Jump to content

Are the Orioles overrating Alvarez?


purple@orange

Recommended Posts

He has been better since he recovered from his injury? It is a unusual thing, but not suspicious to me. During the PED era it was much more common to see velocity return or even increase. Not often now.

It could be a health issue, could be a fitness issue, maybe his body responds better to 95 pitches every 5 days then 130 every 7?

I certainly wasn't accusing anyone of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If he had talent worth talking about, he would've dominated a league in which he was older than pretty much everyone. He didn't.

You were responding to connja who said he wasn't one of the 5 year $60 million guys. I thought it sounded like you said if you don't spend that much they're no good.

If I read it wrong I apologize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, even though I said I think everything Dan and Buck say about prospects must be taken with a grain of salt, Roch seems to be buying into the hype:

Dariel Alvarez: I'd fly down to Florida just to watch him make throws from right field. Showalter wonders why Alvarez doesn't appear on more top prospect lists. The Orioles view him as one of the best-kept secrets in the minors.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/02/which-orioles-bring-the-most-spring-curiosity.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I agree that Irvin is not in our "big 3", but if he continues to pitch well, it would be great to have a lefty starter in OPACY for the playoffs.   I don't think we should be heading into the postseason counting on Kimbrel for the 9th inning.  The rest of this roster is good enough to win a championship; they need a top tier closer.  
    • In terms of team needs hard throwing bullpen arm ranks first for me over starting pitcher even with Means injury. It's very possible Elias trades for a couple pitchers at the trade deadline with one of them being a starter. A reliever that can throw upper 90's will go a long way in the second half and playoffs.
    • Right. If Bradfield gets the ball into the gaps it’s almost an automatic double with his speed. 
    • I’m kind of confused with the “coming to earth a bit” idea/notion/words. He has had 2 bad outings ALL SEASON. And all of his numbers are still SUPERIOR in every way to any reliever on our roster.  The talent difference between what he can do and what our best two guys combined can do is very wide! Again, he has had two bad outings. One recently against the Rays and the other about 4/5 appearances ago against the Rockies. He is literally the very best reliever that we could acquire.
    • I’m not really worried about his performance, I’m worried about his injury history And the probability that it would interfere with him and the rest of the season. However, He is coming down to earth a bit; it’s not just his last outing, but his last few outings, I think. Still love to have him, but the price I would be willing to pay has decreased a little bit.
    • Well that explains how we keep ending up with bad relievers off the trash heap.
    • Mateo has an open stance at the plate and also stands back from the plate. Hence, he is very susceptible to the  slider or sweeper off the plate. I was expecting a strike out last night with runners on first and third. In fact, he had two swings and misses at outside breaking pitches during that at bat. But, the pitcher threw one that was in the wrong place and Mateo ripped it. He is doing a good job of staying on those pitches he can handle. And, as stated above, not quite as prone to wave at outside breaking stuff. He is fun to watch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...