Jump to content

Orioles trade Davies for Parra. Your verdict?


PaulFolk

Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?

    • I approve. A small price to pay to fix the O's OF hole with a quality veteran.
    • I disapprove. The O's gave up up a pitching prospect for a rental who won't move the needle.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Neither the Giants nor the Royals were world beaters in the regular season last year. Nor the Cardinals before that. All wild card winners and World Series teams. Trust in the playoff power of small sample size.

As with most sports, it really only matter how well you are playing when you make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to laugh when the Jays don't make the playoffs. How many big moves have they made the last 3-4 seasons and every single year the media get behind them. Such linear thinking doesn't always pan out and if they don't win now, they will look very foolish in a couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are always unhappy with any move this team makes. We aren't going to give up Gausman, so what do people expect? I would rather win right now than worry about a guy who tops out at 91-92 on his heater. The Os window for success is dwindling because we don't spend money like bigger markets do. Fine with me. But when the tide is high....I am riding this wave until the end. Go Birds!!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, we traded for a rental platoon player? Geez, not happy. I'd rather let Nolan sink or swim so that we can finally make a decision on him.

Probably not, in practice. I expect Parmalee to be the odd man out with Davis back to 1B, Parra in RF and the Snider/Reimold platoon in LF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parra has an .884 OPS this year. We gave up a pitcher (and a good one) who is 6'0" and 150 lbs and has below average velocity and above average command. I get that Davies is a good prospect, but that is the price of doing business.

Parra should bat 2nd. Machado, Parra, Jones, Davis, Wieters, Parades, Hardy, Schoop, Snider/Reimold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Too many eggs in one basket for me.  Usually you either go quantity or quality.  This feels like both quality and quantity.  You are trading away 3 possibly 4 guys that can go directly into their starting lineup.  You never see a 4 for 1 with that much major league ready guys.  It usually 1 or 2 major league guys then a few lottery tickets with some upside.   Cease got you one major league ready prospect, a 21 year old decent pitcher in AA, A young toolsy outfielder in A ball and a 29 year old relief pitcher in the majors.  
    • I'm going to disagree because I don't think hit for average is considered an "elite athlete" tool.  Elly De La Cruz is an elite athlete, so was Bubba Starling.  Mateo is an Elite athlete. You can be an elite athlete and still not be a good ML player.  
    • I think when people say "elite athlete" about a baseball player, they mean that someone has the proverbial five tools--hit for average, hit for power, run, throw, field.   Someone like (say) Ronald Acuna Jr. or Gunnar Henderson.    Obviously there are great baseball players who never had all five tools (Frank Thomas) and players who were elite athletes who could have been better had they mastered other skills such as plate discipline (Adam Jones).   The "five tools" framework means that most catching prospects, including Basallo, will never be considered to be elite athletes, because they lack top-grade speed.   And it's rare that you would hear a pitcher described as an "elite athlete".  
    • They are not going to trade Holliday for one starter.  They need a couple of bullpen arms before a starter.
    • It's closer than the vote totals seem to indicate IMO.  I honestly wouldn't be against it because I do think Crochet is top shelf talent.  And it does cash out some strong/buried assets too. I landed on appreciating what Cowser adds all around vs. questioning the bump he'd provide for 2024.  
    • If Skubal is truly on the table, I’m definitely of the mindset to give up one of the big three as a trade centerpiece. For me, that’s Holliday given the potential of Mayo slotting at 3B and Westy moving back to 2B. Skubal is exactly what we need to go win a WS this year. 
    • Where's @DirtyBird to downvote everyone that's saying 2/3 is fine? I hate Oakland.  Hate, hate, hate Oakland.  Every year it seems that they give us fits for no good reason, especially in their place.  And @Frobbythat's not an invite for you to go do research and be like "well, actually" if I'm wrong.   I can't name 5 players on their team and I'm sure they'll give us fits this weekend.  But I see Brent Rooker is still on the team.  If he doesn't have 5 homers and 20 RBI against us this weekend, I'll be surprised.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...