Jump to content

Pedro back. (Will he opt out?)


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 hours ago, Rojo13 said:

Can someone tell me why he's worth zero and yet he's averaging 25 homes per year for the lass five and Davis is worth 22 million plus?

 

Yes Davis is better but not 22 million better. I'd rather have Pedro at three million per and then 19 million to spend on a pitcher. 

Davis career OPS: .827 (120 OPS+)

Alvarez career OPS: .759 (107 OPS+)

Add to that the fact that Chris Davis is a plus, some would say GG-caliber, first baseman, while Alvarez is almost positionless (or at least a major negative).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Davis career OPS: .827 (120 OPS+)

Alvarez career OPS: .759 (107 OPS+)

Add to that the fact that Chris Davis is a plus, some would say GG-caliber, first baseman, while Alvarez is almost positionless (or at least a major negative).

Davis HR Champion 2 out of 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scOtt said:

Davis HR Champion 2 out of 3 years.

I'm just trying to channel Big Peter's line of thinking. To somehow explain it to myself. Because he's the one that made this deal. If he would have at least stayed out of it, DEMANDED that DD sign Davis, DD would have gotten a much better deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scOtt said:

I'm just trying to channel Big Peter's line of thinking. To somehow explain it to myself. Because he's the one that made this deal. If he would have at least stayed out of it, DEMANDED that DD sign Davis, DD would have gotten a much better deal.

Or he would have gone to DET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weams said:

He is extended until today. 

Reminds me of the Pat Neshek situation in 2012.  Vet that signed an milb deal and we traded him to at least get something.  Well we traded him to another playoff team in Oak and he went on to post like a 1 ERA over 2 seasons there.  

Pedro is going to be a no win situation for us either way.  Either we let him go for nothing, or we call him up and he has no place to play anyway.  The only thing good to come out of this, is that DD and the org. will build up some good vibes with future players and agents in Pedro's situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

He is extended until today. 

 

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Reminds me of the Pat Neshek situation in 2012.  Vet that signed an milb deal and we traded him to at least get something.  Well we traded him to another playoff team in Oak and he went on to post like a 1 ERA over 2 seasons there.  

Pedro is going to be a no win situation for us either way.  Either we let him go for nothing, or we call him up and he has no place to play anyway.  The only thing good to come out of this, is that DD and the org. will build up some good vibes with future players and agents in Pedro's situation.  

Maybe he can be part of a trade deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Reminds me of the Pat Neshek situation in 2012.  Vet that signed an milb deal and we traded him to at least get something.  Well we traded him to another playoff team in Oak and he went on to post like a 1 ERA over 2 seasons there.  

Pedro is going to be a no win situation for us either way.  Either we let him go for nothing, or we call him up and he has no place to play anyway.  The only thing good to come out of this, is that DD and the org. will build up some good vibes with future players and agents in Pedro's situation.  

Neshek pitched to a 2.70 ERA over 60 innings with Oakland.

Pedro may be a no-win scenario, but he's a no-loss one, too. The team took a flier on him and it probably isn't going to work out. In part because we've had guys surprise us (Mancini) and in part because Pedro honestly didn't take to outfield. He is a positionless player. That's why he had to take a minor league deal to begin with. Nobody wanted him for any kind of MLB salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...