Jump to content

Os Sign O'Day for 4 Years - It's official


Nevermore

Recommended Posts

Actually it could be. We aren't going to sign any SP who will do much to upgrade. If we are to compete we need a shut down pen. Signing O'Day may be a cheaper way of improving pitching over all than signing a mid rotation SP.

Exactly. Mike Pelfrey just got 2/16. 8 million per. In 10 years of starting he's been worth a total of 6.8 WAR. O'day has been a 2+ WAR reliever in six of his eight MLB seasons. The only seasons he wasn't was his rookie year and the year he got injured and only threw 16.2 IP for Texas.

Give the guy 4/30 and be done with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Exactly. Mike Pelfrey just got 2/16. 8 million per. In 10 years of starting he's been worth a total of 6.8 WAR. O'day has been a 2+ WAR reliever in six of his eight MLB seasons. The only seasons he wasn't was his rookie year and the year he got injured and only threw 16.2 IP for Texas.

Give the guy 4/30 and be done with it.

Then we go to battle with Reimold and Alvarez in the starting outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darren is a smart guy. I have to think he is weighing pitching for Baker vs Showalter. Baker is a known arm abuser. Buck gives his pitcher rest whenever needed. Britton just said on the Hot Stove last night that if he asked Buck for a game off he always got it.

Baker is an arm abuser of veteran relievers? I haven't heard that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baker is an arm abuser of veteran relievers? I haven't heard that.

I think he means Kerry Wood, Mark Prior with the cubs. Which hopefully he's onto something and that comment Britton made is true with O'day too. He doesn't want to go to LA. The nats bullpen is drama central right now plus the Baker thing. Hope he chooses Buck and the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he means Kerry Wood, Mark Prior with the cubs. Which hopefully he's onto something and that comment Britton made is true with O'day too. He doesn't want to go to LA. The nats bullpen is drama central right now plus the Baker thing. Hope he chooses Buck and the O's.

Wood and Prior weren't veteran relievers. I can't think of any examples of Baker breaking relief pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Mike Pelfrey just got 2/16. 8 million per. In 10 years of starting he's been worth a total of 6.8 WAR. O'day has been a 2+ WAR reliever in six of his eight MLB seasons. The only seasons he wasn't was his rookie year and the year he got injured and only threw 16.2 IP for Texas.

Give the guy 4/30, and be done with it.

Then we go to battle with Reimold and Alvarez in the starting outfield.

One of Reimold's strengths is that he is a very patient hitter, and usually has a pretty good OBP.

In regard to Alvarez, we've already added Trumbo (career .300 OBP, and .310 OBP last year), who presumably will be getting a lot of playing time at 1st base and/or DH, and/or the outfield.

To me, the idea of adding both Trumbo and Alvarez to a lineup that is already struggling badly in terms of OBP is alarming.

Granted that OBP is not the only measure of offensive success, and I suppose that an argument could be made that adding them both would improve the lineup in spite of their low OBP's, but that is what jumped out at me when reading the possibility that you posed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Mike Pelfrey just got 2/16. 8 million per. In 10 years of starting he's been worth a total of 6.8 WAR. O'day has been a 2+ WAR reliever in six of his eight MLB seasons. The only seasons he wasn't was his rookie year and the year he got injured and only threw 16.2 IP for Texas.

Give the guy 4/30 and be done with it.

How do we get to O'Day with a rotation of KG, Tillman, Ubaldo, Miguel, and ????? Starting pitching may not be KC's strong suit, but they at least had Cueto and Ventura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do we get to O'Day with a rotation of KG, Tillman, Ubaldo, Miguel, and ????? Starting pitching may not be KC's strong suit, but they at least had Cueto and Ventura.

We can get an actual Royal in Jeremy Guthrie. His time in KC turned him from the world's unluckiest starter to a winner who wins for winning teams. Coming off a 5.95 ERA he should be available for $5.95.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wood and Prior weren't veteran relievers. I can't think of any examples of Baker breaking relief pitchers.

He never got the chance to break down a reliever because he left the starters in forever. Heck the relievers could go to teh games and just hang out half the times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do we get to O'Day with a rotation of KG, Tillman, Ubaldo, Miguel, and ????? Starting pitching may not be KC's strong suit, but they at least had Cueto and Ventura.

Cueto was only there a portion of the season and for the most part stunk. Ventura was on a bus back to AAA before an injury brought him back it is not like those two did much for the Royals starting pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do we get to O'Day with a rotation of KG, Tillman, Ubaldo, Miguel, and ????? Starting pitching may not be KC's strong suit, but they at least had Cueto and Ventura.

The Royals starters had very similar results to us a better ERA but the play in a better pitchers park and they had even less innning pitched from the starters then we did.

We still need to add a starter but no matter if we add a number 1 or a back end of the rotation the team will not improve if Tilman, Gonzo, and Gausman pitch better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can get an actual Royal in Jeremy Guthrie. His time in KC turned him from the world's unluckiest starter to a winner who wins for winning teams. Coming off a 5.95 ERA he should be available for $5.95.

For what it's worth, Guthrie was an Oriole for more seasons than he was Royal and appeared/started in approximately 50 more games as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He never got the chance to break down a reliever because he left the starters in forever. Heck the relievers could go to teh games and just hang out half the times.

On Baker's last team, the 2013 Reds, his starters averaged just over six innings per start and he had five relievers pitch at least 55 innings. Including Alfredo Simon who threw 87.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • That's pretty good for his rookie season, no? I'm a bit confused by the characterization of his peripheral stats not being great. Yep, basically agree with this. With the favorite undoubtedly being Povich, and Rogers / Suárez (bullpen) / McDermott next up when the inevitable injury hits. 
    • I’m not entertaining the Adley trade ideas but I do like Seattle as a trade partner still. I think Luis Castillo is the guy we could get to give them some financial flexibility. JRod’s salary goes up this year and their other arms are very cheap so if we can absorb Castillo’s contract, it would cost us less prospect/trade capital. This is the type of deal I think we make if we can’t sign Burnes. 
    • How do you Know that? And how does the BP keep him healthy? The only other pitcher i'm aware of for the O's that had a lat problem, was Richard Bleier, 2018 grade 3 strain required surgery> missed almost one year, went the next 4plus years injury free.
    • I have good news about the sound system at OPACY.
    • I don't think there is any way we trade Adley. Also doubt Seattle is interested. However, regarding DH, his DH/C splits mirror his platoon splits and he mostly DH's as RHB when McCann plays C. Be careful not to confuse correlation with causation. This will be interesting to test if/when we have a lefty C option, i.e. Basallo.  Holliday or Mayo might interest them though. 
    • Are the Orioles shortcomings mostly about the position player acquisition and development?    Pitching injuries were significant this year as even those pitching at the end were out for periods of time - Kremer, Eflin, Webb, Perez and obviously Danny Coulombe.  We could continue to argue that the O's internal pipeline needs to be more robust, but they do seem to have a knack for acquiring pitchers and improving them - Soto and Dominguez were better than they were with the Phillies along with the previously acquired relief core, Irvin did not pan out and Rogers remains a TBD but Bradish, GROD, Cano, Povich all seem to have benefitted from the approach of the pitching staff- one that included new coaches prior to this season.   Again Elias likes to dumpster dive (as do all GM's) but did pay up for Burns, Eflin, Dominguez and Rogers and spent/gambled perhaps unwisely on Kimbrel.   Could have spent more in terms of prosepct value for other trade deadline acquisitions, but would that have made a difference at the end given the offense/RISP issues?  Maybe the O's win a few more games 1-0? The primary issues seems to be the position players/hitting.  1) There has never been any major investment in PP acquisition other by trade FA signing.  Elias has moved most of his PP chips to the draft and internal development and only O'Hearn who was a waiver wire claim and designated for assignment (at least once after being acquired) saw any real offensive improvement.      2) If the equivalent of Slater,  Rivera and Jimenez, Soto, Pache, McCann etc had been pitcher acquisitions, the pitching staff would be horrific.  One would think if there is any method to offloading Cook, Hays, Norby, Cowser, Ortiz there would be at least 1 or 2 upside hitters that they O's could pick up.    Will agree that Urias and Mateo who came on board in 2022 were good acquisitions but the approach then was different - there were no internal options and they both played everyday primarily because of GG defense.   They were also given plenty of time to be both bad and good at hitting with no consquence or pressure.    3) 2024 Minor League PP promotions have not panned out so far.   Newly promoted players do not appear ready to field or hit, seem to regress.  HK, Jackson, Mayo - are all major investments together with Basallo and are huge future chips that frankly need to pan out and be developed correctly.    How much confidence do we have in this coaching staff to enable this group to reach their potential?  Gunnar and Westburg are exceptional players but were not rushed, had very few setbacks and suspect they would be good on any team - nothing special was done by O/s ML staff to make them better other than very early on with Gunnar who was drafted out of HS.  Both also got to play with slightly lower team expectations - 2022/early 2023.  4) Vet core players -  Mountcastle, Mullins, Santander are all streaky and most of their good stats are driven by bursts of productivity.    Santander seems on his own and HR's were a nice bonus this year but other parts of his games Walks, RISP have regressed.   Mullins is battling a chronic illness and remains an elite CF who needs a platoon partner for most LHP.       Mountcastle would appear to be a classic change of scenery player - will get better with a new team either because something clicks or a trade serves as a wake up call and everyone will complain about letting him go, but that's baseball. 5) Adley and Cowser - these two are probably the tipping point for me - What's up with Adley's full half season regression?    Cowser has improved but is miserable with RISP and inconsistent, but will he get better?  How the O's handle these two plus Jackson, HK, Mayo and Basallo will determine the future run of success.    Overall, what are the key factors for developing players into hitters that come through under pressure and when the games really matter?  Player readiness, coaching process, player familarity or loyalty to the O's system, innovative approach?   Seems like the O's hitting process remains a WIP and one that has not paid off to date.  Do we believe success is on the player or the coaching staff?  Do they need to be surrounded by a better veteran group/1-2 players that have won, take away some of the pressure, help to manage the clubhouse.    
    • Next year? Last year's playoff hurt. It was our first in a while and we didn't get any pitching. This year's playoff was downright embarrassing. We got great pitching and looked terrible at the plate. If this year's performance doesn't motivate those that return to improve all aspects of their game, I will be very surprised and disappointed. We were told last year was experience. Well this year was humiliation at all staffing levels. So, if that's part of "the process," learn and grow from it. Anxious to see what changes happen for 2025.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...