Jump to content

Maryland vs. Butler, 3/17


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's good thing Gary took Jones out for an extended period of time when he was on fire. They really got a lot more out of Hayes. That was fantastic.

No offense to Hayes cause he usually runs the offense just fine, but I have to agree with you on this one. Hayes adds almrost nothing to the team scoring wise, and while Vasquez gets his fair share of points he's anything but a reliable source.

Keeping both of them on the court with Straw, Gist, and Ibekwe leave you with only 1 real reliable scorer in Gist. That hurts your chances of scoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on earth didnt MD foul Butler when there was a 3 second differential!????

If Butler makes a shot the games over, if they miss the ball is bouncing off the rim with 3 seconds left on the other end of the floor.

Just terrible, terrible decisions.

I think there was a 6 second differential. I probably would have preferred to foul, but not the 2nd best FT shooter in the nation. It would have looked pretty smart if they got the defensive rebound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was absolutely an awful call. You guys have the right to complain about it.

However, ask Vazquez and Ibewke why you lost....Free throws.

Embarassing loss when you lose to a team that you would not have recruited one kid off of. An 3-4 ACC school should not lose to a Horizon (whatever the hell that is) conference team. I wrote it yesterday this team will go as far as Ibekwe takes them and they did......Goodbye Jones, Ibekwe, and Strawberry-good luck in the CBA. Unless GW finds a way to get more talented kids this is as good as it gets. Watch Ohio St or UNC, what a difference. Hello baseball season.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MD lost this game themselves, no one to blame but themselves.

C'mon you can look at stuff like missed free throws and say that's why they lost and I would agree with you in the long run. But they had a chance to tie the game and got raped by the Refs with that BS offensive foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Embarassing loss when you lose to a team that you would not have recruited one kid off of. An 3-4 ACC school should not lose to a Horizon (whatever the hell that is) conference team. I wrote it yesterday this team will go as far as Ibekwe takes them and they did......Goodbye Jones, Ibekwe, and Strawberry-good luck in the CBA. Unless GW finds a way to get more talented kids this is as good as it gets. Watch Ohio St or UNC, what a difference. Hello baseball season.....

That's what is great about college basketball. Play solid fundamental basketball, execute your gameplan, shoot the ball well and you have a chance to beat teams with much more raw talent. Butler is a damn good team and while it is disappointing I think it's a little over the top to say that it is embarassment losing to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, gotta hope that Gary can get on his knees and beg Lucas to be a Terp, cause things look pretty bleak for next year. Gist and Osby should be OK, but where are we going to get points? Basically our top three offensive players are going to be playing for the Madrid Mangos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, gotta hope that Gary can get on his knees and beg Lucas to be a Terp, cause things look pretty bleak for next year. Gist and Osby should be OK, but where are we going to get points? Basically our top three offensive players are going to be playing for the Madrid Mangos.

MD has a good future ahead of them...No need to get down on them because they lost today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense to Hayes cause he usually runs the offense just fine, but I have to agree with you on this one. Hayes adds almrost nothing to the team scoring wise, and while Vasquez gets his fair share of points he's anything but a reliable source.

Keeping both of them on the court with Straw, Gist, and Ibekwe leave you with only 1 real reliable scorer in Gist. That hurts your chances of scoring.

I'll agree to an extent but then I will say that they are only freshmen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what is great about college basketball. Play solid fundamental basketball, execute your gameplan, shoot the ball well and you have a chance to beat teams with much more raw talent. Butler is a damn good team and while it is disappointing I think it's a little over the top to say that it is embarassment losing to them.

Totally agree.

I have been saying that it was a bad matchup for the Terps and was chastized for it.

Butler is a tough team for MD. They will pretty much always dictate tempo and if they shoot well, they are tough to beat.

MD had a very good year. It is disappointing that they didn't beat Butler, who they are much more talented than but still, they played great the last 6 weeks and their fans should be pretty proud of the season IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a positive note, MJ was fantastic, at least he ended his career strong over the last couple months or so. And I'm not going to be one of those people to say good riddance to the senior class, well maybe Bowers.:D DJ, MJ, and Ekene all had solid careers with MD, played hard, and I don't recall them having any off the court issues. Sure Ekene and MJ could have had much better careers, but they were decent and finished pretty strong. This was a good season, and the blame for the two seasons before mostly lies elsewhere imo. In their sophomore year, they had the whole Gilchrist-Gary fued that really hurt the team, and last year they had no PG and McCray failing classes.

Farewell and good luck to the seniors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MD has a good future ahead of them...No need to get down on them because they lost today.

Vasquez and Hayes make a nice guard combo, but they don't really know what they have behind Gist and Osby for big men. Behind that you have Burney, Dupree, and Gregory who all have zero college expierence and really only three star prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • You bring up a great observation about the Lightning. They are in the same city and are not a small market. I would argue that the reason why is because they have managed to capture the hearts/attention of the marketplace. IMO you don't do that by allowing your fans to carry constant anxiety about who's going to be here this year and who will be gone. Of course there is roster turnover in all pro and college sports. But there also has to be some stability and confidence amongst your fans/customers that the org is as invested as me (Joe Blow the fan) and not indifferent (won't do what it takes for us/team to win it all).  
    • Is that the best model to pattern after? The outlier? Elias does not and should not ever have to go "all in on one season". I've never been sure what that realistically looks like other than a fear mantra that was created by someone who is so attached to the notion that the O's must retain every prospect in order to fulfill some kind of fan fantasy of having an "all homegrown team". Rubenstein should and MUST offer the necessary support to Elias in order to sustain winning. When I hear "hands off" I hear uninterested and uninvolved which is not what I have observed from Rubenstein who has been at EVERY SINGLE GAME that I have attended this year. "Hands off" to me seems to be the opposite of Rubenstein and not desirable at all. IMO great orgs/companies/teams need great leadership from the top. Also, there can realistically be no repeat of the Duquette years. That org/administration never had a firm foundation and the success was always built on a house of cards. It always felt we arrived at competitive/good by accident. Lastly, I have NEVER EVER said anything close to "prospects be damned". But I don't it will serve us will to be dogmatic about any singular approach. True genius is in the ability to adapt. We will have a limited ceiling like (Tampa Bay Rays/Guardians) if we are going to limit ourselves to being a prospect only/homegrown team.
    • I don’t think they pay him 22M.  2/35-3/48 type deal. Leas AAV for more years.
    • He really seems like good trade bait. Enough talent to get a veteran reliever, not enough talent that we need to keep him.   
    • I would be shocked if Elias traded Basallo, Mayo, or Holliday.   I don’t think it’s happening.  I’m tempted to say zero chance of that happening.
    • I mean, yeah, in theory. But if you don't think he's subtly or not-so-subtly steering his clients towards free agency with years of material/arguments that make it seem like the smartest idea (and he would know, look at his track record, etc), then that's pretty naive.  Like, yeah, if his client is adamant about something, sure. But if they're on the fence, he's a master manipulator. 
    • I dont think it matters in the playoffs. You need a little bit of luck in a 5 or a 3 game series.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...