Jump to content

Giolito For O'Day or Brach


joew

Recommended Posts

I doubt the Nats do Giolito for Britton even. I hope to God they don't do it for Miller either.

If we got him somehow he would instantly push Worley to the pen.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If the Nats would trade him for Miller and NOT for Britton, they are nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Britton For Giolito would hurt the Orioles chances this year

The Orioles "window" is often referenced as being 2016-2018. You can easily argue that over that entire window Giolio would bring more value.

But it's July 29th - the Orioles are leading the division and 15 games over .500 - Dan/Buck/etc cannot and will not make moves that hurt this teams chances to win the World Series.

That said, I'd probably trade Britton for Giolio if I were in charge. The value of a young cost controlled potential ace is just so much higher than that of an elite closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britton For Giolito would hurt the Orioles chances this year

The Orioles "window" is often referenced as being 2016-2018. You can easily argue that over that entire window Giolio would bring more value.

But it's July 29th - the Orioles are leading the division and 15 games over .500 - Dan/Buck/etc cannot and will not make moves that hurt this teams chances to win the World Series.

That said, I'd probably trade Britton for Giolio if I were in charge. The value of a young cost controlled potential ace is just so much higher than that of an elite closer.

Britton isn't just another closer, he's the best. I'd still do the deal though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yanks would be idiotic, which for us unfortunately they aren't, if they didn't take Giolito for Miller. It's every GMs dream to be offered the #1 prospect in baseball for a reliever especially when said team is selling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britton isn't just another closer, he's the best. I'd still do the deal though
So you would take the chance of missing the playoffs just to get Giolito . O'Day and Brach are not Britton. Our chances of making the playoffs go down without Britton. To me no prospect is worth missing the playoffs. Plus hasn't Giolito already been injured . With the Orioles luck with injuries I wouldn't be taking that chance either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you would take the chance of missing the playoffs just to get Giolito . O'Day and Brach are not Britton. Our chances of making the playoffs go down without Britton. To me no prospect is worth missing the playoffs. Plus hasn't Giolito already been injured . With the Orioles luck with injuries I wouldn't be taking that chance either.

It's a no brainer to me. The best Rp is getting paid 10-13 million. Giolito could be worth 30 million in the near future and is young and cost controlled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a no brainer to me. The best Rp is getting paid 10-13 million. Giolito could be worth 30 million in the near future and is young and cost controlled

Agreed. This talk is pure fantasy though. Neither team would make the deal right now.

And neither Brach or O'Day gets you Giolito either. Rizzo is pretty adamant about not mortgaging the future of that franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what happens if you derisively refer to him as "The #1 Suspect" and remind people that sometimes prospects don't work out? Then could we get him for Ryan Flaherty and a PTBNL?

Just think how many rings the O's would have if they'd traded Machado for Chase Headley in early '12, and Bundy and Schoop for Cliff Lee shortly thereafter.

If you wouldn't make this trade, you should just delete your account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For god's sake, Giolito is one of the best young pitching prospects in all of baseball. He'd cost you a hell of a lot more than a relief pitcher. Seriously people. Think before you write embarrassing garbage like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes sense for both teams. I'm not sure why no one has suggested it. I think the O's would have to give up a bit more though. I wonder if the two teams would actually make a deal together.

Good thread starter.

No, it really doesn't. If we were out of contention, I'd do this in a heartbeat. It would be a steal. But we are in no position to trade away core players to winning THIS YEAR for future players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...