vieira DFA.   It's pretty damn telling that in the post game yesterday Hyde said he had to stick with Tate as long as he did because he didn't have any rested RH relievers in the pen.   Vieira hadn't pitched in 6 days.
    • Still better than many internal options. 
    • It will be interesting to see how they handle Norby. Norby can play 2B and corner outfield, but he's a below average defender at 2B.  The Orioles history suggest Norby will be a bench guy for now with Urias slotting in at 3B and Westburg at 2B mostly while Mateo is out. Saying that, Norby give the Orioles a good right-handed bat off the bench and a guy who could spell Mullins with Cowser slotting over to CF.  The question is whether Norby will get some Hays PAs?  I'd personally like to just drop him at 2B and keep Westburg at 3B with Urias on the bench, but that would not be how the Orioles typically break in non "impact" rookies.  Either way, this is a well earned major league debut for Norby. Here's to hoping he's given a chance to play a bit. 
    • I think it’s a fair argument to make about players like Kjerstad. His promotion was questioned at the time as he was raking in AAA and there was not an obvious opportunity to play when promoted. And sure enough he sat on the bench primarily for weeks and was demoted. i think there’s a difference between promoting a player like Kjerstad and promoting a Maton etc. Our top prospects should only be promoted if they are going to get a long leash on playing time a la Holliday (IMO)
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...