Jump to content

Os Sign O'Day for 4 Years - It's official


Nevermore

Recommended Posts

Had career-bests in most categories after being some combination of hurt and mediocre since 2009. RHP who only threw 55 innings and < 1 IP/G.

Way outpitched his FIP/xFIP, first sub-3.00 ERA since 2010, first 50-inning season since 2011.

Really consistently good if you overlook the fact he missed all of 2012-2014.

O'Day's performance record is leaps and bounds better than those others.

For the life of me, I'm not sure how you can look at this market, and not think that the O's did very, very well on this contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think what we're seeing is a new role called "high leverage reliever (HLR)." Some have screamed for years that the closer should be used in high leverage situations since he's normally the best reliever, but what we're seeing are teams having a closer and an HLR. HLRs don't get the gaudy save totals, but it's clear they hold a lot of value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what we're seeing is a new role called "high leverage reliever (HLR)." Some have screamed for years that the closer should be used in high leverage situations since he's normally the best reliever, but what we're seeing are teams having a closer and an HLR. HLRs don't get the gaudy save totals, but it's clear they hold a lot of value.

I agree, but think that what's important about the best of these guys is that they're more flexible and versatile than closers. For closers, we're told, it's important to have regularity (well, maybe that kind of regularity, too, but that's not what I mean): they will be most effective if used exclusively to pitch one inning, coming on to start the ninth (sometimes later in an extra-inning game) in a close game. The HLR often will start the eighth inning in a close game and be limited to a single inning, but he can come in earlier when the game's on the line, come in with men on in the eighth if a game has gotten closer or a lead more tenuous, or pitch more than inning when he's had some rest. And he can close if your closer is hurt or needs the rest more than your HLR.

Sounds kind of like Darren O'Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, but think that what's important about the best of these guys is that they're more flexible and versatile than closers. For closers, we're told, it's important to have regularity (well, maybe that kind of regularity, too, but that's not what I mean): they will be most effective if used exclusively to pitch one inning, coming on to start the ninth (sometimes later in an extra-inning game) in a close game. The HLR often will start the eighth inning in a close game and be limited to a single inning, but he can come in earlier when the game's on the line, come in with men on in the eighth if a game has gotten closer or a lead more tenuous, or pitch more than inning when he's had some rest. And he can close if your closer is hurt or needs the rest more than your HLR.

Sounds kind of like Darren O'Day.

Great points. O'day is the guy you love to have because he can be used in variety or ways, multiple innings if needed, and can get left-handers and right-handers out. I've been saying for a few years now that teams need both a closer and an HLR. It's just now that teams are starting to pay their HLRs closer money because they realize they are that valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what we're seeing is a new role called "high leverage reliever (HLR)." Some have screamed for years that the closer should be used in high leverage situations since he's normally the best reliever, but what we're seeing are teams having a closer and an HLR. HLRs don't get the gaudy save totals, but it's clear they hold a lot of value.

BJ Ryan in 2004 and Jim Johnson in 2011 come to mind as HLR's who were much more valuable than the team's closer (Jorge Julio and Kevin Gregg, respectively). In both cases, they became the team's closer the following season. Britton actually had a similar HLR role in 2014 (along with O'Day) before becoming the closer after Tommy Hunter spit the bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BJ Ryan in 2004 and Jim Johnson in 2011 come to mind as HLR's who were much more valuable than the team's closer (Jorge Julio and Kevin Gregg, respectively). In both cases, they became the team's closer the following season. Britton actually had a similar HLR role in 2014 (along with O'Day) before becoming the closer after Tommy Hunter spit the bit.

Great points. O'Day also could be a handicap in case Britton goes the FA route next year and someone tosses crazy money at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great points. O'Day also could be a handicap in case Britton goes the FA route next year and someone tosses crazy money at him.

Britton has three more years under team control. I can't see him getting DFA'd unless he is a total disaster for the next two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great points. O'Day also could be a handicap in case Britton goes the FA route next year and someone tosses crazy money at him.

Maybe I'm missing your point, but Britton isn't a FA until 2019. How is anyone throwing crazy money at him until then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great points. O'Day also could be a handicap in case Britton goes the FA route next year and someone tosses crazy money at him.

As others have pointed out, Britton is not a free agent for three more years. However, the availability of O'Day gives us the flexibility to trade Britton if we deem that a wise thing to do down the road. I'd say it depends a bit on how Givens does in 2016. If he's as effective next year as he was this season, then Britton becomes something of a luxury for us. But I'd rather see Givens over a full season rather than trading Britton now and relying on the 30 IP we saw last year. I want to see how effective he is once the hitters have seen him several times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...